Economic Loss Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Can pure economic loss be claimed for?

A

No (Spartan Steel v Martin and Co. Ltd), unless it was caused by misstatement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consequential economic loss

A

When the claimant loses money due to physical damage arising from negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case for consequential economic loss

A

Network Rail Infrastructure v Conarkin Group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case for claims under negligent misstatement

A

Hedley Byrne and Co. Ltd v Heller and Partners Ltd: If there is a special relationship between claimant and defendant, a duty of care will be found.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Negligent misstatement test

A

Defendant must possess some special skill relating to the statement

Defendant knows it is highly likely that the statement will be relied upon

Claimant uses the statement

It was reasonable to rely on the statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defendant must possess some special skill

A

Chaudry v Prabhakar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

D knows the statement is likely to be relied upon

A

Esso v Mardon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

C relies on the statement

A

Smith v Eric Bush

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

It was reasonable to rely on the statement

A

Spring v Guardian Assurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Spartan Steel v Martin and Co. Ltd

A

Pure Economic Loss cannot be claimed normally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Network Rail Infrastructure v Conarkin Group

A

Case for consequential economic loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hedley Byrne and Co. Ltd v Heller and Partners Ltd

A

Case for claims under negligent misstatement: If there is a special relationship between claimant and defendant, a duty of care will be found.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Chaudry v Prabhakar

A

Defendant must possess some special skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Esso v Mardon

A

D knows the statement is likely to be relied upon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Smith v Eric Bush

A

C relies on the statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Spring v Guardian Assurance

A

It was reasonable to rely on the statement