rylands v fletcher Flashcards
Quote for rylands v fletcher
‘A person who brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, is liable, for all the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape’
What elements need to be proven to claim under rylands v fletcher
- Has to be the occupier
- There is an accumulation
- Potentially dangerous
- An escape
- Non-natural use of land
- Damage is foreseeable
Occupier: hunter v canary wharf
Must own or rent the land
Occupier- wellers & Co v foot and mouth disease research institute
Virus escaped. Cattle auction tried to sue for loss of income. They had no interest in the land.
Occupier- Smith v scott
Local authority let a house to a homeless family. Would not cause any trouble. Next door neighbour tried to sue. The LA can not be sued.
Occupier- Rigby v chief constable of Northampton
Police attempted to capture a psychopath. Parked in a van. Released gas in a shop. Shop set on fire. R v f was applied.
What is an accumulation
Something just has to be stored
Likely to cause mischief
Likely to cause damage if it would escape
Danger- hillier v air ministry
Electricity escaped. Electrocuted his cows.
Damage- crowhurst v amersham burial board
Yew trees went over a boundary and poisoned animals in the adjacent field.
damage- hale v jenning bros
chair-o-plane in fairground flew off and damaged adjoining land
What is an escape
Anything leaving the premises
Escape- Stannard v gore
Stack of tyres that caught on fire and damaged the claimants land. Only the fire that had escaped so not liable
Escape- musgrove v pandelis
Fire in a garage from a cars petrol. Their has been negligence so a claim was allowed by the neighbouring property.
Escape- read v Lyons
Claimant inspected munitions during WW2. Shell exploded injuring her. held not liable in R v F.