intent to create legal relations (contract) Flashcards
both types of legal relations
domestic- not intent
business- intent
balfour v balfour
living together so no intent to create legal relations
merritt v merritt
they were separated do there was presumed intent
jones v padavatton
mum gave her daughter an allowance to give up her job. she brought her a house. mum wanted to repossess. not contractual as they were family so no intent
simpkins v Ray
2 house members entered a competition in someone elses name and paid an equal share. there were entitled to share winnings.
parker v clarke
young couple sell their house to move in with an older couple. fell out and they were asked to leave. they said they would inherit the house if they died. it was legally binding as they gave up their house
wilson 2007
agreement to share winnings with friends was showing intention
rose and frank
commercial can only be rebutted if expressed terms
sadler v reynolds
if it could either be social or business, the onus has to prove contract
mcgowan v radio buxton
prize of a car but the car was a toy. they were liable as it was misleading
edward v skyways
attempted to avoid making a free gift. the pay failed
esso petroleum v C&E
offer of free gift to promote business- it was legally binding
jones v vernon pools
no legal relations when company lost winning coupon.