rylands v fletcher Flashcards
rylands v fletcher definition
when D brings something onto their land and stores it there. if that thing escapes and causes damage to Cs property then D will be liable for all damage that is a natural consequence of the escape
4 factors of rylands v fletcher
- non natural use of the land
- an escape of the dangerous thing
- damage caused by escape
- damage must be forseeable
stage one of rvf
non natural use of the land - D has brought something onto their property which was not naturally there - transco, a use which is extraordinary and unusual
stage two of rvf
escape of a dangerous thing - must be an escape from somewhere the D had occupation or control over to somewhere the D has no occupation or control over - read v lyons, thing itself must actually escape
stage three of rvf
damage caused by escape - blackburn J said ‘D will be liable for all damage which is a natural consequence of the escape
stage four of rvf
damage must be forseeable - cambridge waters, damage caused by an escape myst be forseeable otherwise it will be too remote and unrecoverable
defense no1 for rvf
acts of a third party - fault is due to a third party, only available if D did not reasonably forsee the actions of a third party- rickards v lotnian
defense no2 for rvf
acts of god - where the escape is due to natural causes that no human foresight could have guarded against - nichols v marsland
defense no3 for rvf
statutory authority - escape was caused by soemthing d was obliged to dur bc of parliament
defense no4 for rvf
default of the claimant where the damage is due to the act or a default of the claimant
defense no5 for rvf
consent of the claimant