Rylands v Fletcher Flashcards
four elements in Rylands v Fletcher
-The bringing onto the land and accumulation/storage
-A thing likely to cause mischief if it escapes
-Which amounts to unnatural use of the land, and
-Which does escape and causes reasonably foreseeable damage to adjoining property
bringing onto land and accumulation
what is brought onto the land must be something which is not naturally present on the land. If it is present naturally there can be no liability.
Giles v Walker
D wasn’t liable when weeds from their property spread to the claimants property.
Ellison v Ministry of Defence
facts: a soldier was injured during a training exercise conducted by the Ministry of Defence.
principle: there is no liability for things that naturally accumulate on the property,
likely to do mischief if it escapes
Gas and electricity
Poisonous fumes
A flag pole
Tree branches
Hale v Jennings Bros
facts: Mrs. Hale fired for not wearing trousers.
held: Court ruled it was sex discrimination.
principle: Gender-based dress codes can be deemed as sex discrimination.
Transco v Stockport Borough Council
facts: Transco sought compensation for pipeline damage during roadworks.
held: Council not liable as duties were delegated to a competent contractor.
principle: Organizations can delegate duties to competent contractors and avoid liability for their actions.
1) non-natural use of land
Liability for negligence arises if the use of land poses a special danger to others, beyond what is ordinary or beneficial for the community.
natural uses of land examples
A fire in a grate which spread
Defective electric wiring that caused a fire
Domestic water supply
Rickards v Lothian
facts: plaintiff’s cellar flooded due to defendant’s burst pipe.
held: Natural use so no liability
4) escape and foreseeable damage
Ward LJ held
1. It is the ‘thing’ itself (tyres) which must escape not just the fire
2. Fire is dangerous so if a deliberate or negligent fire is started and it spreads, D will be liable under Rylands v Fletcher
3. However, starting a fire on your land may be natural use
defences
Act of a stranger
Act of God
Statutory authority (same as nuisance)
Act of a stranger
if a stranger causes the escape and D has no control over this stranger, D is not liable.
Perry v Kendricks Transport
facts: D parked their bus on their parking space. A stranger removed the petrol cap and a child was injured when another child threw a match into the tank.
held: The defence of act of a stranger was successful
act of god
extreme weather conditions that ‘no
human foresight can provide against’