Russia Theme 1: Communist government in the USSR, 1917–85 Flashcards

1
Q

What were the aims of the Bolsheviks prior to the revolution?

A

B party was one of several revolutionary groups in Russia. B’s main aim was to dismantle the upper and middle classes, along with the Tsarist regime that was outdated and backward (Russia essentially was still a feudal state). The B’s wanted to replace this system with socialism, and eventually communism, in line with Marxist ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the October Revolution?

A

B’s seized power in October 1917 due to a well-coordinated and executed uprising. the B’s took power from the provisional government which had taken power following the fall of the Tsars in Feburary of the same year. the B’s were still a fairly small party so portrayed the revolution as an uprising with mass support - when in reality they were met with very little resistance, due to the weakness of the provisional government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were the main groups opposing the Bolsheviks?

A

there were several other marxist groups who were denied a share of power by the Bolsheviks, such as the Socialist Revolutionaries (SRs) or Mensheviks. There were also groups of the right such as the Tsarist Supporters who mainly served the interests of middle and upper classes. these groups feared that their property and polticial freedoms would be taken away by the Bs. Finally there were nationalist groups in the Russian empire who saw the fall of the Tsarist regime as an opportunity to assert their independence. these included Ukrainians, Poles and Finns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did the Bolsheviks deal with other left wing groups who had more support?

A

calls for a coalition from the SRs and Ms were swiftly denied by Lenin. However in January 1918 a Parliament was called in the Constituent assembly. this would see parties be democratically elected by the Russian public. the SRs got the most seats - 410 - and 21 million votes, while the Bs only got 175 seats and 9 million votes. using ths system clearly posed a threat to Bolshevik rule. as a result Lenin condemned the system as an instrument of the bourgeoise and dissolved the assembly. lenin instead used the all-russian congress of soviets in its place, where the Bs had much more influence. this removed the opportunity for effective opposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how did the Bolsheviks destroy other parties after consolidating their control?

A

-the vote was taken from “bourgeois classes” such as employers and priests; this stripped the opposition parties of formal support.
-Mensheviks and SRs struggled to publish newspapers due to the Bolsheviks placing restrictions on what could be published.
-SRs lost all influence when they walked out of government in 1918, in protest to the B decision of pulling out of the First World War.
-in march 1918 the bolshevik party renamed itself the communist party and all other parties were effectively banned.
-in april 1921 lenin declared “the place for the mensheviks and the SRs is in prison”.
around 5000 Mensheviks were arrested in the first 3 months of 1921, and further waves later on; but by this time the mensheviks and SRs had effectively ceased to exist as parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the treaty of brest-litovsk, and why did lenin consider it beneficial to sign?

A

this was an agreement signed in 1918 by the bolshevik party that ceased Russian involvement in WW1. however this came at a great cost - russia lost control over the baltic states, finland, ukraine, and parts of the caucasus region. lenin was inclined to sign BL because it ensured the bolsheviks could consilidate power within russia, and begin the much-needed process of industrialisation, rather than having to focus budgets on military power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the consequences of the signing of brest-litovsk within russia?

A

conservatives in russia saw brest-litovsk as a national humiliation. this led to much more outspoken opposition to the Bs in conservative circles. the militant opposition group to the Bs became known as the whites. the whites were backed by Britain, france, the USA and Japan, as they were anxious to keep Russia in WW1. eventually this opposition to the bolshevik reds led to the russian civil war of 1918-1921.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the key features of the civil war?

A

Bolshevik Reds against Whites - this group incuded many opposition forces, including supporters of the tsar/provisional government, liberals, nationalists, etc. initially the area under bolshevik control was limited to moscow, being surrounded on all sides. however the Bs were still able to win the war, due to superior political, economic and military organisation. the whites on the other hand were only united by their desire to get rid of the Bs, and were divided on aspects such as military strategy, which led to failure. by the end of 1920 all White strongholds had been defeated by the Red Army.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the kronstadt mutiny?

A

1921 - the mutiny of sailors stationed at the kronstadt naval base, against the imposition of orders on the local soviet from the bolshevik government. the slogan of the mutineers was “soviets without bolsheviks”. the mutiny was brutally crushed by the RA, bu the affair was a severe shock to the regime because the sailors had previously been strong supporters of the Bolshevik Revolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the tambov rising?

A

1920/21 - a peasant uprising in the tambov region of central russia that was sparked by the arrival of bolshevik units to requisition grain for use in the cities and by the army. the uprising was largely spontaneous at first, but the peasants were able to build on their strength by forming a Green Army and establishing control over a large area. it took over 50,000 bolshevik troops to put down the revolt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the key results/consequences of the civil war?

A

-the successes of war communism for the Bs during the civil war prompted them to adopt a more authoritarian and centrally controlled system of government. power was fully in the hands of the government (sovnarkom) and party leadership (politburo)
-extensive use of terror used against political opponents during civil war - tone was set for the future of the party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was important about the tenth party congress?

A

1921 - at this point the civil war was all but won. over the course of the war Bolshevik membership had grown from 300,000 in 1918 to about 730,000 in 1921. this posed a threat to party stability - as a result lenin imposed a ban on factions within the party. this was also in part a response to the anxiety caused by the kronstadt mutiny and tambov rising.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the structure of soviet government under lenin?

A

-sovnarkom: the council of people’s commissars - took the role of a cabinet of top government ministers who were, in theory, responsible for making key decisions and giving government orders. its members, about 20 in total, were elected by the central executive committee. it was a small group that could make quick decisions, and it met on a daily basis during the civil war.
-central executive committee - was a larger group elected by the congress of soviets. its task was to oversee the work of the government and its administration.
-all-russian congress of soviets - was the supreme law-making body of the state. all laws issued by the sovnarkom had to be approved by the congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the structure of the communist party?

A

structure:
-politburo: group of 7-9 leading members of the bolshevik party, who were chosen by the party’s central committee to make the key decisions affecting policy. it took over from the larger central committee, which quickly proved to be unmanageable when making important decisions. the politburo met daily under lenin and became more important than the sovnarkom. besides lenin, leading members included leon trotsky and stalin.
-central committee - group of 30-40 members chosen by the party congress to represent its members. the CC was supposed to make key decisions on policy but after 1919, power was increasingly delegated to the politburo.
-party congress: was a body made up of representatives of local party branches. it discussed the general programme of the party and there were fierce debates at the ninth and tenth party congresses of 1920/21. the ban on factions under the ruling “on party unity”, which was passed in 1921, stifled debate, and the role of the congress in influencing policy subsequently declined. it met yearly under lenin from 1917 and this pattern continued until 1926.
-local party branches: below level of party congress. each branch was headed by a party secretary. these secretaries could be cery powerful, especially those who headed branches in key cities or provinces. Kamenev was head of party in Petrograd, Zinoviev was head in Moscow. both had significant power bases that allows them to play significant roles in the struggle to succeed Lenin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how much power did the communist party have, compared to the wider soviet government?

A

by the early 1920s it became clear that the real power had shifted from the apparatus of state, towards the party itself. the party apparatus mirrored that of the state, in its subdivisions becoming larger and less powerful at more specific regional levels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was democratic centralism?

A

Bs claimed their government was based on the principle of democratic centralism. this was the idea that there were soviets at a local level that represented the interests of workers. their concerns would be expressed through a structure of representative organisations that would take the concerns to decision making bodies at higher levels of government. once decisions were made they could be passed back down to local or regional levels for implementation. however, the reality was that the local soviets had been undermined as soon as the Bs took power. while soviets continued to exist, they were merely rubber stamping bodies which accepted decisions made by decree from the highest level of the party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

how much personal power did lenin have and how did his health affect this?

A

Lenin’s offical positions in government were chair of the sovnarkom, and one of the politburo members. lenin preferred a collective leadership where issues would be discussed collectively before decisions were made. in 1919 he dismissed the idea he had a personal dictatorship as “utter nonsense”. however he was able to excersise a fairly strong degree of personal power - this was because other Bs looked up to him, so he could force decisions through government by threatening to resign from his positions. however from 1922 onwards his health severely deteriorated. he suffered 3 strokes; after the third in march 1923 he was only able to speak in monosyllables eg “vot vot” (“here here”). by this time other party members were preparing to try and succeed lenin as the next leader of the sovnarkom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what was the nomenklatura system?

A

in order to ensure a truly communist party bureaucracy (civil service) the nomenklatura system was created. many around the country had joined the party to improve career prospects, but were not committedly communist. the nomenklatura tried to solve this by appointing people to jobs based on their perceived commitment to the party. lack of dedication would damage chances of promotion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what was the soviet constitution of 1924?

A

important step in the centralisation of power in the soviet state. by 1922 the Bs had extended influence to many areas of the old russian empire once again. the constitution codified the creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). this was in theory a federal system, but really it centralised party authority in moscow; there were then secondary party bodies in republics such as ukraine.

20
Q

what was the role of terror under lenin?

A

the newly-formed USSR possessed a secret police force that had existed since the Bolshevik takeover as the Cheka, lead by Felix Dzerzhinsky. was formed in 1917 to deal with CRs, sabotage and speculation, and soon after its formation began operating outside the law. after the civil war the Cheka was replaced by the OGPU, in 1922. terror became more bureaucratic and discreet under the OGPU. it also became more inward-looking - focused on bad elements within the party, and large numbers were purged. one of these purges was called the chistka (cleansing) - this happened in 1918.

21
Q

what was the degree of centralisation within the party under lenin?

A

while the party was heavily centralised, absolute central control in a country as huge as russia (not even including the annexed SSRs) was essentially impossible. government was often chaotic - this provided opportunity for local mafias of bolsheviks and black marketeers to defy party orders. there was still debate within the party, eg:
-kamenev and zinoviev opposed lenin’s decision to launch the revolution in 1917.
-fierce debate over whether to accept brest-litovsk in 1918
-debate over how big a role TUs should play from 1917 into the 1920s.

22
Q

how did stalin establish power in the communist party?

A

stalin was laying the basis of his power even before the death of lenin in 1924; he had become general secretary of the party in 1922. he recognised the potential of this position where others did not. being GS allowed stalin to:
-access a vast range of info; eg 26,000 files on party members. he used this against his rivals.
-set agenda for party meetings
-supervised lenin enrolment programme, which recruited industrial workers to the party, who were generally poorly educated. stalin ensured he could identify with the needs/demands of the new recruits; his humble background allowed him to do this.
-arguably most importantly, stalin had the power to appoint people to positions in the party. therefore he was able to promote his supporters to key positions. he was also able to have his opponents dismissed. he had a very large degree of control over the party structure.

23
Q

who were stalin’s main opponents in the politburo?

A

-leon trotsky: considered by many Bs to be the obvious successor. however he was often arrogant to this fact, causing him to lose support
-gregory zinoviev: worked closely with lenin, was party secretary in leningrad. skilled orator but not useful in practical matters
-lev kamanev: party secretary in moscow. same issues as zinoviev
-nikolai bukharin: “golden boy” of the party. young and intelligent, but lacked political experience.
-mikhail tomsky: leading figure in TU movmement, but his influence declined with that of the unions.
-alexei rykov: was the official successor to lenin as chair of the sovnarkom. however his outspoken approach was criticised by other Bs, and he was hampered by a serious drinking problem.

24
Q

how did stalin deal with his opponents?

A

main tactic was to exploit divisions in the party. those on the left (trotsky, kamenev, zinoviev) wanted global revolution and to part with lenin’s economic policy. this group was criticised at the 15th party congress, and were subsequently expelled from the politburo due to “forming factions”. they were expelled from the party entirely after this. kimonev and zinoviev were readmitted in 1928 after renouncing their previous views, but trotsky stuck to his original statements and was exiled to alma-ata, kazakhstan. after this he was expelled from the USSR entirely.
he divided the right over the party over disagreements about replacing the NEP with the first five year plan. Bukharin was accused of forming factions and his influence was considerably reduced.

25
Q

what devices were used in the purges of the 1930s?

A

-the party secretariat. this collected info on party members that could be used to condemn them as enemies of the people.
-the secret police; could carry out surveillance, arrests and executions. also ran gulags (labour camps) where people were imrpisoned. by 1934 the secret police had become the NKVD. its role was more bureaucratic and dominated almost the entire police force.

26
Q

what was the chistka of 1932-35?

A

this was the first major party purge under stalin. it was a response to the difficulties experienced in launching the first 5YP and collectivisation of agriculture. the speed at which these policies were implemented caused concern among some local party officials. if a local branch was unhappy with the orders they had recieved from moscow, they may ignore them. the chistka removed these officials to speed up the implementation of new policy. by 1935, 22% of the party had been removed from their posts. the process was non-violent.

27
Q

was there genuine opposition to stalin in the 1930s?

A

it cannot be denied stalin had a highly paranoid personality: “i trust nobody, not even myself”. this was reflected in the increasingly violent purges against party members under increasingly implausible pretences, eg one member being accused of meeting with co-conspirators in a hotel which had not yet been built.
however, there was some genuine opposition:
-Ryutin was highly critical of Stalin; issued document to members of the CC saying Stalin had a personal dictatorship and that he should be removed immediately.
-Brutality used in collectivisation was criticised. peasant resistance caused serious unrest in ukraine and in the caucasus.
-party officials were critical of the unrealistic targets set by the 5YPs and noted that they could not be reached.
-17th party congress of 1934 - was supposed to celebrate the successes of the first 5YP. however pressure was put on kirov (the up-and-coming leningrad party secretary) to present the criticisms. when he did he received almost equal applause to stalin himself.

28
Q

what was the event that began the great purge?

A

the murder of kirov in 1934. it was committed on 1 december by leonid nikolayev, a party member with a personal grudge against kirov and the party at large. he felt his talents had not been appreciated in the party, and their were also rumours circulating about an affair between kriov and nikolayev’s wife. however the murder was highly suspicious - kirov had been left without his bodyguard at the time of the murder, and nikolayev had been trained to fire a pistol by the NKVD.

29
Q

what were the show trials and what were the details of the main 3 waves?

A

over 1935-36 and 1938, there were several waves of denunciations and arrests of stalin’s opponents, or potential adversaries. initially these were purges of the left of the party. the three waves were:
-the trial of the sixteen: this involved the leaders of the left, including zinoviev and kamenev, in august 1936. they were dragged out of prison and accused of working as agents of trotsky to undermine the state. under intense pressure from the NKVD they confessed to crimes they could not have committed, such as the murder of Kirov. they also implicated others in the conspiracy.
-the trial of the seventeen: purge of party officials such as radek and pyatakov. accused of working for trotsky and foreign governments to undermine the soviet economy through wrecking and sabotage. their real crime was most likely criticising the 5YPs.
the trial of the twenty-one: this was a purge of the right. tomsky had committed suicide before he could be brought to trial, but bukharin and rykov were accused of forming a “trotskyite-rightist bloc”, a crime to which they both confessed. there was no hard evidence of links with trotsky, but bukharin’s article “notes of an economist” made clear some of his criticisms of stalin’s economic policies. he was a threat to stalin and had to go.

30
Q

how were the purges widened after the show trials?

A

-in 1937-38 the purges were widened to the red army. 3/5 of all marshalls were purged, 14/16 army commanders were purged and 35k soldiers were imprisoned or shot. navy lost all admirals. previously many in the army had been critical of collectivisation’s demoralising impact on the peasantry, who made up most of the army. these criticisms concerned stalin due to the growing importance of defence and the army because of hitler taking power in the 1930s.
-the secret police was also purged - due to the growth of the purges, the secret police grew influence. as a result, yagoda was purged in 1936 and replaced by yezhov (“the bloody dwarf”). he purged 3000 of his own personnel. however he was dismissed in 1938 and arrested in 1939 due to stalin needing a scapegoat for the purges.

31
Q

how much control over the party did stalin have in the 1920s and 1930s?

A

stalin had successfully managed to replace every member of the politburo aside from himself between 1924 and the late 1930s. in the place of rivals who could pose a threat to his power were cronies who who would accept his wishes. the arrests and executions of kamanev and zinoviev sent clear messages to other party members who may have wished to oppose stalin. as a result of his control:
politburo met less frequently (1920s P met weekly, mid 1930s met 9 times yearly)
-power became focused in subgroups outside the politburo, which stalin could exercise more control over.
-stalin tended to attend important meetings and pace around as an intimidation tactic - there was genuine (and rational) fear that verbalised opposition to stalin could result in execution.

32
Q

what was important about the soviet constitution of 1936?

A

at face value was highly democratic - every citizen to be given the vote (where kulaks and priests had previously been denied), and freedom of press/religion/organisation. guaranteed employment. in practice, only members of the CCCP were allowed to stand for election, restrictions on civil rights were imposed, etc. the constitution also to a degree aimed to convince prospective allies countries (britain/france) of the USSR’s democratic nature, but the great purge did little to convince other countries of this.

33
Q

what were the limits on stalin’s power in the 1930s?

A

stalin could not persoanlly control every issue in the country - the USSR was far too large for this degree of control.
-stalin could not execute ryutin due to opposition from the politburo
-stalin was forced to accept a redrafting of the second 5yp due to the initial targets being too high.
-kirov was arguably the leader of a more moderate faction of the party before his murder - representative of growing opposition
-there was some vocal opposition to stalin’s use of brutality - eg Kuibyshev, head of gosplan (the state planning authority) - however he died of a heart attack in 1935.

34
Q

how much power did stalin have during the second world war?

A

1941-1945 - some power was decentralised, eg the state defence committee directed the country’s administration, and the military was controlled by stavka, or supreme command. some generals and military personnel were released from gulags so their expertise could be used to win the war. however propaganda was used to appeal to russian nationalism, that often used stalin as a symbol of unity, thereby increasing his power.

35
Q

what was high stalinism?

A

1945-53: end of stalin’s life and time as leader of the USSR. highly centralised and authoritarian control was re-established after the end of WW2. there was a surge of rival members of the politburo, perhaps the most significant of which being beria. stalin attempted to limit beria’s influence with the mingrelian affair of 1951 was a purge of party officials in georgia which included beria’s allies. the politburo was renamed to the presidium and was enlarged from 10 to 36 members. this may have been so stalin could install more of his allies into the highest level of party administration in order to combat new rivals like beria.
stalin may have been attempting another major purge before his death. in 1953 a large group of doctors were arrested and accused of attempting to assassinate the leadership. there is speculation that this was the beginning of a campaign against soviet jews, but the more likely explanation is that this was the beginning of beria’s elimination. stalin may have accused the NKVD of negligence due to the supposed actions of the doctors. this negligence would have linked to beria due to him being the leader of the secret police. stalin died before any of this could happen. stalin’s power had been in decline since 1945 and could only really be maintained through use of terror.

36
Q

what happened in terms of party leadership after the death of stalin?

A

when stalin died in 1953, members of the presidium (formerly politburo) formed a collective leadership. the main people involved were beria, malenkov and khrushchev. initially it was beria who seemed to be leading developments. although he was head of secret police (an obvious safety concern for rivals), he moved quickly to reduce the role of terror. 1,000,000 prisoners on short sentences were released, and the doctor’s plot was denounced as false with the doctors arrested being released. in june 1953, beria was arrested on accusation of being a british spy and executed. this was illegal, but an act the presidium deemed necessary to restore “socialist legality”.
following the collective leadership, khrushchev became first secretary (title that replaced GS) of the CCCP and used the position to place his allies in the presidium. he also paid attention to the central committee - almost half of CC members were removed and most of the new members were supporters of K. he had outmanoeuvred his main opponents by 1956.

37
Q

what was the secret speech?

A

in 1956 at the 20th party congress, K delivered a speech criticising stalin; this was unheard of in the USSR from an official like K. he criticised stalin’s use of a COP, acting as a tyrant, using excessive terror and economic mismanagement. these criticisms ignored the fact that K and other party officials had risen through the ranks by implementing stalin’s policies.

38
Q

what was de-stalinisation?

A

for K, the soviet system needed to be rejuvinated with a return to the legality of leninism. these reforms became known as de-stalinisation, and included:
-resumation of regular presidium and CC meetings which had been greatly reduced under stalin
-moves maed to decentralise decision making by giving more power to organisations at a regional level
-party/government officials no longer faced prison for failing to meet targets
-secret police brought firmly under party control (could no longer be used by an individual to further their own interests)
-secret police lost control over labour camps, whose economic resources had bolstered the power of the organisation
-2 million political prisoners were released from the camps between 1953 and 1960. however the process was slow and only 4% of those who had appealed for release on political grounds had been returned to civilian life by 1955.

these were welcome changes to the population, however fear did not entirely disappear - heavy punishments remained for criticism of the party outside of designated levels, and there was an ever-increasing use of surveillance due to increased technology.

39
Q

what was the crisis of 1957?

A

K’s desire to decentralise decision making was contentious because it threatened to reduce the power of party leaders. this resulted in attempt to remove K from power, dubbed “the anti-party coup” by K. the revolt was led by molotov and malenkov, who persuaded the presidium to ask for K’s resignation. however K cunningly argued that only the CC could dismiss him as it was they who appointed him. one of K’s first moves was drastic reformation of CC membership; it was now filled with K’s allies, so the CC rejected the decision to remove K from his position.

this cunning use of power to further K’s own interests was in some ways reflective of stalin’s rise to power, however was different in key ways. K’s rivals were not arrested or executed. molotov became ambassador to mongolia, malenkov became head of electricity.
in march 1958 K became premier of the USSR (i.e. head of the government). this meant he was head of both the party and the state structures. however he was not an all-powerful dictator like stalin was as he was still subject to the authority of the CC, and the criticism of those in the presidium and other parts of the party.

40
Q

what were K’s main reforms of the party after 1957?

A

after staying in power after the attempt to remove him in 1957 K felt confident to push ahead with de-stalinisation. further reforms happened after the 22nd party congress in 1961:
-stalin’s body removed from lenin’s mausoleum in red square
-major purge of local party secretaries
-in 1962 K divided the party into indutrial and agricultural departments - took power away from party officials
-introduced limit on terms party officials could serve to 3 years. caused heavy resentment towards K contributing to his downfall

41
Q

what were the main reasons for the downfall of K, and how did his downfall occur?

A

-growing unpopularity; economic mistakes, back-down during the cuban missile crisis in 1962 led to humiliation.
-K was unpredictable/unprofessional, conduct often depended on mood. he caused a stir in 1960 when he repeatedly banged his shoe on a desk in a debate at the UN.
-failures in agri policy were highlighted with a disastrous harvest in 1963.

the party ended up removing K from his posts as the CC decided not to intervene. his restrictions on the power of party officials made beaureacrats uneasy, so he was removed from power. however, the fact the party was able to remove him in the first place is a testament to the impact K had - arguably his greatest success was the decentralisation of power.

42
Q

how did brezhnev restore stability in 1964?

A

B replaced K as GS. he was seen as a “safe pair of hands”
B was careful to not make the same mistake as K in losing the trust of his colleagues. to avoid this he removed potential rivals from the politburo (changed back to this name in 1966). however this was in a much less extreme way than stalin would have done; rivals were sidelined rather than executed, eg Podgomy given mostly ceremonial position as head of state, Shelepin brought in charge of foreign affairs.
B was ineffective in many ways, however restored a sense of unity to the party by reverting aspects of de-stalinisation that had been frowned upon. eg:
-division of party into agricultural and industrial sections was reverted
-limits on tenure of office were removed
-B’s main principles were collective leadership and “trust in cadres”, result being long, unbroken tenures for party officials. party became main instrument for social mobility, so membership grew from 6.9 million in 1953 to 17 million by 1980. increased political participation.
-desicions could no longer be made by the leader w/o consulting party. B took role of “first among equals” rather than the more decree-like roles previous leaders took.
-soviet constitution of 1977 enshrined right of public to criticise ineffective party secretaries, but posts in party/govt were filled by appointment rather than election

43
Q

how was de-stalinisation further reversed?

A

there was some acknowledgement of stalin’s 100th birthday in 1979.
at the 23rd party congress, the position of first secretary was restored to original title of general secretary. the same happened with the presidium returning to its old name of politburo.

44
Q

what was The Dnepropetrovsk Mafia?

A

during B’s time as GS, he awarded himself various awards of dubious legitimacy, eg lenin peace prize/lenin prize for literature etc. more importantly, B ensured the promotion of his old colleagues from his time as party boss in ukraine. this resulted in cronyism within the party, from the POV of other party officials. it became known as the dnepropetrovsk mafia.

45
Q

how did political stagnation occur under brezhnev?

A

the communist party had developed into an oligarchy under B - the most obvious part of this being the creation of The Dnepropetrovsk Mafia. the system of promoting people within the party was symptomatic of an oligarchy, and also created opportunity for corruption.
the USSR also became a gerontocracy under B - 7 of the 11 politburo members were now over the age of 70. this stagnation of the political system led to much slower economic growth and stagnation in the improvements previously seen in lifting the population from poverty.

46
Q

what was the cotton affair?

A

key example of corruption under brezhnev. millions of roubles were claimed for non-existent cotton in a remote part of the ussr, due to local officials fiddling the figures.

47
Q

what were the features of breznev’s final years, and his 2 successors?

A

B had increasing loss of control reflected in personal life - B’s daughter Galina was involved romantically with “boris the gypsy” a renowned diamond smuggler. brezhnev died in 1982 and was replaced by yuri andropov. dispite his age, A recognised the need for reform, in particular addressing corruption head on. however, he became reliant on a kidney dialysis machine in mid 1983 and was dead by 1984. perhaps there would have been more reform under andropov; before his death he promoted many younger party members who were eager for substantial reform. one of these members was gorbachev, who had been recommended by A as the successor. however the oligarchical politbuto elected chernenko as the successor, a man in his mid-70s dying from emphysema at the time of his appointment as leader. he made essentially no changes in his 13-month leadership and was dead by march 1985.