Russia 1855-94 Flashcards
What was Russian Autocracy like in 1855?
Autocratic
‘little father’ embodying God on Earth
Intertwined Church and State
Reliant upon Orthodox infrastructure to enforce authority
Regime relied on provincial nobility
Civil service careers depended on maintaining status quo
Social situation of Russia in 1855?
Divided by class No freedom of movement Ethnically diverse
How much of government income was from serfs in 1855?
90%
What was the state of the Russian economy in 1855?
Subsistence farmers; strip farming
Serf-reliant
No internal market demand; no wage work
Lack of capital accumulation; inefficient.
Rural vulnerability; yield per hectare half UK’s
Inhospitable land
When was the Crimean war fought?
1853-56?
What was the impact of the Crimean war 1853-56?
Health; Cholera Outdated technology; one musket for two Transport; channel ports faster Army; lacked determination Economic; 3 years of income, print money inflation. 45% spending.
What were the consequences of the Crimean war?
Peasant uprisings escalated
Intelligentsia demanded gap closed
Treaty of Paris humiliation
1 million dead - 250,000 disease alone
What was Alexander II’s nickname?
‘Tsar Liberator’
How many Russian’s dies in the Crimean War?
1 million with 250,000 from Cholera alone.
How much did the Crimean War cost?
3 years of income and 45% of spending.
In what year were the serfs emancipated?
1861
What were Alexander II’s motives for reform?
Liberal influence
Milyutin Brothers
Crimean War
The threat of peasant uprisings
In what ways did Alexander II have ‘liberal influence’ in his life?
‘Romantic poet’ teacher
Traveled Europe
Progressive nobles ‘Party of St Petersburg’
Grand Duke Konstantin
How did the Crimean war lead to the abolition of serfdom?
Humiliation and inefficiency
‘Strengthen state and dignity’
Lacked determination
What did Alexander II say to Moscow nobility in 1856 about emancipation?
He claimed that it was an ‘unjust rumor’ that he wanted emancipation, but it would happen ‘sooner or later’ and so it is important that it ‘comes from above, rather than taken from below’. It showed a contradiction between actions and intentions.
Why was the effect of the decree limited?
Did not grant freedom to state serfs
2 year ‘temporary obligation’
Redemption payments
Confined to the Mir who collected taxes
What were the successes of emancipation?
Allowed an internal economy
Long-term gain with entrepreneurship
Road to prosperity with ‘wage-work’
Prevent Revolution
What were the failures of emancipation?
Feasibility; took longer than anticipated with 15% temporarily obliged 20 years later
Redemption payments amounted to ‘buying freedom’
Technical backwardness persisted with only 50% of serfs producing a surplus in 1878.
Resentment of kulaks
Riots; 647 in 1861
Noble bankruptcies; mortgage land; resentment aired in Zemstva
Was emancipation a success?
Intention was contrary to implication. Legislation failed to allocate adequate land and so perpetuated dependence on the nobility.
Redemption payments strained the agricultural economy, serfs were free but economically enslaved.
Growing noble disillusionment; between 1861 and 1905 peasants lost 1% of land share anually
Between what years did peasants loose 1% of land annually?
1861-1905
How many serfs were still ‘temporarily obliged’ in 1881?
15%
When were state serfs emancipated?
1866
What key areas Alexander II reformed?
Military
Local Government
Censorship
Judiciary
Who was in charge of military reform under Alexander II?
Dmitry Milyutin