Russia Flashcards
Causes of the 1905 Revolution
Bloody Sunday
Russo Japanese War
Wiltes economic Policy
Inherent Weakness
Bloody Sunday
- 22 Jan 1905
- Peaceful March to the Tsars Winter Palace for a petition urging eight hour working day, minimum wage and better treatment
- Soldiers opened fire on the marchers, killed 130
- As a result, strikes broke out in St Petersburg
- Bloody Sunday destroyed the trust and bond between Tsar and people and destroyed image of the Tsar
Russo Japanese war
- 1904-15
- Defeats on land and sea shocked Russian Public
- In Jan 1905, Russia lost at port Aurthur
- War caused shortages of food and fuel, high prices and unemployment
- Upsurge of discontent as Tsarist goct seen as incompetent
Wiltes Economic Policy
- Under wilted industrialisation policy, urban workers and peasants squeezed by high taxes and low wages
- Economic slump after 1900 led to high unemployment and social tension
- Poor harvests in 1900 and 1902 led to starvation and violence in countryside
Inherent Weakness of Tsar
- Revolutionaries wanted a revolution
- Presence of national minorities, peasants and workers who wanted a better economic output, representation and treatment
- Weak ineffective Tsar
Why was the Tsar able to survive the 1905 revolution
Loyalty of Army
Opposition not co-ordinated
Split between liberals and socialists
Middle class fear of violence
Government suppression of opposition
Securing vital loans
Loyalty of Army
- Army received pay and changes to condition of service
- Became loyal to the tsar and helped din putting down the revolution in cities, revolts in the countryside
opposition not coordinated, lack of unity
- Different groups such as peasants, workers and middle class did not combine to provide a coordinated and effective opposition
- Had different aims and purposes and did not act together
Why did the Tsar survive 1905: Split between socialists and liberals
- Liberals wanted political reform and movement towards a constitutional democracy
- Socialists wanted a social revolution, equality
- Liberals felt like they had got what they wanted from the October manifesto
Middle Class fear of violence
- The middle class feared the continuation of violence and disorder
- They wanted the revolution to stop and wanted a return of control and authority
Government suppression of opposition - After 1905
- Govt used brutal, suppressive force to beat the population into submission
- Helped re establish govt control but fuelled the next revolution
urns vital loans
- By end of 1905, govt was in deep financial trouble, lost war and falling tax revenues drove the govt to the brink of financial collapse
- Was able to secure important loans in April 1906 which helped stabilise the economy
- Helped pay for troops who were needed to put down the uprising s and restore order
Why did the autocracy survive the 1905 revolution
1) POLITICAL COHESIONS -
October manifesto, political parties allowed, Share power (Duma)
2) SOCIAL IMPACT -
Middle class gain political voice, conditions do not improve for working class
Freedom of speech and relaxed censorship
3) MILITARY POWER -
Troops return from Russo-japanese war in 1906, allow use of army for repression
Retains military support
4) New Chief minister Stolypin
Did life get better for Russian People (1906-1914)
1) Stolypins Policies
2) Dumas
3) Wittes work
4) Political parties
Stolypins policies
- Repression: Courts and hangings
- Industrial reforms: Continued growth, increased employment but low protection
- Agricultural reforms: loans, tough conditions, only 15% qualified
Dumas
1st: Large number of socialists, dissolved by the Tsar
2nd: Similar to first duma, similar demands, dissolved
3rd: Change in election rules, more conservative
4th: Did not achieve much
Wittes work
- Economic minister
- Responsible for foreign credibility, leading to investment
Did life get better for the Russian People 1906-14 (NO)
AGRICULTURAL REFORMS:
- Only 15% of the peasant population qualified for loans
- Poorer peasants forced to sell land and move to the city
INDUSTRIAL REFORMS:
- Working conditions for the workers did not improve
- Workers employed were mostly children
STOLYPINS POLICIES:
- Increased repression
- Court hangings to suppress peasant uprising
- Stolypins necktie
DUMAS:
- Dumas were dissolved and made increasingly conservative
- Did not benefit socialists
Did life get better for the Russian people 1906-1914 (YES)
AGRICULTURAL REFORMS:
- Peasants allowed to consolidate strips of land
- Benefited the rich peasants, kulaks
INDUSTRIAL REFORMS:
- Employment and industrial output increased
DUMAS:
- Satisfied upper middle class
WITTES ECONOMIC WORK:
- Brought foreign investment for industry
Political parties
Socialist democrats:
- Revolutionaries
- Working class would drive revolution
- Split in 1903: Bolsheviks (Rapid revolution led by a small group) and Mensheviks (Mass movement)
Liberals:
- Constitutional, democratic, middle class
- Non-violent
Socialist revolutionaries
- Supported by peasants
- Land reforms for peasants
- Overthrow Tsar
- Violent
Overall public oppinion
- Mixed public oppinion for nobility, rich peasants and middle class: Loss faith in autocracy and tsars comparison to god
- Lower class peasants and working class against tsar, conditions did not improve, duma did not satisfy demands enough
How did WW1 contribute to the Tsars downfall
POLITICAL:
- Tsars decision to leave tsarina uncharge drew criticism due to poor resource management and tsarinas German background
- Influence of Rasputin tainted autocracy reputation
- Tsarina continued to suppress Dumas, provoking political anger
- Poor handling of economy and military was criticised
MILITARY:
- Tsars decision to take over as commander in chief made him personally responsible for defeats
- Heavy defeats in 1914 and 1915 led to disillusionment and anger
- Loss of officers led to more peasants in uniform who lacked sense of nationalism and support for the Tsar
- Lack of morale made military unwilling to defend Tsar
SOCIO ECONOMIC:
- Railways were used to supply goods to frontline, leading to lack of resources in cities
- Loss of land led to less land for growing crops
- Less produce for peasants and workers as resources had to be supplied to soldiers at the front
- Less workforce for food production
Unified opposition 1917 revolution
Nobility - Losing war
Middle Class - Loss of power of Duma, Governing of Tsarina
Peasants - Tsar is not protectors psychological and physical impacts, lack of resources
Workers - Poorer working conditions, radicalised be extreme parties, lack of resources
Armed forces: Poor morale, no longer willing to defend Tsar, scared of deployment
Why were the bolsheviks successful in October/November 1917
Role of Lenin and propaganda
The war
Kornilov Coup
Failure of provisional government
Revolution led by Trotsky
Inherent weakness of PG
Role of Lenin and propoganda
- Made a speech demanding that there should be no cooperation with PG, war should end, land should be given to peasants, soviets should take power
- Bolsheviks developed slogans ‘bread, peace and land’ and ‘all power to the soviet’, effective propoganda
- Lenin speeches, April theis
The war
- Kerensky launched huge attack in June which was a disaster
- Peasant soldiers wanted to take control of land, led to rise in desertation
- Military failure sparks July days uprising were PG is forced to use force against people by sending troops
Kornilov Coup
- General Kornilov, head of army decides to march into Petrograd with troops to set up own government
- Kerensky asked bolsheviks for help and armed Red Army with rifles
- Fighting did not occur as railway workers stopped them
- Portrays kerenskys weakness of army not supporting him
- Bolsheviks seen as saviours, rise to political stage
- Gain weapons