Rump; political divisions and religious radicalism (1649-1653) Flashcards
Between years is the Rump Parliament active?
1649-1653
Why was Charles executed, in terms of his own behaviour?
- Charles refused to acknowledge the authority of the show court.
- Charles’ refusal to plea meant the Rump had no choice other than to execute the ‘tyrant’.
- Charles had proven himself to be untrustworthy and duplicitous, and it was his character traits which ultimately led to his demise.
- He had rejected at least 7 different offers of settlement (including during his trial) but had never seriously negotiated in good faith.
Why was Charles executed, in terms of Parliament’s and the NMA’s perception towards him?
- The NMA felt a parliamentary majority may restore an untrustworthy and vengeful king, and any settlement would betray the cause they had fought for.
- He had not accepted God’s judgement, that he was ‘Charles Stuart, that man of blood’. The King had started the Second Civil War (with the Scots).
- The NMA had grown in religious radicalism, and it was the militancy of this minority which initiated the ‘purge’ in late 1648.
Why did the Rump face immediate and serious challenges from 1649?
Monarchy was still popular throughout the Three Kingdoms (both the Scottish and Irish announced Charles was still their King in spirit, proclaiming support for the Stuarts, offering the crown to Charles II)
What bases of support were the interregnum regimes built on?
The interregnum regimes were built of narrow bases of support
- Lacked popular support (only really won grudging cooperation)
- Lack of legitimacy meant they always relied on the army for support
> The martyrdom of Charles posed substantial difficulties for the legitimacy of the government in the Interregnum.
Why was the Rump viewed as illegitimate?
The Rump was viewed as illegitimate by many as it was not truly representative, and only existed because of a military coup.
- Upsurge of royalist support in Scotland and Ireland
Why did the trial and execution of Charles marked a significant turning point, in terms of perception of the monarchy?
Led to the de-sacralisation of the monarchy (divorced the monarchy from religion, with the public regicide destroying the notion of the DRoK)
What is Cromwell’s political profile?
Lord Protector of England from 1654-1658
> Offered, and refused, the Crown itself
Took command of the New Model Army from 1650 (from Fairfax), which was full of religious radicals.
What did historian Morrill state about Cromwell, and what does this imply?
“Cromwell was a unique blend of religious radical and social conservative” - Morrill
> Morill implies that there’s a contradiction; you can’t be a social conservative and religious radical simultaneously
What two things are Cromwell was motivated by?
- a desire to ‘heal and settle’
- the pursuit of a ‘godly reformation’
What were Cromwell’s religious sympathies in the 1630s and 1640s?
Cromwell was a Puritan in the 1630s, and a part of the Independents, a more radical Puritan group, in the 1640s.
- He had suffered under Laud, was committed to a Calvinist CofE, but was willing to tolerate the other religious non-conformity of other Protestants
- He was considered a radical because he supported religious toleration for all Protestants (i.e. Baptists, Quakers, Seekers, Ranters, Millenerians)
What two things did Cromwell want socially?
- Wanted power in society to remain intact
- Wanted his regime to secure the support and allegiance of the traditional ruling elites (i.e. landlords, MPs)
What was the problem with Cromwell also being a republican and a regicide?
- This became a huge problem because there was a popular belief in monarchy, and Cromwell had no links to it.
- The NMA were a ‘meritocratic’ army, challenging the traditional hierarchy
> The NMA were also full of religious radicals, people promoted on ‘godliness’ (not necessarily meritocratic)
What immediate problems did Cromwell face in terms of religion (independent sects, independency and Anglicanism)
- Cromwell’s toleration of Independent sects seemed to threaten social order (a world ‘turned upside down’)
- Radical Independency was associated with the NMA and its ‘meritocracy’, which upset social hierarchy
- Most of the larger landlords were Anglican, not radical at all; even most Puritan landlords felt Cromwell’s religious stance/Independency was too radical.
What percentage of the population belonged to Independent sects?
2-4%
What did the vast majority of religion still attend, in terms of the Church?
The vast majority still attended regular Anglican Church services, used the Book of Common Prayer, etc
Why was Cromwell’s independency not popular?
It was associated with the chaos of the civil wars, and people wanted a return to normalcy.
What does the Rump Parliament refer to?
Rump Parliament refers to those MPs remaining post-Pride’s Purge
Why was the Rump viewed as illegitimate?
Viewed as illegitimate as it was unrepresentative and existed as a result of a military coup.
What happens in January 1649 for the Rump?
70 or so remaining MPs declared the Rump ‘the supreme power in this nation’ with the authority to pass Acts of Parliament without the consent of the King or the Lords
What happened in February 1649?
a 41-strong Council of State was established to take executive decisions; in practice, the number attending meetings was always far smaller than 41, although 9 was the minimum.
- The position of President was rotated monthly.
What was the Council of State?
The Council of State was essentially the executive body of the English Commonwealth, formed after the abolition of the monarchy in 1649.
- It acted as the replacement for the King’s Privy Council, directing foreign and domestic policy during the republic.
What did the Rump Parliament do in March 1649?
March 1649; it abolished the monarchy, the Privy Council and the House of Lords.
- The Rump Parliament (with only about 50 active members) declared monarchy “unnecessary, burdensome and dangerous”
- The House of Lords was dismissed as “useless” and “dangerous”
What did the Rump Parliament in May 1649?
It declared the people of England to be a ‘Commonwealth and Free State’, governed by a single chamber Parliament, without a monarch.