Rules of Inference Flashcards

1
Q

A

Therefore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Suppose “p and q” is True. Then it must be the case that both alone are True.

A

Conjunctive Simplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“p ∧ q” ⇒ “p”

A

Conjunctive Simplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

You can simplify a conjunction inside parenthesis.

A

FALSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The statement “The sky is blue OR I did my homework.” is True regardless of whether I did my homework or not.

A

Disjunctive Amplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can mean the post-condition is True whenever the pre-condition is True.

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“p” ⇒ “p ∨ q”

A

Disjunctive Amplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

You cannot amplify inside parenthesis

A

TRUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The sky is blue. Pigs cannot fly. Thus, the sky is blue, and pigs cannot fly.

A

Rule of Conjunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“(p)” ∧ “(q)” ⇒ “p ∧ q”

A

Rule of Conjunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When using conjunction use full statements. If negation is involved with conjunction, ___ should probably be used instead.

A

amplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Affirmation of an implication.

A

Modus Ponens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Suppose we know that
▶ “If I did my homework, then I will go to the movies.” AND
▶ “I did my homework.”
Then we can affirm that “I will go to the movies.”

A

Modus Ponens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“(p)” ∧ “(p → q)” ⇒ “q”

A

Modus Ponens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Denying of an implication

A

Modus Tollens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Suppose we know that
▶ “If I did my homework, then I will go to the movies.” AND
▶ “I will not go to the movies.”
Then we should be able to state that “I did not do my homework.”

A

Modus Tollens

17
Q

Ensures that implication we know to be True is not violated by a pre-condition.

A

Modus Tollens

18
Q

“(¬q)” ∧ “(p → q)” ⇒ “¬p”

A

Modus Tollens

19
Q

Satisfying a Disjunction using partial information.

A

Disjunctive Syllogism

20
Q

Suppose we know that
▶ “I did not do my homework or I will go to the movies.” AND
▶ “I did my homework.”
Then we should be able to state that “I will go to the movies.”

A

Disjunctive Syllogism

21
Q

Ensures that a Disjunction remains True, if one part is False.

A

Disjunctive Syllogism

22
Q

“(¬p)” ∧ “(p ∨ q)” ⇒ “q”

A

Disjunctive Syllogism

23
Q

Implication has a transitive sort of behavior.

A

Syllogism

24
Q

Suppose we know that
▶ “If I do my homework, then I will pass.” AND
▶ “If I pass, then I will go to the movies.”
Then we should be able to state that “If I do my homework, then I will go to the movies.”

A

Syllogism

25
Q

“(p → q)” ∧ “(q → r)” ⇒ “p → r”.

A

Syllogism

26
Q

To show equivalence using Rules of Inference…

A

2 proofs are needed

▶ The forward direction (⇒)
▶ The reverse direction (⇐)