rules of criminal law Flashcards

1
Q

what is the definition of the actus reus

A

the actus reus is the guilty act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the definition of mens rea

A

mens rea means guilty mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the standard of proof in a criminal cases

A

beyond reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the standard of proof in a civil cases

A

the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is a conduct crime

A

doesn’t need a consequence it be a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is a consequence crime

A

a crime that needs a consequence to be a crime s47 OAPA 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what case tells is about the voluntary actus reus

A

Hill v Baxter 1958

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what case tells is about involuntariness of a crime

A

R v Larsonneur 1933

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the 6 omissions of actus reus and there correlating case law

A

statutory, contractual v Pittwood 1902, duty due to relationship r v Gibbs and Proctor, duty which is taken on voluntarily Stone and Dobinson, duty through an official position r v dytham, a duty which arises form a chain of events r v miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the test for factual causation

A

But for R v white

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the thin skill rule and what case correlates?

A

The defendant must leave the victim as they found them R v Blaue 1975

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what 3 elements break the chain of causation

A

Act of a 3rd party, victims own act, an act of god, natural unpredictable event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what case explains when medical care breaks COC

A

R v Jordan 1956

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the definition of specific intent and what case defines it

A

decision to bring the accused power no matter of the accused consequence r v mohan 1975

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the definition of direct intent. what is the case that correlates

A

The D wanted s specific consequence to occur( Hancock & Shackland 1986)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the definition of oblique intent and what case correlates

A

was harm a virtual certainty (1) was the d aware of this(2) r v Woollen

16
Q

what case changed the definition of s8 of the criminal justice act 1967

A

Wollin changed the word “Infer” to “find” intention

17
Q

what case defines recklessness

A

R v Cunningham 1957

18
Q

what is the definition of negligence

A

a failure to meet the standards of the reasonable man.( r v Adomako 1994)

19
Q
A