fatal offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are the three aspect if the actus rea of murder

A

An unlawful killing(1) of a reasonable creature(2) under the kings peace(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is defined in Malcherek and steel (1981)

A

brain death is classed as death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the mens rea of murder

A

Express malice aforethought intention to kill and implied malice aforethought intention to cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what case can used for the intention to cause GBH is sufficient for murder

A

R v Cunningham 1981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the sentencing for murder and where will the sentencing be found

A

a whole life sentence/ Schedule 21 of sentencing act 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does a partial defence to murder do and what section defines it

A

It reduces the charge to voluntary manslaughter. S 54(1) CJA 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what type of offence is murder

A

muder is a specific intent offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the 3 requirements of loss of control

A

1: loss of self control 2: a qualifying trigger and 3: * D’s sex and age normal capacity for tolerance self-restraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is classed as a qualifying trigger for loss of controll

A

Fear anger ( subjective test), anger( objective test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what cannot be classed as a qualifying trigger?

A

sexual infidelity and revenge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what case can be used for sexual infidelity

A

r v clinton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what 4 things are needed for Diminished responsibility to be present?

A

suffering from a mental abnormality, recognised mental condition, substantially impair one ore mores of D’s abilities and does D’s impairment badly contribute to his conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 2 requirements for gross negligance manslaughter

A

1) a duty to the victim, 2) must cause the vitcims death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the outcome that was found in R v adomako

A

The defendent’s actions were grossly negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the role of the jury in determening Gross negligence mansluaghter?

A

1) whether the conduct of the defendant is capable of being defined as criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In diminished responsibility who need to prove standard of proof

A

its on the Defendant

17
Q

what are the two types of involuntery manslaughter

A

1) Gross negligence and unlawful act

18
Q

what are the 4 requirements for unlawful act manslaughter

A

1) must have committed and unlawful act,2) objectively manslaughter,3) must cause death, 4) must have they required mens rea

19
Q

which types of causation must apply to unlawful a t manslaughter

A

factual and legal causation

20
Q

name at least 3 cases for unlawful act manslaughter

A

1) r v Franklin, 2) R v lamb( must be a criminal offence to give rise to liability , 3) R v Lowe

21
Q

what case defines dangerous for unlawful act manslaughter

A

R v Church( would a reasonable person see the act as dangerous)

22
Q

what are the 4 requirements for diminshed responsibility

A

1) is D suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning, 2) Does D’s abnormality of mental functioning arise from a recognised medical condition, 3) did his abnormality of brain function sunstantially impair one or more of D’s abilities, 4) signifcantly contribute to D’s conduct

23
Q

what was the outcome in R v byrne

A

The defendnets abnormality functioning must be so different to an ordinary human.

24
Q

what was the outcome in R v Golds?

A

the jury can decide whether or not the impairment in the case is substantial

25
Q

what was the outcome of R v Dowds

A

voluntary intoxication will not be considered a recognised medical condition.

26
Q

what was the outcome in r v Dietschmann

A

despite the drink, his mental abnormality sunstantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts

27
Q
A