Rules + Elements Of Criminal Law (done) Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 4 categories of law ?

A

1) Procedural laws
2) Substantive laws
3) Public laws
4) Private laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define procedural laws

A

They prescribe the framework in which laws are made and enforced e.g PACE 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define substantive laws

A

They create and define legal rights and obligations e.g the law on criminal offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define public laws

A

They govern the relationship between the state and its citizens e.g procedural laws defining the powers of parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define private laws

A

They create rights enforceable between individuals e.g trespassing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who has the burden of proof in criminal law?

A

The prosecution has the burden of proof. However the burden of proof shifts to the defence if they are trying to proof a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the standard of proof required in criminal law?

A

‘beyond all reasonable doubt’ meaning the jury must be 99.9% certain that D is guilty to prosecute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are examples of the powers of sentencing a court has? (4)

A

Prison, community order, fine, driving ban

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the actus reus?

A

The physical element of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must the actus reus be for a crime to have been committed?

A

Voluntary (Hill v Baxter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Would an omission carry criminal liability?

A

No as stated by Stephen J in the 19th century unless D has a duty to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 6 common law situations where there is a duty to act (and cases)?

A

1) Contractual duty (Pittwood)

2) Duty through relationship (Gibbons & Proctor)

3) Duty taken on voluntarily (Stone & Dobinson)

4) Duty through one’s official postition (Dytham)

5) Duty through the creation of danger (Miller)

6) Duty through combination of public policy factors (Willoughby)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is causation in fact proved?

A

Through the ‘but for’ test (Pagett)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is causation in law proved?

A

Questions whether D’s actions were the most significant cause or was there an intervening act (Jordan)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the 4 potential breaks in the chain of causation (and cases)?

A

1) Third party actions which are unforeseeable/unlikely (Pagett)

2) V’s actions if they are unreasonable/unforeseeable (Williams)

3) Medical treatment which is ‘so potent to death/injury that it deems D’s actions insignificant’ (Cheshire)

4) Thin skull rules states ‘D must take their victim as they find them’ (Blaue)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the mens Rea?

A

The mental element of the crime

17
Q

What are the 2 levels of intention?

A

• Intention
• Subjective Recklessness

18
Q

What are the 2 types of intention and their definitions?

A

• Direct intention where it is D’s main aim or purpose (Mohan)

• Oblique intention where the Woolin test is used, ‘Did D foresee the consequences as a virtual certainty’

19
Q

Define subjective recklessness

A

Taking an unjustified risk. We ask ‘did D realise the risk and decide to take that risk anyway?’ (Cunningham)

20
Q

What is transferred malice?

A

A legal concept that transfers D’s men’s Rea from his intended victim to the actual victim (Latimer)

21
Q

What is required to establish transferred malice?

A

The type of offence must be the same (Pembliton)

22
Q

What are strict liability offences?

A

When the courts initially assume that the men’s Rea is required and then look at points of the case to decide if it should be made an offence made of strict liability (no mens Rea required)

23
Q

What are the gammon tests and what case established them?

A

• Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v AG for Hong Kong (1985)
• These tests start with the presumption that mens rea is required and then consider determine if that presumption can be rebutted and it can become a strict liability offence.

24
Q

What are absolute liability offences?

A

No men’s Rea is required for the offences and the actus reus does not need to be voluntary (Larsonneur 1933)

25
What are the justifications for struct/absolute liability offences? (4)
1) Only minor offences - speeding, parking, minor motoring offences - lack of blameworthiness can be taken into account when sentencing 2) Important to protecting society by promoting careful behaviour 3) No social stigma attached to offences 4) Easier to prove/enforce - saves courts time & money
26
What are the arguments against strict/absolute liability offences? (4)
1) Unfair - liability should not be imposed on those who are blameless 2) Those who have taken all possible care should not be penalised 3) There is no evidence that it improves standards/protects society 4) Its contrary to principles of human rights
27
What is the contemporaneity rule?
Contemporaneity means ‘at the same time’ if the actus reus and mens rea do not coincide then no crime has been committed (Fagan 1969)
28
Is there any defences available for strict liability
No ‘due diligence’ defences will be available (Harrow LBC v Shah & Shah 1999)
29
Can the contemporaneity rule apply to the creation of dangerous situations?
Yes if there is a failure to act (Miller 1983)
30
What happened in the case of Fagan 1969?
The actus reus was formed before the men’s Rea however as the actus reus continued once the men’s Rea was formed there was a crime committed
31
What happened in the case of Thabo 1954?
The men’s Rea continued through a series of events when the actus reus was committed so there was a crime committed (single transactional view)