RSM Flashcards
what is politics?
process by which people make decisions, process to distribute resources and generate legitimacy
what is ontology?
“the image of social reality upon which a theory is based” (Grix)
what is epistemology (Bryman)?
“the possible ways of gaining knowledge of social reality - claims about how what is assumed to exist can be known”
What did Bennett et al find about political science journals?
49% used quantitative methods
46% used qualitative methods
23% used formal modelling
(some used multimethods)
what is objectivism?
Social phenomena and their meanings have an existence outside of social actors
what is constructivism?
social phenomena and their meanings are continually being made and remade by social actors
what is interpretivism?
Needs to grasp ‘the subjective meaning of social action’ (Bryman)
What do interpretivists say about subjectivity?
Inevitable
What is the double heremeneutic? (Giddens)
World is interpreted by the actor, who is then interpreted by the observer
What do foundationalists argue?
World is composed of discrete objects that exist independently of it
What do Lakoff and Johnson suggest?
The existence of objective, absolute and unconditional truths
What are 3 key features of anti-foundationalists? (Guba and Lincolm)
1) realities are local and specific
2) reality isn’t discovered but constructed
3) while it is actors who construct the world, their values are shaped by cultural, social and political processes
What did the scientific approach to politics try to do?
Identify causal statements
What are causal statements?
Under a version set of conditions, there would be regular and predictable outcomes
What’s the difference between critical realism and positivism?
critical realists believe structural relationships between social phenomena cannot be observed, and only the consequences can be seen, whereas positivists believe in coming up with causal statements
What’s the similarity between critical realism and positivism?
Share a broad ontological position
What are epistemological distinctions important?
Cannot be removed when doing research
What ontology is positivism related to?
Foundationalist
What is positivism associated with? (3)
- behaviouralism
- rational choice theory
- certain strains of institutionalism
What do positivists say about objectivity?
researchers need to aim to be objective
How does Quine criticise positivism? (2)
Theory and empirical research aren’t separable, as theory informs what we focus on
No way to describe experience without classifying it, as any knowledge we derive from the 5 senses is mediated by the concepts we use to analyse it
How can we see social ‘science’ as being impossible? (3)
1) they don’t exist independently of the activities they shape, 2) don’t exist independently of actors views of what they are doing and 3) the social world varies across time and space in most instances
what is post-positivism? (Sanders) (2)
- Acknowledge the independence of theory and observation and recognise the importance of normative questions
- Also accepts interpretation and meaning
what ontology is interpetivism related to?
anti-foundationalist
what positions are interpetivism related tp?
some forms of institutionalism and feminism
what do interpretivists believe about objectivity?
impossible to be objective, and so researcher must recognise their own partialities and take these into account when interpreting their respondents
what do interpretivists want to focus on?
identifying discourses to see how they interpret social phenomena
how do positivists view intepretivism?
merely offers opinions, with no basis to check validity of the findings
why has the interpretivist tradition become more common? (2)
Philosophical critiques questioned positivism more
Normative political theory changed from being foundationalist to anti-foundationalist
what ontological position does critical realism take?
foundationalism
what epistemological position does critical realism take?
anti-foundationalism
what do critical realists believe? (3)
World exists independent of us
Social phenomena do have causal powers, so causal statements are possible
However, not all social phenomena can be observed, and what can be observed may provide a false image about what is actually happening
how can critical realism be linked to Marxism?
there is a difference between ‘real’ interests and perceived interests – only able to enquire about perceived interests
how do interpetivists criticise critical realists? (2)
criticise ontological claims of realism, believe there are no structures independent of social action
how do positivists criticise critical realists? (2)
deny the existence of unobservable structures, knowledge claims of realists are untestable
what do modern critical realists try to do? whats an issue with their approach?
Attempts to combine scientific and interpretivist traditions – very difficult as they have fundamentally different ontological and epistemological positions
what do modern critical realists believe about social phenomena?
Whilst social phenomena exist independent of our interpretation of the, it does affect their outcomes – don’t determine, but constrain and facilitate
why does a researcher’s ontological and epistemologicial position matter? (3)
- Determine the role of theory in their research
- Shape the way the researcher sees the relationship between theory and practice
- Affect what the researcher expects in their research (eg generalizability etc)
what is deliberate democracy?
define democracy as a communication process, whereby participants exchange reasons for their preferences, rather than solely voting on them
what was deliberate democracy first developed as?
a normative project
what is the positivist view on deliberate democracy? (Mutz) (2)
What makes a theory good is its falsifiability
Deliberate democracy theory needs to be broken down, and each part given a hypothesis and tested in order to find out which factors produce desirable outcomes
what is the interpretivist view on deliberate democracy? (4)
- Capture the perspectives better, and is sensitive to the contextual and contingent natures of such processes
- No need to aim for generalizability / causal relationships
- Focuses more on agency
- Theory allows interpretivists to make sense of the practice
what is agency (or intentionalism)?
capacity of individual humans to act independently and make their own free choices
what is structure?
refers to those factors that seem to limit or influence, the opportunities that individuals have
how can the structure/agency debate be seen in regards to the fall of the Berlin wall?
structural: economic stagnation,
forces of international policies
agency: Gorbachev’s policies,
actions of civil rights/ protest movements groups,
actions of GDR citizens themselves
(In)actions of GDR leadership
what do political scientists hope to get from the agency/structure debate?
not looking for a solution, just to be aware of the forces involved
what is structuralism?
Societies can be analysed as a system , in order to explain individual actions
what does Althusser have to say about social reality?
a (very) complex interaction of economic political and ideological forces, which all have relative autonomy from each other, however individuals are slaves to these structures which they don’t even realise
what is rational choice theory?
humans are rational beings, who make calculations about the best course of action and choose the best for themselves
what is public choice theory?
Politicians and bureaucrats will seek to maximise their own interests
what does pluralism hope to achieve?
to emphasise dispersed nature of power and that notion that no single interest can dominate, all about conflict resolution
what is Giddens’ structuration theory?
arguing the two aren’t separate entities, mutually dependent and internally related, structure exists through agency and agents also have rules that they have no choice but to abide by, two sides of the same coin
why did Giddens’ come up with the structuration theory?
to bridge the divide between structuralists and intentionalists
what are the 5 broad theories of the structure vs agency debate?
- Structuralism/materialism
- Intentionalism/idealism
- A dialectic position
- An additive position
- Post-structuralist position
what is a dialectic position to structure vs agency?
opposing views working together to find the truth
what is an additive position to structure vs agency?
associated with positivist and empiricist position, both structural and intentional factors influence voting decisions
what is the postmodernist position to structure vs agency?
structures don’t exist without agent’s discourse, distinction between structure and agency is not ontological
what did Bell and Hindmoor say about context?
see the broader economic, political and institutional context of the time as constraining the government
what did Archer focus on?
reflexivity, ‘agents deliberate upon a precise course of action in view of their concerns and in light of the circumstances they confront’
what does Bell focus on?
focuses on the capacities individuals must use the resources at their disposal, to utilise their agency
what was Archer’s approach?
Morphogenetic approach
what does the Morphogenetic approach entail?
three stage cycle: T1, structural conditioning, T2, social interaction and T3, structural elaboration. At T4, the structural changes are either changed or, much less likely, not changed, disagrees that there is any ontological separation between agency and structure
what was Hay’s approach?
the strategic relational approach
what does the strategic relational approach entail?
both don’t have an existence without each other, not two sides of a coin but two metals in the alloy from which the coin was made, structure has no independent causal power, core of the approach ‘is the interaction between strategic actors and the strategic context within which they find themselves’