Romanian orphan studies (Rutter): Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards

1
Q

what is Institutionalisation

A

Institutionalisation concerns the effects upon attachments of care provided by orphanages and residential children’s homes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does Institutionalisation not provide

A

Institutional care does not adequately provide the level of positive individual attention and emotional care from consistent caregivers, which is essential for the successful emotional, physical, mental, and social development of children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who has seen to be most affected by institutionalised care

A

This is profoundly relevant for children under 3 years of age for whom institutional care has been shown to be especially damaging.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does Institutional care involve

A

Institutional care involves distinctive patterns of attachment behaviour and often involves a mix of privation and deprivation effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Context: Romanian Orphans

A

In 1966 the Romanian government, under the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, tried to boost the population of Romania by encouraging parents to have large families and also by banning abortion.

The consequence of this was that many babies could not be cared for by their families.

When the regime collapsed in 1989, the Western world became aware of the plight of the orphans in institutional care in Romania.

There were more than 100,000 orphans in 600 state-run orphanages.
The children spent their days alone in cribs with very little stimulation - cognitive or emotional. They were malnourished and uncared for.
Many were adopted by Western families.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were conditions like in the orphanages?

A

Although there were variations among institutions, the variation was from poor to abysmal, with none providing good conditions:
- Staffing levels were very low (about 1 staff per 30 children)
- There were virtually no toys or educational activities
- Staff-child interaction and communication was minimal
- Feeding was mainly by means of propped up bottles with large teats
- Washing involved being hosed down with cold water

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the attachment types

A

Disinhibited attachment: Clingy, attention-seeking behaviour and indiscriminate sociability to adults (equally friendly and affectionate to people they know well or strangers).

Disorganised attachment: Inconsistent behaviour, confusion and indecision (a mixture of approach and avoidance behaviours), demonstrated in research by Zeanah et al. (2005).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the cognitive effects

A

Intellectual disability
Low IQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the physical effects

A

Poor physical development – restricted growth. The production of hormones, such as growth hormones, are affected by the severe emotional disturbance (rather than poor nourishment) resulting in physical underdevelopment (or ‘deprivation dwarfism’).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the effects on parenting

A

Quinton et al. (1984) – Followed a group of women who had been reared in institutions. These ex-institutional women experienced extreme difficulties when they became parents – for example, their children were more frequently in care and the women were less sensitive, less supportive and less warm with their children than a control group of non-institutionalised women who were also observed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the effects on relationships later in life

A

Impaired adult relationships – individuals might struggle to form or maintain peer or romantic relationships due to a lack of a/poor/negative internal working model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the aim of Rutter et al. (1998)’s study

A

To assess whether loving and nurturing care could reverse the effects of privation the children had suffered in Romanian orphanages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the procedure of Rutter et al. (1998)’s study

A

The participants were 111 Romanian orphans
It was a longitudinal study, incorporating a quasi-experiment
The IV was the age of adoption, with three conditions:
Condition 1: Children adopted before the age of 6 months
Condition 2: Children adopted between 6 months and 2 years
Condition 3: Children adopted after 2 years (before 42 months)
The DV was the children’s level of cognitive functioning
The orphans were initially assessed for height, head circumference and cognitive functioning on arrival in Britain. All children were again assessed at age 4, using a combination of parental reports, direct observations, and psychometric assessments.
A control group of 52 non-institutionalised British children adopted before 6 months were also assessed (to ascertain whether negative effects were due to separation from carers or the institutional conditions in Romanian orphanages).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what were the findings of Rutter et al. (1998)’s study

A

~50% of the Romanian orphans were found to have deficits in their cognitive functioning at initial assessment and most were underweight. The control group did not show these deficits.
The catch-up in both physical growth and cognitive level appeared nearly complete at 4 years for those children who came to the UK before the age of 6 months – they were doing as well as the British adopted children. The developmental catch-up was also impressive, but not complete, in those placed after 6 months of age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were the conclusion of Rutter et al. (1998)’s study

A

The negative effects of institutionalisation can be overcome by sensitive, nurturing care.
However, age at adoption was negatively correlated with attainment of developmental milestones i.e. the later the children were adopted, the slower their progress – the longer children experience emotional deprivation, the longer it will take them to recover, but recovery is possible.
As the British adopted children (who had been separated from their mothers) did not suffer developmental outcomes, it can be seen that separation from carers will not on its own cause negative developmental effects.
The marked improvement in functioning amongst the Romanian orphans following entry to the UK adoptive families provided good evidence that the initial deficits were due to some aspect of the institutional deprivation that they had experienced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

:(Ongoing research:

A

We can’t currently draw conclusions from this study about the long-term effects of institutionalisation. However, this research is ongoing and should be able to provide a greater understanding as participants grow up.

17
Q

:(Only some of the children received detailed clinical investigations,

A

so it is difficult to fully generalise the findings to others.

18
Q

:(Lack of control:

A

Extraneous variables e.g. ‘ good’ temperament of the child or a child with seemingly less problems, may be adopted sooner. Furthermore, some of the children may have received special attention at the institution, perhaps because they smiled more and so this would mean that they did have some early attachment experiences. This may explain improvements in the child’s physical, cognitive and social functioning, rather than the care provided by adoptive parents. Ultimately, some children are not as strongly affected as others by institutionalisation i.e. there are individual differences, which were not accounted for

19
Q

:(Because the children were not studied while in the Romanian orphanages, it is not possible to state which aspects of privation/institutional care were most influential/detrimental…

A

The Romanian orphans were faced with much more than emotional deprivation. The physical conditions were appalling, which impacted their health. The lack of cognitive stimulation would also have affected their development.
There are multiple risk factors and it may have been the lack of stimulation rather than the absence of maternal care that led to retarded development.

20
Q

Subsequent follow-ups confirmed that significant deficits remain in a substantial minority of individuals who experienced institutional care beyond the age of 6 months.

A

Rutter et al. (2001) followed up the same children at age 6, finding quasi-autism, disinhibited attachment, inattention/overactivity, and cognitive impairment to be associated with institutionalisation, especially in children enduring long periods of institutionalisation (i.e. adopted after 6 months), though 20% of such children showed normal functioning.

Rutter et al. (2007) followed up the same children at age 11, finding that many showed normal levels of functioning, but about 50% of those showing disinhibited attachments and poor peer relationships at age 6 were still doing so and this was more pronounced among those adopted after 6 months.

21
Q

How do these findings relate to Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation?

A

Rutter’s research concludes that early maternal deprivation and a failure to form an attachment within the critical period can lead to long lasting effects on development in later life (long-term effects), such as disinhibited attachments.
However, the negative effects of institutionalisation can be overcome by sensitive, nurturing care, which does challenge Bowlby’s ideas about the effects of maternal deprivation being irreversible.

22
Q

Real-Life Application

A

Studying the Romanian orphans has enhanced our understanding of the effects of institutionalisation, which has led to improvements in the way children are cared for in institutions.

23
Q

examples of real-life applications

A

For example…
Children’s homes now avoid having large numbers of caregivers for each child.
Children tend to have one or two ‘key workers’ who play a central role in their emotional care.
Institutional care is now seen as an undesirable option for looked-after children – instead, every effort is made to accommodate children in foster care or to have them adopted instead.