Romanian Orphan Studies Flashcards

1
Q

What is the background to the Romanian orphan studies

A
  • in 1966, communist government tried to boost population - encouraged mothers to have at least 5 children and banned abortion
  • poverty in country meant lots of families could not afford this
  • when government was overthrown in 1989, 100,000 children were in 600 state run orphanages
  • orphanages were minimally staffed and overpopulated - children received very little cognitive stimulation or emotional care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who ran the Romanian orphan study

A

Rutter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the aim of Rutter’s study?

A

To investigate the long-term effects of institutional care and see the extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure of Rutter’s study?

A
  • longitudinal study started in early 1990’s following group of Romanian orphans adopted to the UK
  • random sample of 165 children from Romania (144 had been in institutions) who had been adopted before age of 4. Were studied at 4,6 and 11
  • compared with 52 non-institutionalised Uk children adopted before 6
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the results of Rutter’s study?

A
  • at time of adoptions over half showed evidence of severe malnourishment
  • IQ got lower the longer they were in orphanages
  • 70.4% of those adopted after 6 months showed signs of disinhibited attachment compared to only 47.7% of those before 6 months
  • 45% who showed disinhibited attachment at 6 showed it at 11 too
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is disinhibited attachment?

A
  • Where children don’t discriminate who they choose as an attachment figure
  • long periods of institutional care in early life can lead children to behave in an attention seeking, overly familiar way with complete strangers and appear to select attachment figures indiscriminately
  • in Rutter’s study, some kids randomly sat on the researchers knee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the conclusion of Rutter’s study?

A

Institutionalisation can have relatively long-term negative effects on social, emotional and cognitive development, but these effects can be minimised if children are taken out of the institutional environment before 6 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is developmental retardation?

A
  • Children raised in institutions often showed delayed development and have a lower IQ on average compared to their peers.
  • For example, in Rutter’s study, kids who had spent over 2 years in an orphanage had an average IQ of 77
  • this seems to be a long lasting effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is deprivation dwarfism?

A
  • Children in institutional care are often physically smaller and research has shown that a lack of emotional care, rather than poor nourishment can lead to physical underdevelopment
  • in Rutter’s study over half of the institutionalised children were in the bottom third for weight and head circumference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Summarise evaluations for the Romanian orphan studies

A
  • useful practical applications - enhanced understanding of negative effects of being raised in institutions
  • promising evidence that recovery is possible - especially if they are adopted before 6 months
  • hard to generalise - conditions in Romania were especially poor
  • some long term effects may not be clear until adulthood - continuity hypothesis/internal working model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly