Role and function of the education system Flashcards
-Durkheim’s perspective on education
-education reinforces social solidarity and teaches us specialists skills
-how does the education system create social solidarity?
-transmitting societies culture from one generation to another
-examples of how social solidarity is promoted in schools:
-history: gives us a shared sense of identity and heritage
- group work/assemblies/school plays etc
-the British values promoted in school
-in american schools, children pledge allegiance to the flag.
-how does education promote specialists skills?
-Durkheim noted that modern industrial economies require a massive and specialised division of labour
-people have specialised jobs which require specific skills and knowledge.
-Schools are in place to teach people the skills they will need to fulfil these different roles for the good of the economy.
-Parsons perspective on education:
education acts as a bridge between family and wider society
-prepares children for universalistic standards rather than particularistic standards taught in family
-believed that school gives us achieved status through efforts and achievements not through fixed characteristics like gender or class ( ascribed status)
-Davis and Moore : role allocation
-Schools performs the function of selecting and sifting students into their future role through:
-sorting and siting pupils based on ability
-most able pupils end up in higher positions in society
-lower ability end up in low skilled positions
-promotes ideas of social mobility and meritocracy
-what do Davis and Moore say about inequality?
-They argue that inequality is necessary to ensure that the most important roles in society are filled by the most talented people.
-not everyone is equally talented so society has to offer higher rewards for these jobs.
-This will encourage everyone to compete for them and society can then select the most talented for these positions.
-AO3 OF FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
-There is ample evidence that equal opportunity in education does not exist. E.g. achievement is greatly influenced by class background rather than ability;
-Marxists argue that education in capitalist society only transmits the ideology of a minority (the ruling class);
-Wrong (1961) says that functionalists have an ‘over socialised view’ of people as mere puppets of society, they imply that pupils accept everything they’re taught and never reject the school’s values;
-Neo-liberals and New Right argue that the state education system fails to prepare young people adequately for work.
-NEOLIBERALISM perspective on education
- promote marketisation: schools become more like businesses, empowering parents and pupils as consumers and using competition between schools to drive up standards.
-They argue that the state should not provide services such as education, health and welfare.
-THE NEW RIGHT (NR) perspective on education:
-to ‘Marketise’ Education – run a school like a business and compete with other schools to attract ‘Customers’ /
pupils.
-means schools will have to listen to the needs of pupils, parents and staff. If schools compete with each other, then standards will increase which will result in a more qualified workforce and a more prosperous economy.
-What are the similarities between
functionalism and the new right?
Both believe that some people are
naturally more talented than others
Both favour an education system run on
meritocratic principles of open competition and one that serves the needs of the economy by preparing young people for work
Both believe that education should socialise pupils into shared values, such as competition, and instil a sense of national identity
-What should the role of the state be according to New Right?
governments should perform the following
roles:
It should impose a strict, standardised framework for schools to compete
within e.g. OFSTED Inspections, League Tables etc
It should make sure that all schools transmit a shared, united culture i.e. through a standardised National Curriculum.
-Chubb and Moe: Consumer Choice
-argue that America’s state schools have failed in their goals + should be placed in the free market
-how have school failed according to Chubb + Moe?
1) failed disadvantaged groups
2) pupils are not equipped with the skills needed to work.
3) private schools are more efficient and productive because they answer to their clients
-Methodology of Chubb and Moe:
They compared the achievements of 60,000 pupils from low income families in 1,015 state schools and private schools as well as a parents survey