Robbery, Burglary and Blackmail Flashcards
AR- Robbery- s.8 TA 1968?
steal + threat of force or application of force
Since one right is sufficient for appropriation, which case shows what can be sufficient for Robbery?
Corcoran v Anderton [1980]- tugging at V’s back and causing V to drop it on the ground
The element of AR- force- case law
Dawson v James [1977]
Snatching a cigarette is not enough for the requirement of force
P v DPP [2013]
Intention to steal is the reason for the force
Codsi [2009]
Force is to be used before or at the time of stealing
Hale [1979]
Indirect application of force will also suffice
R v Martins [2021]- force to person
Where is the offence of Burglary found?
s.9 TA 1968
Describe s.9 (1) (a) of the offence
enter a building or part of a building as a trespasser with the intention to steal or inflict GBH or cause criminal damage
s.9 1 a - ‘enters’- case law
Collins [1973]; Brown [1985]- ‘substantial and effective entry’
for a part a- whether you steal is irrelevant
Ryan [1996]
s.9 (1) (a)- ‘building or part of a building’
Leathley [1979]- large freezer; Walkington [1979]- behind shop counter
s.9(1)(a)- ‘trespasser’
Jones and Smith 1976- father’s house; no permission to take TV sets
What is s.9 1 b of the burglary offence?
s.9 1 a + commission or attempted commission of an offense (theft or GBH)
what does s.9 (3) provide?
if premises are a dwelling- 14yrs imprisonment- Hudson v CPS [2017]- even if it is unocuppied