Robbery, Burglary and Blackmail Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

AR- Robbery- s.8 TA 1968?

A

steal + threat of force or application of force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Since one right is sufficient for appropriation, which case shows what can be sufficient for Robbery?

A

Corcoran v Anderton [1980]- tugging at V’s back and causing V to drop it on the ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The element of AR- force- case law

A

Dawson v James [1977]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Snatching a cigarette is not enough for the requirement of force

A

P v DPP [2013]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intention to steal is the reason for the force

A

Codsi [2009]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Force is to be used before or at the time of stealing

A

Hale [1979]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Indirect application of force will also suffice

A

R v Martins [2021]- force to person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where is the offence of Burglary found?

A

s.9 TA 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe s.9 (1) (a) of the offence

A

enter a building or part of a building as a trespasser with the intention to steal or inflict GBH or cause criminal damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

s.9 1 a - ‘enters’- case law

A

Collins [1973]; Brown [1985]- ‘substantial and effective entry’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

for a part a- whether you steal is irrelevant

A

Ryan [1996]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

s.9 (1) (a)- ‘building or part of a building’

A

Leathley [1979]- large freezer; Walkington [1979]- behind shop counter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

s.9(1)(a)- ‘trespasser’

A

Jones and Smith 1976- father’s house; no permission to take TV sets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is s.9 1 b of the burglary offence?

A

s.9 1 a + commission or attempted commission of an offense (theft or GBH)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does s.9 (3) provide?

A

if premises are a dwelling- 14yrs imprisonment- Hudson v CPS [2017]- even if it is unocuppied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hotel room is generally not a dwelling for the purposes of s.9 offence- case law

A

Chipunza 2021

14
Q

What is key about AR of s.9 1 b? clue: the offence

A

remember, to satisfy s.9 1 b, the AR of the offence needs to satisfied- i.e.- theft- appropriation

15
Q

what is the offence under s.10 (1)?

A

aggravated burglary- possession of firearm or imitation firearm

16
Q

intention to use the firearm is irrelevant

A

Stones [1989]

17
Q

Where is the offence of blackmail found?

A

s.21 TA 1968

18
Q

What is the AR of Blackmail?

A

unwarranted demand made with menaces acting with a view to gain for himself or a third party

18
Q

threats can be other to violence and also would amount to menaces

A

Thorne v Motor Trade Association [1937]

19
Q

demand for the offence of blackmail may be express or implied

A

Collister and Warhurst [1955]

20
Q

Demand need not be made to the victim

A

Treacy v DPP [1971]

21
Q

demands made by instantaneous means of communication

A

R v Pogmore [2017]- made when sent not when received

21
Q

menaces- s.21- blackmail- ordinary meaning

A

Lawrence v Pomroy [1973]

22
Q

threats of such a nature and extent that the mind of an ordinary person might be at influence to meet the demand

A

R v Clear [1968]

23
Q

Menaces more than trivial yet susceptibility to threats does count

A

R v Harry[1974]; R v Garwood [1987]

24
Q

MR of blackmail + case law

A

intent to cause loss to another- R v Harvey, Ulyett and Plummer [1981]

25
Q

What are the 2 statutory defences to a blackmail charge?

A

s.34 1 a and b- D beliefs there are reasonable grounds for the demand
D believes those are the proper means of eforcing the demand

26
Q

MR- intent to gain- what can be gained?-case law

A

Bevans [1988]- injection of morphine; Parkes [1973]- debt owed to D