Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

List OAPA offences from least to most serious

A

-Assault
-Battery
-Assault occasioning ABH- s.47
-Malicious wounding or inflicting GBH- s.20
-Wounding with intent to cause GBH or causing GBH
with intent- s.18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does common assault mean?

A

incl. technical assault and battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is actual harm necessary for s.39 CJA 1988? + relevant case law

A

s.39- assault; no actual harm necessary- R v Lewis 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do the cases of R v Ireland; R v Burstow 1997 tell us about assault?

A

Assault can be committed by words or letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does silence amount to assault? + relevant case law

A

Constanza 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the MR of assault? + case law

A

R v Venna 1975- intention or recklessness as to causing V to apprehend imminent unlawful violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the AR of assault?

A

causing V to apprehend imminent and unlawful personal violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contrast the cases of Tuberville v Savage 1669 and Read v Coker 1853 in relation to assault

A

T v S 1669- you need intention + act
R v C 1853- conditional threats may amount to assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The offence of battery- AR? + case law

A

Actual infliction of force on another person- Collins v Wilcock 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MR of battery + case law

A

intentionally or recklessly inflicting or applying unlawful violence or force upon another person- Fagan v MPC 1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

force may not be done by D directly

A

DPP v K 1990; Haystead 2000; Parmenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the least touching of another may amount to battery

A

Cole v Turner 1705- injury is not necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

s.47 OAPA 1861

A

Technical Assault or Battery that has caused Actual Bodily Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is AR for Assault occasioning ABH?

A

commit assault or battery causing V to suffer Actual Bodily Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the MR for s.47 offence? NOTE: no need to show D intended or foresaw ABH

A

the same as MR for assault/battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is s.20 OAPA 1861?

A

Maliciously Wounding or Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH)

17
Q

What is the AR of s.20 offence?

A

unlawfully wounding or inflicting GBH

18
Q

What is the MR of s.20 offence? + case law

A

intention or recklessness to causing some harm (although not GBH)- Mowatt 1968 Savage and Parmenter 1991

19
Q

What is the test for recklessness?

A

R v Cunningham; R v G and Another

20
Q

What is meant by GBH? use relevant case law

A

DPP v Smith 1961- really serious harm
Saunders 1985- serious harm

21
Q

Describe s.18 offence

A

Wounding or causing GBH with intent

22
Q

What is the AR of s.18? NOTE: causing and inflicting means the same

A

unlawfully wounding or causing GBH

23
Q

What is the MR of s.18? (contrast with s.20)

A

intention to cause GBH (for s.20 it is some harm, here is GBH)

24
Q

What is consent a defence to?- general rule + case law

A

assault or battery offences- Donovan 1934

25
Q

What are the exceptions to the general rule for consent? (regarding s.47/s.20 offence)

A

AG’s Reference No.6 1981- games and sports/ rough horseplay/ surgery/ tattooing/ dangerous exhibitions

26
Q

The defence of consent regarding transmission of STIs

A

R v Konzani- uninformed consent is not consent!