Robbery Flashcards
R v Skivington (Claim of right)
“Larceny [or theft] is an element of robbery, and if the honest belief that a man has a claim of right is a defence to larceny, then it negatives one of the elements in the offence of robbery, without proof of which the full offence is not made out.”
R v Lapier (Taking)
Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by the thief is only momentary.
R v Cox (Possession)
Possession involves two elements.
The first, often called the physical element,
is actual or potential physical custody or control.
The second, often described as the mental element …
is a combination of knowledge and intention:
knowledge in the sense of an awareness by the accused
that the substance is in his possession …
and an intention to exercise possession.
R v Maihi (connection between theft and violence)
“It is implicit in ‘accompany’ that there must be a nexus (connection or link) between the act of stealing … and a threat of violence. Both must be present.” However the term “does not require that the act of stealing and the threat of violence be contemporaneous …”
Peneha v Police (force used in violence sufficient)
It is sufficient that
“the actions of the defendant
forcibly interfere with
personal freedom
or
(the actions of the defendant)
amount to forcible,
powerful or violent motion,
tending to cause
bodily injury or discomfort”.
R v Broughton (threat of violence)
A threat of violence is “the manifestation of an intention to inflict violence unless the money or property be handed over. The threat may be direct or veiled. It may be conveyed by words or conduct, or a combination of both.”
R v Joyce (together with)
“The Crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.”
R v Galey (being together intention)
“Being together” in the context of section 235(b) involves
“two or more persons having the common intention
to use their combined force,
either in any event or as circumstances might require,
directly in the perpetration of the crime.”
- two or more persons
- common intention
- combined force,
- any event or as circumstances
- perpetration of the crime.”
Robbery
Section 234, Crimes Act 1961
Theft
Accompanied by violence or Threats of violence
To any person or Property
Used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to it’s being stolen.
Theft
Section 219, (1)(a)(b)Crimes Act 1961
a. Dishonestly and without claim of right, takes any property with intent to deprive any owner permanently of that property OR of any interest in that property
b. Dishonestly and without claim of right, using or dealing with any property with intent to deprive any owner permanently of that property or of any interest in that property after obtaining possession of, or control over the property in whatever manner.
Dishonestly
Without permission or Authority
Claim of Right
A belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other the the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
Define “control”
To exercise authoritative or dominating influence over something.
A person can control an item that is not in their physical custody, and conversely can have something in their physical custody that they have no control over.
Define “property”
Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, (money, electricity) and any debt, and anything in action, and any other right of interest.
Intent to deprive owner permanently
An intent to deal with property in such a manner that:
a. the property cannot be returned to any owner in the same condition, or
b. Any owner is likely to be permanently deprived of the property or of any interest in the property.