Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

Robbery

Section, Elements and Penalty

A

Section 234 (1) Crimes Act

  • Theft
  • Accompanied by violence or threats of violence
  • To any person or property
  • Used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen

10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Theft definition and caselaw:

A

Dishonestly and WCOR, taking/using or dealing with any property with intent to deprive any owner permanently of that property or interest

R v Lapier
R v Peat
R v Cox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dishonestly definition

A

An act or omission done without belief that there was express or implied consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mistaken belief in regards to theft

A
  • The act or omission was,
    expressly or impliedly,
    consented to by a person
    entitled to give consent
  • That the act or omission was
    authorised by a person
    entitled to authorise it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Claim of right definition

A

At the time of the act, a proprietary right to the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Skivington circumstances

A

The defendant went to the office where he and his wife worked and forced them at knife point to give his pay cheque early

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Skivington

A

Theft is an element for Robbery, and if the honest belief that a man has a claim of right is a defence to theft then he has a defence to Robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Lapier circumstances

A

Snatched an earring from lady’s ear but it got tangled in her hair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Lapier

A

Robbery is complete the moment the property is taken, even if possession is only momentary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Peat

A

The immediate return of the property will not purge the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain ‘using or dealing with’ in terms of Robbery

A

‘Using or dealing with’ property requires that the defendant acted contrary to any authority or consent given by the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Cox

A

Possession involves 2 elements.

1) the physical elements, actual or potential physical custody.

2) the mental element, a combination of knowledge and intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give an example of potential custody

A

Storing the thing in question at an associates house or through an agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition of property

A

Include real and personal property and any estate or interest in any property or debt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain ‘ownership’ for the purposes of theft

A

(a) possession or control of the property

(b) any interest in the property

(c) the right to take possession or control of the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Maihi circumstances

A

The defendant kept saying he liked the leather jacket and the complainant handed it over.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

R v Maihi

A

There must be a nexus between the act of stealing and the threat of violence. Both must be present but need not be contemporaneous

18
Q

R v Mitchell

What is this assessed by?

A

Property may be handed over because of threats previously made, acting on the victims mind at the time.

Assessed by fact and degree in each case

19
Q

In the context of Robbery what must the violence involve?

A

More than a minimal degree of force and more than a technical assault but need not involve the infliction of bodily injury

20
Q

Peneha v Police

A

It is sufficient that the actions of the defendant forcibly interfere with personal freedom

21
Q

R v Broughton

A

Threat may be direct or veiled, conveyed by conduct or words or both. Absence of fear by the victim does not negate the threat

2 street kids asking for money, amounted to threat

22
Q

Examples of conduct or considerations which may amount to a threat of violence

A
  • the relative ages
  • their respective physiques
  • their appearance
  • their demeanour
  • what was said and done by
    those involved
  • the manner and setting that
    the incident took place
23
Q

Extort meaning:

A

To obtain by violence, coercion or intimidation

24
Q

Prevent meaning:

A

To keep from happening.

Anticipates resistance and uses violence to prevent it

25
Overcome meaning:
To defeat. prevail or get the better of. Resistance occurs and violence is used to overpower.
26
Aggravated Robbery (a) Section and Elements
Section 235(a) CA 1961 - Robs - Any person - At the time of or immediately before or immediately after, the robbery - Causes GBH - To any person 14 years
27
Aggravated Robbery (b) Section and Elements
Section 235(b) CA 1961 - Being together with any other person(s) - Robs - Any person
28
Aggravated Robbery (c) Section and Elements
Section 235(c) CA 1961 - Being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument or any thing appearing to be such a weapon or instrument - Robs - Any other person 14 years
29
DPP v Smith
"Bodily Harm" needs no explanation and "grievous" means no more and no less than "really serious".
30
R v Joyce
The crown must establish that at least 2 persons were physically present at the time the Robbery was committed or the assault occurred.
31
R v Galey
"Being together" in the context of 235(b) involves "two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force in the perpetration of the crime"
32
Being armed with meaning:
Carrying or has it available for immediate use as a weapon
33
Three broad classes of offensive weapon:
- Items that are made solely for the purpose of attacking or inflicting injury, such as firearms, swords or knuckledusters. - Items that may otherwise have an innocent purpose but have been altered or adapted for use for causing injury, such as a bottle that has been deliberately broken to create a jagged edge. - Items that are intended to cause injury, which includes anything capable of causing injury that is carried by the defendant for that purpose, such as a baseball bat or a knife
34
R v Bentham
A persons body is not a weapon (ie a hand under the shirt)
35
Assault with intent to rob (1)(a)
Section 236(1)(a) - With intent to rob any person - Causes GBH - To that person or any other person
36
Assault with intent to rob (1)(b)
Section 236(1)(b) - With intent to rob any person - Being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument or anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument - Assaults that person or any other person 14 years
37
Assault with intent to rob (1)(c)
Section 236(1)(c) - With intent to rob any person - Being together with any other person or persons - Assaults that person or any other person
38
Assault with intent to rob (2) Section, Elements and Penalty
Section 236(2) - Assaults - Any person - With intent to rob that person or any other person 7 years
39
Assault meaning:
The act of intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to the person or another, directly or indirectly or threatening by any act or gesture to apply force
40
Steps at scene for dealing with a Robbery
- Secure safety - Prevent crime - Contain area - Gather and preserve evidence - Establish and eliminate suspects - Identify offender - Locate offender - Search offender and their premise. Preserve evidence - Establish if case exists for prosecution - Prepare files for prosecution
41
R v Pacholko
It is the conduct of the accused which has to be assessed rather than the 'strength of nerves of the person threatened'
42
Offensive weapon definition:
Any article made or altered for use of causing bodily injury or intended by the person having it for such a use.