Robbery Flashcards
Robbery
Section, Elements and Penalty
Section 234 (1) Crimes Act
- Theft
- Accompanied by violence or threats of violence
- To any person or property
- Used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen
10 years
Theft definition and caselaw:
Dishonestly and WCOR, taking/using or dealing with any property with intent to deprive any owner permanently of that property or interest
R v Lapier
R v Peat
R v Cox
Dishonestly definition
An act or omission done without belief that there was express or implied consent
Mistaken belief in regards to theft
- The act or omission was,
expressly or impliedly,
consented to by a person
entitled to give consent - That the act or omission was
authorised by a person
entitled to authorise it
Claim of right definition
At the time of the act, a proprietary right to the property
R v Skivington circumstances
The defendant went to the office where he and his wife worked and forced them at knife point to give his pay cheque early
R v Skivington
Theft is an element for Robbery, and if the honest belief that a man has a claim of right is a defence to theft then he has a defence to Robbery
R v Lapier circumstances
Snatched an earring from lady’s ear but it got tangled in her hair
R v Lapier
Robbery is complete the moment the property is taken, even if possession is only momentary
R v Peat
The immediate return of the property will not purge the offence
Explain ‘using or dealing with’ in terms of Robbery
‘Using or dealing with’ property requires that the defendant acted contrary to any authority or consent given by the owner
R v Cox
Possession involves 2 elements.
1) the physical elements, actual or potential physical custody.
2) the mental element, a combination of knowledge and intention
Give an example of potential custody
Storing the thing in question at an associates house or through an agent
Definition of property
Include real and personal property and any estate or interest in any property or debt
Explain ‘ownership’ for the purposes of theft
(a) possession or control of the property
(b) any interest in the property
(c) the right to take possession or control of the property
R v Maihi circumstances
The defendant kept saying he liked the leather jacket and the complainant handed it over.
R v Maihi
There must be a nexus between the act of stealing and the threat of violence. Both must be present but need not be contemporaneous
R v Mitchell
What is this assessed by?
Property may be handed over because of threats previously made, acting on the victims mind at the time.
Assessed by fact and degree in each case
In the context of Robbery what must the violence involve?
More than a minimal degree of force and more than a technical assault but need not involve the infliction of bodily injury
Peneha v Police
It is sufficient that the actions of the defendant forcibly interfere with personal freedom
R v Broughton
Threat may be direct or veiled, conveyed by conduct or words or both. Absence of fear by the victim does not negate the threat
2 street kids asking for money, amounted to threat
Examples of conduct or considerations which may amount to a threat of violence
- the relative ages
- their respective physiques
- their appearance
- their demeanour
- what was said and done by
those involved - the manner and setting that
the incident took place
Extort meaning:
To obtain by violence, coercion or intimidation
Prevent meaning:
To keep from happening.
Anticipates resistance and uses violence to prevent it