Injures and Aggravated Flashcards

1
Q

Injuring with intent (1)

A

Section 189 (1)

  • With intent to cause GBH
  • To any person
  • Injures
  • Any person

10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Injuring with intent (2)

A

Section 189 (2)

  • With intent to injure any
    person or
  • With reckless disregard for the
    safety of others
  • Injures
  • Any person

5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Donovan circumstances

A

A man was charged with caning a 17 year old girl for the purposes of his own sexual gratification. The doctor found marks consistent with a ‘fairly severe beating’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Donovan / R v Mcarthur

A

‘Bodily harm’ includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent but must be more than transitory or trifling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Chan-Fook

A

“the body of the victim includes all parts of his body, including his organs, nervous system and brain. The phrase actual bodily harm is capable of including psychiatric injury”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Acting recklessly involves what?

A

The conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cameron v R

A

Recklessness

Recklessness is establish if:

(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:

(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or

(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and

(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must be proved when recklessness is an element in an offence??

A

1) A subjective test

That the defendant was aware of the risk

2) A objective test

Unreasonable for them to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social utility examples

A

Social effect.

No social utility: game of Russian roulette (personal)

High social utility: surgeon undertaking a risky but life saving surgery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Tipple

A

Recklessness

Recklessness requires that the offender know of, or have a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk, and it may be said that it requires “a deliberate decision to run the risk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aggravated Wounding

Section and Elements

A

Section 191 (1)

  • With intent

(a) to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence; or

(b) to avoid the detection of himself or of any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence; or

(c) to avoid the arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of any imprisonable offence

-wounds, maims, disfigures, causes GBH to any person, stupefies, renders unconscious any person, by any violent means renders any person incapable of resistance

  • any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Tihi

A

Aggravated Wounding

Two-fold test

1) The defendant intended to facilitate the commission of an imprisonable offence (or one of the intents outlined in a, b or c.

2) They intended to cause the specified harm, or was reckless as to that risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Tihi circumstances

A

One of the defendants held a knife to a taxi drivers neck in order to steal his taxi, inflicting a small cut in the process. He admitted his intent to steal the taxi, but argued that the injury to the driver was unintentional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

To facilitate meaning:

A

To make possible or to make easy or easier.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Wati circumstances

A

The defendant was present during a riot where officers were attacked. Wati fled but was caught by a Constable who he kicked and punched in an attempt to avoid arrest. He was charged with “riot” and “agg assault” but was acquitted on the riot charge therefore could not be liable for the aggravating feature of the assault.

Charged with common assault instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Wati

A

Aggravated Wounding

There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault or by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate

17
Q

R v Sturm circumstances

A

The defendant was convicted for administering alcohol, ecstasy and other drugs to a number of male victims in order to dull their senses and sexually violate them.

18
Q

Stupefy meaning:

R v Sturm

A

Means to ‘cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person, which really seriously interferes with that person’s mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime’.

19
Q

Render meaning:

A

Cause to be or cause to become

20
Q

Violent means in regards to aggravated wounding

A

Not limited to physical violence and may include threats of violence, depending on circumstances

21
Q

Rendering a person incapable of resistance by violent means:

A

The threat of violence or the use of physical violence used to render the person incapable if resistance

22
Q

R v Claridge circumstances

Claridge is in prison

A

Violent means

The defendant attempted to hit a prison officer on the head with an iron bar while trying to escape. Officer fell off wall and broke his ankle.

Claridge argued unsuccessfully that he was not liable for injuries.

‘Violent means’ is not limited to physical violence, may include threats of violence.

23
Q

R v Crossan

A

Incapable of resistance

Includes a powerless of will as well as physical incapacity

24
Q

R v Crossan circumstances

A

The defendant, intending to rape the victim, presented a loaded revolver at her and threatened to shoot her unless she submitted to sexual intercourse.

25
Q

Aggravated Assault (1)

Section and Elements

A

Section 192 (1)

  • Assaults
  • Any person
  • With intent

(a) to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence or

(b) to avoid the detection of himself or any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence or

(c) to avoid the arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of any imprisonable offence

3 years

26
Q

Assault elements to prove for a conviction of Aggravated Assaults

A
  • Intention to apply or attempt
    to apply force to another
  • Application or attempted
    application of force, either
    directly or indirectly
  • Threaten to apply force in
    circumstances where the
    victim believes the offender
    will be able to carry out the
    threat
27
Q

Section 192(2)

A

Aggravated Assault

  • Assaults
  • Any constable
  • With intent to obstruct the
    person assaulted
28
Q

Section 191 (2)

A

Aggravated injury

  • With an such intent as
    aforesaid
  • Injures
  • Any person

7 years