RL: LOGICAL POSITIVISM Flashcards

1
Q

What were the Vienna Circle interested in?

A

The questions Wittgenstein raised and developing their own approaches to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who was the Vienna Circle led by?

A

Schlick.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Vienna Circle members generally believe about theological interpretations?

A

Belonged in the past, to an unenlightened age when ‘God’ was used as an explanation that anything that science had not yet completely mastered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the Vienna Circle aim to develop?

A

More scientific ways of understanding questions raised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Conte claim?

A

That people’s thinking had passed through various stages over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the ‘theological era’ according to Conte?

A

When people attributed all things they did not understand to God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the ‘theological era’ replaced by according to Conte?

A

The ‘metaphysical’ era.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Conte’s final age?

A

The ‘positivist’ age, when the only useful form of evidence for investigation was that which was available to the senses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the Vienna Circle conclude about empirical evidence?

A

The key to understanding what was meaningful and what was not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is logical positivism?

A

The idea that a claim was meaningful if it could be tested using sense experience, and meaningless if not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two categories that meaningful statements fall into?

A
  1. Analytic Statements.

2. Synthetic Statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are analytic statements?

A

True by definition.

These statements are true or false depending on whether the words in the statement mean what is suggested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are synthetic statements?

A

Information that goes beyond just defining our use of language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do synthetic statements qualify as meaningful?

A

They have to be verifiable using empirical evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the verifiable theory?

A

If a statement is neither analytic nor empirically verifiable, it says nothing about reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is judging the meaningfulness of language known as?

A

The ‘verification principle’.

17
Q

What did Comte conclude?

A

That empirical evidence was the key to understanding what was meaningful and what was not.

18
Q

What did Hume argue?

A

That if a statement does not contain any abstract reasoning or any experimental reasoning, then it says nothing at all.

19
Q

What did Ward reason about logical positivism?

A

That God’s existence can in principle be verified since God himself can verify his own existence.