Rights Flashcards

1
Q

In the UK, what are rights often referred to as?

A

Civil liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Human/ “natural” rights 3 points:

A

Absolute -> must be held up in all circumstances
Universal -> apply to people everywhere whatever state they are in
Fundamental -> they cannot be removed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give an example of a Human/ “natural” right

A

The right to life
Freedom from torture
Freedom from slavery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are civil liberties?

A

Fundamental rights and freedoms that ought to be protected from interference or encroachment by the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give an example of a civil liberty.

A

Freedom of expression
Right to Privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Civil liberties 2 points:

A

Dependent upon citizenship -> they can differ from state to state
Contextual -> depends on the country/ state you live in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

British citizens are given key responsibilities which are expected to be performed or abided by. What are these called?

A

Civic responsibilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give an example of a civic responsibility.

A

Respect and obey the law
Pay taxes
Vote
Serve on a jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Liberal thinker JS Mill believe?

A

He considered civic responsibilities to be an integral part of civil rights and liberties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why has there been a concern that civic responsibilities are overlooked?

A

Many civic responsibilities aren’t written down,
so a British Bill of Rights would help to enshrine and make clear the civic responsibilities of a citizen, as well as their rights,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are positive rights?

A

Positive rights are formally enshrined in constitutional documents (eg. bill of rights or declaration of the rights of man)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are negative rights/ views?

A

Negative rights are reluctant to have positive legal confirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the traditional UK view and then the traditional US and French view of positive vs negative rights?

A

UK: A negative view
US and French: A positive assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

There has been a gradual incorporation of WHAT rights into Uk Law?

A

Positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The European Convention of Human Rights (1950)
Made by the Council of Europe. Favoured by C________. (NOT to be confused with the EU - is s________).
Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
Article 6 - Right to a fair t_____
Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
Article 10 - Freedom of expression

A

Churchill
separate
trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Human Rights Act (1998) -> The ____ was taken directly written into UK law in 1998, making it accessible in UK courts.

A

ECHR (European Convention of Human Rights (1950))

17
Q

What was good about the HRA (Human Rights Act) being passed in 1998?

A

For the first time, it clearly set out the positive rights a citizen holds.
Until then, rights had been characterised in a negative way, meaning a person had the right to do anything as long as it wasn’t expressly forbidden by the law.
The HRA gave rights a degree of codification, giving citizens greater legal protection and securing more democratic freedoms for the people.

18
Q

What was bad about the HRA (Human Rights Act) being passed in 1998?

A

The Act was not entrenched, meaning it can be replaced. The Conservatives pledged to do this with a British Bill of Rights.
The Act cannot overturn primary legislation in parliament.
The Act can be ‘set aside’ by the government, as happened with the derogation of the rights of terror suspects after 9/11.

19
Q

Human Rights Act 1998 case study)
The Court of Appeal held that Shamima Begum, who had left the UK aged 15 to join the I______ S____, should be allowed to return to the UK to participate in the legal case concerning the removal of her c___________.
At the time of writing, the Supreme a court is reviewing the case.

A

Islamic State
citizenship

20
Q

The USA Bill of Rights is e_________, so it can only be changed by super majority of 2/3 Congress and 3/4 state legislations.
The UK Human Rights Act is not e_________, so it can be changed via a simple majority.

A

USA Bill of Rights = entrenched
UK HRA = not entrenched

21
Q

In the USA Bill of Rights, the Supreme Court can “strike down” l__________.
In the UK Human Rights Act, the S______ C_____ can issue a “Declaration to incompatibility” (a declaration by a court that a piece of UK legislation is incompatible with the provisions of the ECHR. It cannot “strike down” legislation, BUT it has moral weight).

A

legislation
Supreme Court

22
Q

How does a case of breach of the Human Rights Act work?

A

Case of Breach of the HRA -> Judicial Review -> Approved? -> Declaration of incompatibility -> govt may amend law

23
Q

Why have their been more conflicts over rights since 1997?

A
  • The introduction of the HRA has given judges more power to challenge govt ministers
  • The introduction of the HRA has made it easier for ordinary people to use the judicial system to challenge govt ministers
  • The increased threat of terrorism has a caused governments to take actions on the basis of national security, which conflict with individual rights
  • There is perception that ministers are attempting to expand their powers at the expense of Civil rights and liberties
  • In 2019, the Covid-19 pandemic saw the govt enact sweeping restrictions in the name of public safety but some groups, including some Conservative MPs, considered these restrictions as attacks on civil liberties and the actions of an over-powerful government,
24
Q

Give an argument FOR the HRA

A

Speed of Access-> it can be accessed in British courts - no more up to 7 years time frame.
Notable cases of protection for the vulnerable or marginalised (eg. cannot keep DNA of those found not guilty)

25
Q

Give an argument AGAINST the HRA:

A

Human Rights Inflation -> Abstract interpretation allows rights like the right to family life are placed equal to freedom from torture. Rights of individuals are placed above the greater good of community.
It is too open to abuse by those who abuse the law. Note the right to private and family life and freedom from torture has prevented deportation of non-UK criminals and hate preachers.

26
Q

What are individual rights?

A

Individual rights are there in which the right-holder is an individual, regardless of any personal characteristics.

27
Q

Give an example of individual rights:

A

Human Rights, as they apply to everyone irrespective of race, religion, or sex.

28
Q

What are collective rights?

A

Collective (or group) rights are those in which the ‘owner’ of a right could be seen as a group.

29
Q

Give two different examples of collective rights:

A

The group may share a characteristic (eg. gay rights), or may be organisational (eg. workers’ rights), as these individuals share a characteristic or belief.

30
Q

What is constitutional democracy?

A

Protecting the Individual avoiding “Tyranny of the Majority”

31
Q

What is Majoritarian democracy?

A

The rights of the individual must be balanced by the rights of the group.

32
Q

Give an example of where there has been a clash between individual and collective rights:

A

Boris Johnson aimed to slow down the spread of COVID-19 to sensors the NHS could cope with the number of propel requiring hospitalisation. He took away some individual rights, such as the freedom to move around the country and see family members, in an effort to protect the wider population from infection, illness, and possible death.

33
Q

How have individual rights gained momentum?
How have collective rights gained momentum?

A

Individual rights have gained momentum from the HRA.
Collective rights have gained momentum from digital democracy, as people can communicate.

34
Q

Can the Judiciary or Parliament better defend rights?
Give a pro and then counter then reverse it

A

74% of senior judges were in private school -> MPs represent their constituents and are more representative of the people.

Judges are neutral, so can protect a person’s rights without discrimination, so more effective at upholding individual rights. -> Parliament has the ability to suspend the HRA to achieve its goals and is usually dominated by the governing party, leading to tyranny of the majority and very few effective checks on govt actions that contradict human rights.

35
Q

What would the Bill of Rights change? Give one

A

It would make it harder for people to bring human rights claims by introducing a “permission stage”, requiring to prove they’ve suffered ‘significant disadvantage’. The Government says this is necessary to weed out “trivial cases”.

The Bill would require judges to defer to the government on a wide range of areas. Courts’ powers to interpret laws to make them compatible with Convention rights would be removed.

36
Q

Give 3 of 5 ways UK democracy could be improved:

A

Reform of the Voting system -> better results?
Reform of the Devolved system
Reform of the Monarchy -> should be elected?
Reform of the Lords -> proposals of a fully/ partially elected HOL
Reform of the Commons -> bestow more power to speaker to control debates
Codifying the Constitution -> a written constitutional document which has been consolidated