Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Politics A-Level > RHV UK politics democracy Jan mock > Flashcards

RHV UK politics democracy Jan mock Flashcards

1
Q

direct democracy good examples

A
  • e-petitions- UK plastic bag charge- 5p in 2015
  • initiatives- Proposition 8 was an initiative that reached the required signatures and sought to “Eliminate the rights of same sex couples to marry”. The proposition passed, but was stuck down later by the Supreme Court
  • referendums
    -high referendum turnout 2014 85% Scotland- Brexit 72%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

direct democracy advantages

A

more directly reflect beliefs
better education
more participation
removes partisan nature of government
more legitimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

direct democracy disadvantages

A

tyranny of the majority
lack of accountability
rubber stamp from the people
uninformed electorate
poor participation like 2011 AV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

direct democracy cons examples

A
  • low turnout in 2011 AV 40%
  • initiatives- Proposition 8 reached the required signatures- “Eliminate the rights of same sex couples to marry”. passed, but was stuck down by the supreme court in 2013
  • e-petitions - reforming ADHD medication under 10,000- backbench business committee has to approve
  • used as rubber Stamp- Cameron Brexit ‘I always win’
  • uninfomed electorate Brexit NHS bus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

milestones in suffrage

A

Great reform act 1832- abolished rotten boroughs- 6%
Representation of the People Act (1928)- female vote over 21
Scottish elections act 2016- 16 voting age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

participation stats examples- pros and cons

A
  • 37 with 100,000 signatured 2011-2015
  • Starbucks and Gaza- sales dipped 7% in 2024
  • BLM 15 to 26 million people in the USA
  • 2019 Audit- 50% felt no impact on politics
  • party membership , less than 1 mil in 2019
  • Tommy Robinson on X, misinformation about COVID-19 causing racist attacks on Asian Britons
  • trade unions at an all time low in 2016
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

reforms will advance democracy points and examples

A
  • more referendums- 85% turnout for Scottish independence 2014, 72% Brexit, Rejoin EU 1.1% 2021 MoL election- engagement
  • change FPTP- decrease apathy- 2 reps in AMS like in Scotland- 9/10 scots feel it is v important to vote,
  • lower voting age- young people want to vote 4/5 of 16-to-25-year-olds in England take at least some interest in politics, more legitimacy- 1.6 mil population 16-17
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

reforms will not advance democracy points and examples

A
  • referendums too often cause apathy- unengaging AV 2011 42%, lack of popular control about when and where they are used- EU only called to put it to bed by Cameron
  • changing FPTP- A government can carry out their manifesto- Blair and his reforms, 2024 Labour won 63% of the seats with 34% votes, PR, vote would increase by 3-7%
  • lower voting age- less than half of 18 to 24-year-olds voted in the last election, 70% of people under 18 don’t know the name of their MP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

16 voting pros

A

issues ignored- 7% drop Starbucks Gaza

irrational cut-off age and blurred age of majority- can get married, join army, leave education, have sex
more political engagement

Amika George- #FreePeriods 17
more legitimacy- 1.6 mil population 16-17

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

16 voting cons

A
  • lack of interest- less than half of 18 to 24-year-olds voted in the last election, 70% of people under 18 don’t know the name of their MP
  • preserving childhood- need parental consent for many things like marriage, not fully finished education, no understanding of taxes
  • low turnout
  • need education- VA on priv. is already too big of a change, will only continue to increase low turnout- under 60% 2024
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

compulsory votes pros

A
  • increased participation- low turnout- under 60% 2024, low turnout in 2011 AV 40%
  • greater education- 70% of people under 18 don’t know the name of their MP, 17% of people dont register to vote
  • disengaged people get an opportunity- least likely black Caribbean and black African heritage to vote
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

compulsory votes cons

A
  • wasted votes- 5% 2016 Australia
  • addresses cause not problem
  • abuse of freedom to not vote
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

suffragettes

A

suffragists Millicent Fawcett
suffragettes Pankhurst deeds not words
debate which is more important
full 1928

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

prisoner votes movements

A

HRA 1998- 2004 Hirst case
Prison Reform Trust
2017- can register to vote- not great change
Cameron- ‘physically ill’
break no make laws
only 13 EU countries no vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

interest group

A

pressure group for the member’s interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

peak group

A

association of industries or groups w common interests- pool resources and work together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

cause group

A

pressure group with shared ideals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

think tanks

A

group of experts
provide policy advice, ideas and policy proposals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

think tank pros and examples

A

enrich democracy w crucial expertise
pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves to go ahead with shaking up the government’s fiscal rules- Progressive Britain, Fabian Society

unlock democracy given A- not all opaque

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

think tank cons and examples

A

shady funding
UK think tanks have raised more than £101m to influence public policy 2023 for general election.
“Who Funds You?” E rating- Adam Smith, Civitas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

corporation pros and examples

A

crucial economic role so democratic to be heard
BBA voice of banking
Confederation of British Industry (CBI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

corporation cons and examples

A

not a level playing field
counterbalanced with trade unions
all time low 2016
1/2 workers then, 1/4 workers now
BBA protected guilty bankers 2008

23
Q

lobbyists pros and examples

A

represent groups important to democracy- businesses and wider interests

1923, Churchill worked as a lobbyist for Burmah Oil

industry is worth over £2 bil/year

24
Q

lobbyists cons and examples

A

only the wealthiest can influence key decisions by funding

2 Labour peers suspended 2009 120,000 pounds to amend legislation

Lord Blencathra paid to lobby for Cayman Islands 2012

25
Q

insider pressure group example and points

A
  • influence on ministers is most effective (becoming decentralised)
    UK government spent £140 billion on bailouts- benefit BBA 2008
    vs
    60% decentralised population 2024
  • parliament has become more powerful and sophisticated so more effective (gov still dominates parliament)
    Lords defeated the government 129 times during the 2019-2021 session
    vs
    winners bonus 34% to 64% 2024
  • influence inside a specific party can be effective when in power (but bad for other parties)
    2010 and 2020, Unite donated over £40 million to the Labour Party.
    vs
    Johnson has publicly criticized “militant” unions
26
Q

outsider pressure group example and points

A
  • engaging public opinion forces government (can be unlikely)
    Marcus Rashford vs extinction rebellion
  • direct action good or 24-hour news (mob rule seen as bad)
    Brian Haw- 5 year demonstration outside parliament against Iraq war vs Blair supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq and had the British Armed Forces participate
  • using the courts to challenge government policy (costly and time consuming)
    Friends of the Earth blocking 3rd Heathrow runway vs The Countryside Alliance failed legal case against banning fox hunting
27
Q

Magna carta

A

1215
stops monarch abusing power

28
Q

Bill of Rights

A

1689
more limits on monarchy

29
Q

Human Rights Act

A

1998
ECHR became law
accessible rights protection

30
Q

Equality Act

A

2010
brought all anti-discrimination into a single document
protects workers and public

31
Q

Freedom of Information Act

A

2000
openness and accountability
vexatious
expenses scandal 2008
Liberty stop and search 2010

32
Q

individual rights definition

A

granted to individuals through status as human beings
life, liberty, security

33
Q

collective rights definition

A

granted to groups or communities
importance of group identity

34
Q

collective vs individual rights examples

A

COVID-19 lockdown march 2020, 230,000 deaths

FOI- collective good, vexatious- 2008 expenses scandal

HRA- declaration of incompatibility, Rwanda, suspected terrorists Abu Hamza delayed deportation

Equality act 2010 protected characteristics

35
Q

elections pros

A
  • representation- represent constituencies, surgeries, 8 independents, Unrealistic Housing Targets for Reigate questioned by Rebecca Paul
  • holding to account- Tory -251 seats 2024, Lib Dem -49 seats 2015
  • participation- active role, 70% 2017, 2011 AV ref. v low,
36
Q

elections cons

A
  • representation- not been not lab or cons since 1931, 35% of Tory MPs local
  • holding to account- every 4-5 years, safe seats, Liberal 1906 Reigate, apathy of young people, online politics
  • participation- only 60% 2024, failing support and lack of faith in 2 parties, only 34% labour 2024
37
Q

plurality definition

A

winner is the candidate with the most votes
no majority needed
non-proportional

38
Q

majority system definition

A

winner needs more than 50% to be elected
non-proportional

39
Q

FPTP definition

A

UK
candidate with greatest number of votes is elected
winner has more votes than any other candidate, not a majority

40
Q

FPTP pros

A
  • strong government
    clear electoral mandate- easily held to account, Tory -251 seats 2024, Lib Dem -49 seats 2015, winners bonus, keeps out extremists such as BNP out
  • representative of constituencies, Unrealistic Housing Targets for Reigate questioned by Rebecca Paul, Friday afternoon surgeries
  • easily understood- tried and tested X, Newcastle 59 mins to declare 2017, 5.6 per cent AV Australia spoilt ballots
41
Q

FPTP cons

A
  • not always a strong government- 2010 coalition, Conservative confidence and supply with DUP, mandate unclear due to under 50%- Labour 34% 2024
  • not representative of constituencies- 35% of Tory MPs local, Rebecca Paul assisted dying- cannot represent everyone
  • easy understanding- doesn’t lead to more votes- Scottish AMS 2021 at 20 year high turnout, more proportional with AMS in scotland would lead to higher turnout- was easily understood in all devolved regions
42
Q

AMS definition

A

Additional Member System
used in:
Scottish, Welsh, Greater London assemblies

  • hybrid voting system that has elements of FPTP (for constituencies) and the Closed List
  • 2 votes
  • list results are used to add ‘top-up’ representatives to make the result proportional- calc by D’HONDT method
43
Q

AMS pros

A
  • Having 2 votes makes people feel more empowered- their vote counts regionally
  • Can produce majority governments- MS Scotland 2011- SNP majority- Can still lead to a secure government- FPTP
  • Parties have to appeal to wider electorate to get regional votes, not just focus on swing constituencies
44
Q

AMS cons

A
  • Issues with size of regions- relatively small size of the electoral regions means that parties need to win around 6% of the list vote in a single region to win any seats. Some smaller parties therefore remain unrepresented
  • parties therefore remain unrepresented
    Split voting causes tactical aspects
  • also encompasses negative aspects on FPTP and closed list
45
Q

STV definition

A

multi member constituencies
uses Droop quota
minimize wasted votes
proportional
- NI assembly
- meet quota = win
- excess votes transferred
- The candidate with the least votes is eliminated and votes transferred
This process repeats from step 1 until the required number of candidates have been elected.

46
Q

STV pros

A
  • coalition so fits NI well- ended 30 years of violence
  • proportional- Electoral reform society supports
47
Q

STV cons

A
  • weaken the representative-constituent link because of it’s multi-member constituencies- NI 5 MLAs from each of the 18 constituencies
  • still unstable- suspended 6 times, only period of extended devolved government was 2007-17
48
Q

SV definition

A
  • supplementary vote
  • NOT proportional
  • single candidate
  • metro mayors in England + London
  • majority system- top 2 parties remain if no majority- 2 votes each
49
Q

SV pros

A
  • allows people to vote for 1st choice and in protest- Rejoin EU 1.1% 2021
  • prevents splitting vote- labour 40 to 55% in 2nd round 2021
50
Q

SV cons

A
  • wasted votes if not vote for top 2- creates 2 party system- Labour, Cons, Green, Lib Dem- can vote for last 2 and wasted
  • not proportional- 45% votes wasted 2021
51
Q

referendum pros

A
  • representative democracy
  • more legitimacy
  • sometimes high participation- 72% Brexit
52
Q

referendum cons

A
  • undermine Parliamentary Sovereignty- Brexit Cameron
  • divisions in society- Scottish Indy Rev
  • issues too complex for a public vote- question phrasing Brexit
53
Q

referendum examples

A
  • Scottish Indy Rev
  • Brexit Cameron ‘I always win’
  • 72% Brexit
  • low turnout AV 2011 42.0%

Politics A-Level (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions