Politics MEC UK Government Constitution Flashcards

1
Q

Magna Carta

A

1215
barons on King John
distinguished monarchy and tyranny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Glorious Revolution

A

1688
Monarchs William and Mary agreed to be a constitutional monarchy, accepting parliaments restraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bill of Rights

A

1689
frequent parliaments, establishing the start of parliamentary sovereignty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

UK constitution is a

A

PUUF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PUUF

A

Parliamentary
Uncodified
Unitary
Flexible- Unentrenched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

unitary meaning

A

Power is centralised and given out under one body – Parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Parliamentary advantages

A

Effective government…
* helps make the government stronger
* Due to uncodified nature, statute laws cannot be struck down with government support as it is sovereign
* Meaning, government can be strong and decisive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

parliamentary disadvantages

A

Elective dictatorship…
- Once elected, UK governments can act however they please until re-election due to the sovereignty of parliament, which is controlled by the government of the day
- Due to this concentration of power, the government can re-shape the constitution, creating the impression that the constitution does not exist
Government can easily control parliament with effective whipping and a big majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

parliamentary examples

A

pros-
- Attlee’s government 1945-51, who set up the NHS and nationalisation
- Thatcher’s government that established privatisation of many industries

cons-
Starmers huge majority with only 34% of vote
currently 26 government whips

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

uncodified advantages

A

Flexible…
* Easy to change- all that is needed to change is statue or common law, much easier than a US amendment, as it is not entrenched
* Remains relevant and up to date- adapt easily

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

uncodified disadvantages

A

Uncertain…
* It is difficult to know what the constitution says
* Constitutions are more helpful when they are clear
The rules are not clear, especially unwritten ones like conventions, with statue, common laws and authoritative works being scattered in different sources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

uncodified examples

A

pros- devolution in reaction to nationalism in Scotland and Wales

cons- Salisbury convention, Royal prerogative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

unitary advantages

A

Democratic…
* Uncodified- supreme constitutional authority is with the house of commons
* So it emphasises the democratic nature of parliamentary sovereignty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

unitary disadvantages

A

Centralised…
* Over-centralised system
* Government power must be limited in a liberal system of government
* However, our constitution stresses the importance of one over-arching power too much
* Ineffective checks and balances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

unitary examples

A

pros- checks and balances made better by FOI act under Blair

cons- Parliaments Act reduced the power of the House of Lords so they are even less restricted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

flexible/unentrenched advantages

A

History and tradition…
* Has evolved with time, meaning old-fashioned ideas do not become entrenched
* Codified systems codify rights relevant to the time
The British constitution’s flexible nature means that it is given an ‘organic’ character- conservatives tend to think this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

flexible/unentrenched disadvantages

A

Weak protection of rights…
* There is nothing except desire for re-election that prevents a government from violating civil rights and liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

flexible/unentrenched examples

A
  • pro- leaving EU-The European Union Act 2020 after 1972 European Comunities Act
  • con- The Human Rights Act of 1998 improved rights protection, but it did not become an entrenched because provisions can be set aside by parliament, e.g. terrorism legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

statute law definition and example

A

laws decided and approved by parliament
most important source
Scotland Act 1998, establishing the Scottish Parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

common law definition and example

A
  • legal system in England that has developed over time from court decisions, rather than laws made by politicians.
  • R v R 1991 case- modern marriages equals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

conventions definition and example

A

unwritten understanding about how something should be done
- Royal Prerogative being used by the PM
- salisbury
- resign if lie to parliament
- debate before war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

authoritative works definition and example

A

books written by constitutional experts explaining how a political system is run
not binding
Walter Bagehot’s - The English Constitution from 1867

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 devolution pros

A
  • governments closer to their citizens
    - more accountable
    - more relevant
    -much more regionally sensitive
  • Scotland- almost always supported to be given more responsibilities by Scots
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 devolution cons

A
  • threatens stability of the UK
    -SNP maj. 2016, 2014 Indy Rev
  • regional unfairness
  • West-Lothian Q, EVEL failure
  • subordinate devolved bodies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 electoral reform pros

A

-AMS in Scotland and Wales gives smaller parties 1st seats- John Mason Ind. 2024
- STV power-sharing NI- DUP deputy, Sinn Fein 1st
- successful to make it more proportional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 electoral reform cons

A
  • disappointing participation- 55% Scotland 2016
  • not in Westminster
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 referendums pros

A
  • representative democracy
  • more legitimacy
  • sometimes high participation- 72% Brexit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 referendums cons

A
  • undermine Parliamentary Sovereignty- Brexit Cameron
  • divisions in society- Scottish Indy Rev
  • issues too complex for a public vote
29
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 HRA 1998 pros

A
  • citizens now have a clear list- culture of rights- example of USA, pleading the 5th
  • clear power of executive
  • increased role of judiciary- more restriction on parliament
30
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 HRA 1998 cons

A
  • can be abused- suspected terrorists Abu Hamza delayed deportation
  • judges unelected so less democratic
  • not entrenched so can be abolished- Cameron only stopped by coalition, 2019 manifesto wanted to change
  • judges can only ‘declare incompatible’ Rwanda’
  • Prevention of Terrorism Act- weak
31
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 FOI pros

A
  • right to know
  • files from any agency
  • more transparency, less disruption- stop and search FOI by Liberty in 2010 for police
32
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 FOI cons

A
  • 2008 expenses scandal- reduced trust, Blair claimed £116 to pay for his TV licence
  • ability to reject foi requests, £450, vexatious
33
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 HOL reform pros

A
  • free of electoral limits- experts can be from any party, 26 bishops, 184 crossbenchers
  • more asserted
  • prevents gridlock as not unelected, 800 unelected
34
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 HOL reform cons

A
  • 800, too big
  • 90 hereditaries
  • appointed- more power to PM, 87 appointed by Johnson
35
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 judicial reform pros

A
  • more willing to check on executive- Court of Appeal 2023 Rwanda,
    2019 Supreme Court Johnson prorogue Parliament unlawful
  • better social representation- JAC
36
Q

B and B Labour 1997 to 2010 judicial reform cons

A
  • no powers to restrict the government
  • just moved, not powerful enough- Lord Chancellor made into Justice secretary
  • Most Justices of the Supreme Court have been privately educated and attended Oxford or Cambridge
37
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform fixed term parliaments pros

A
  • no longer MP manipulative election dates
  • summer, poor/ strong candidates
38
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform fixed term parliaments cons

A
  • 5 years too long, zombie parliament
  • 2015
  • 2017 snap election, 2019 election- does not limit PM power
39
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform Wright reforms pros

A
  • select committees revitalised- 2018 universal credit, info on waiting times
  • e-petitions process huge success- 2019 fracking CPRE, over 200,000 sig.
  • chairs paid additional salary
40
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform Wright reforms cons

A
  • backbenchers do not compel gov. to act
  • e-pets just debated by BBBC
41
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform PCCs pros

A
  • democratic- stop and search still not been higher than 2012
42
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform PCC cons

A
  • 15% turnout
  • re election prioritised, not policing
43
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform Recall of MPs pros

A
  • conv. offence
  • barred from HOC
  • false/misleading information
  • Chris Davies, fake expenses, 2019, Brecon and Radnorshire
44
Q

Coalition 2010-2015 reform Recall pros MPs cons

A
  • petitions triggered by MPs not public
    -can be unsuccessful- North Antrim Ian Paisley 2018, not enough signatures- 10%
45
Q

Conservative 2015-2024 metro mayors pros

A
  • rep. to English regions- W-L less bad
  • 12 currently
  • ## Andy Burnham Bee transport network 2 pounds
46
Q

Conservative 2015-2024 metro mayors cons

A
  • around 40% 2024 lONDON, failed referendum in the North East in 2004
  • English parliament needed
  • Issues with lobbying against the government Sadiq Khan, ‘London is open’
47
Q

Conservative 2015-2024 EVEL pros

A
  • deals w W-L Q
  • differentiates certain areas- ‘London is open’
  • 83% want to give them more power
48
Q

Conservative 2015-2024 EVEL cons

A
  • unnecessarily complex- 8 additional legislation steps, deciding is EVEL applies to Bill
  • 2 classes of MP- claims 2nd class by SNP
49
Q

Conservative 2015-2024 Brexit pros

A
  • jan 2020
  • democratic
50
Q

Conservative 2015-2024 Brexit cons

A
  • referendum doubt - Cameron thought lose- overrides parliament
  • bad education- lie on bus
51
Q

NI devolution facts

A
  • 1998
  • suspended 6 times
  • Good Friday/Belfast Agreement
52
Q

NI devolution pros

A
  • peace mainly successful
  • benefitted union
53
Q

NI devolution cons

A
  • unstable- only period of extended devolved government was 2007-17- suspended 6 times
  • not brought together- politics wrought 93% of children in partisan schools
54
Q

Scotland devolution facts

A

1998
- Primary legislative powers
-1997 72% yes

55
Q

Scotland devolution pros

A
  • more appropriate- after 2014, Sturgeon put more emphasis on gender equality and childcare- baby boxes, Focus on university- 2015 Widening Access
  • good for Union- failed indy rev 2014
56
Q

Scotland devolution cons

A
  • risk to the union, Scotland overwhelmingly voted to remain 62%, SNP
  • SNP decline has damaged trust
    - Sturgeon resigned and arrested party funding- husband party chairman investigated for irregularity- damaged trust in politics
57
Q

Wales devolution facts

A

1997
- Secondary legislative powers- gained primary in a referendum in 2011
- Less powerful as they cannot impact Some welfare powers and Crown Estate

58
Q

Wales devolution pros

A
  • began legislation later put elsewhere- Trialled key policies - Organ donation opt out and plastic bag charge
  • political engagement- 2011 Second Ref showed an increase in support- 64%
59
Q

Wales devolution cons

A
  • people don’t care- 50% yes in 1997
  • new M4 corridor by Newport put off for over 20 years- not prioritised
60
Q

Aims of new Labour reforms

A

democratisation
modernisation
protection of rights
decentralisation

61
Q

Parliament effectiveness legislation pros

A
  • FPTP so strong government
  • Lords is more defiant since 1999 reform- 69 defeats from 2017-2019 by the Lords
62
Q

Private Members Bills facts

A
  • 1/4 bills reached 2nd reading 2010-24 PMBs
  • top 20 MPs drawn in a lottery for PMBs
  • Assisted dying 2024- huge publicity
63
Q

legislation cons

A
  • PMBs
  • Lords not strong enough- Johnson 2020 overturned his defeat by the Lords as he had a majority in commons
  • whips too involved in pre-leg scrutiny and PBCs- 2013 Dr Sarah Wollaston- kept off the Committee on the Health and Social Care Bill
  • Blair didn’t lose a vote in the commons from 1997 to 2005
64
Q

Parliament effectiveness representation pros

A
  • Most diverse parliament ever in 2019
  • LGBTQ+ 64 MPs
  • 14% HOC POC
  • HOL experts- make up for representation in commons- 26 bishops
65
Q

Parliament effectiveness representation cons

A
  • gender- 41% female
  • unelected and hereditary peers
  • 1/3 went to an elite Russel Group
  • FPTP to unproportional- 3% SNP 9 seats
66
Q

Parliament effectiveness scrutiny pros

A
  • 1/4 of Lords are cross benchers- less powerful whipping
  • 2005-2012, 55% of government bill amendments were by the lords
67
Q

Select Committees

A
  • Dr Sarah Wollaston- MPs chose to elect her Chair of the Health Select Committee in 2014
  • 2019 Jeremy Hunt became chair of health committee and as former health secretary- significant charity
  • Impactful- 30-40% taken onboard from select committees
68
Q

Parliament effectiveness scrutiny cons

A
  • HOL can only delay for 1 year
  • PMQs- Badenoch’s question about McVitie’s factories had-hob nobs and ginger nuts
  • Cameron Zingers