Revision (content from lecture #3) Flashcards

1
Q

Beliefs help us to understand the world and guide our actions BUT

A

Not all beliefs are equal

  • -> Certain
  • -> Less certain

More accurate beliefs have:

  • better understanding of the world
  • better predictions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Believing VS Knowing

How do we know that we know something?

A
  • i think this belief is completely accurate
  • I can explain to you the reasons or evidence that supports this belief
    • -if either of these standards is not met, we would usually say that you do not really ‘know’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Believing VS Knowing

How do we evaluate the accuracy of beliefs?

A

Examine the reasons or evidence that supports them

  • Ie. what is the justification
  • Routinely check and revise beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Knowledge and Truth

A
  • Many of us are socialised to believe that knowledge and truth are absolute and unchanging
  • Critical thinkers have a responsibility to engage actively in the learning process and participate in developing their own understanding of the world.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is there an active approach to knowing

A

Rarely is anything in science definitely ‘proven’
- Eg. researchers often publishing contrasting findings

What do we fo when experts disagree?

  • Analyse and evaluate all available information
  • Develop our own well reasoned beliefs
  • Recognise when we don’t have sufficient information to arrive at a well reasoned belief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluating the accuracy of beliefs:

A

How effectively do your beliefs explain what is taking place?

To what extent are the beliefs consistent with other beliefs you have about the world?

How effectively do your beliefs help you predict what will happen in the future?

To what extent are your beliefs supported by sound reasons and compelling evidence derived from reliable sources?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Falsifiability

A

Can you state conditions, or tests, under which the belief could be tested and even possibly disproved?

Example 1: I believe that if I place the milk in the fridge, it will become cold
This belief is falsifiable because I can conduct an experiment that could easily prove me wrong (i.e., placing milk in the fridge)

Example 2: I believe that my destiny is related to the positions of the planets and stars
This belief is impossible to falsify because you could not easily conduct an experiment to determine if this belief is accurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stages of knowing

A

Stage 1: the garden of eden
Stage 2: anything goes
Stage 3: thinking critically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Beliefs based on evidence

A

Authorities:
Are they knowledgeable and reliable in this area?

Written References:
What are the authors credentials? What evidence do they use?
(Is the evidence viable) (discussion uses results)

Factual Evidence:
What is the source of the information? Can the results be interpreted differently? Confounding variables?
(how have they generate the data? Correlational design?)

Personal Experience:
Are there alternate explanations or perspectives to consider?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Science

A

Process of understanding the world by developing testable theories with predictive power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Scientific Method

A
Observation
- Hypothesis
- Experiment
- Data Analysis
- Conclusions
Modify theory, new hypothesis, modify experiment
- Communicate results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Components of good science

A

Logical argument, based on facts and data

  • Not opinions
  • References given

Published in peer-reviewed journal articles

  • Contrary information is given when it exists, not just supporting information
  • What is not known is identified
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scientific Progress

A
  • Cumulative growth of knowledge over time
  • Existing theories retained, modified, abandoned
  • New theories adopted
  • Replicability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Scientific Reasoning (FiLCHeRS)

A

Falsifiability:
– Poses a hypothesis that could be disproved

Logic:
– Deductive reasoning

Comprehensiveness:
– Explains all relevant evidence

Honesty:
– Bias free

Replicability:
– Consistent results

Sufficiency:

    • Burden of proof is on claimant
    • Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
    • Appeals to authority inadequate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pseudoscience

A
  • Beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on the scientific method
  • Claims without hard data or facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Characteristics of pseudoscience

A
  • Vague language
  • Absence of peer review
  • Reliance on anecdotes, personal experience, and testimonials
  • Evasion of risky tests
    – Retreats to the
    supernatural
  • Tolerance of inconsistencies
  • Stagnation
17
Q

Science v Pseudoscience

A

-Key distinction between science and pseudoscience is approach to evidence

  • Pseudoscience relies on anecdotal evidence
    –> A claim of non- factual information based on experience
  • Unreliable
    –Beliefs
    – Selective attention to
    details
    – Distortion in retelling
    – Exaggeration
    – Reconstructive memory
18
Q

Science

A

Science relies on controlled, reproducible experimental evidence

  • Experimental group
      • Participants receive the IV or intervention

Control group:
- Participants (similar in demographics) who do not receive the IV or intention

  • Comparison of both groups after intervention will demonstrate effects of IV
    – No control group = no
    comparison
    – Unable to rule out alternative explanations