Reviews Of Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Define systematic review

A

Summary of medical literature on a topic, conducted using explicit methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define meta-analysis

A

Quantitative synthesis of results of 2 or more primary studies that addressed the same hypothesis in the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is involved in systematic review?

A

Research question, stating types of: study; participants; interventions; outcome measures

Finding studies, including published and grey literature

Appraising studies, reviews results of study search

Synthesising results, may include meta-analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the purpose of meta-analysis?

A

Synthesis of a large number of study results

Systematically collate study results

Reduce problems of interpretation, due to variation in sampling

Quantify effect sizes and their uncertainty as a pooled estimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the quality criteria of meta-analysis

A

Compilation of complete set of studies

Identification of common variable or category definition

Standardised data extraction

Analysis incorporating for sources of variation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interpret this forest plot

A

Squares = individual odds ratios

Lines = their 95% CI

Size of square = proportion of weight given to study

Diamond = pooled estimate, centre indicating pooled odds ratio, width represents pooled 95% CI

Vertical solid line = null hypothesis OR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the features of a systematic review?

A

Explicit

Transparent

Reproducible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the features of meta-analysis?

A

Quantitative synthesis of primary data

Summarises effect sizes and their uncertainty

Displayed as a forest plot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List difficulties of meta-analysis

A

Heterogeneity between studies

Variable quality of the studies

Publication bias in selection of studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define heterogeneity

A

Observed effects in studies are more different than we would expect by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What causes heterogeneity?

A

Methodological heterogeneity

Clinical heterogeneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define methodological heterogeneity

A

Differences in methods (study design)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define clinical heterogeneity

A

Differences in patients, interventions, outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can we do about heterogeneity?

A

2 approaches when calculating the pooled estimate (OR and its 95% CI):

1) Fixed effect model

2) Random effects model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is fixed effect model?

A

Used to calculate pooled estimate (OR and its 95% CI)

Assumes studies are estimating exactly the same true effect size

Protects against heterogeneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is random effects model?

A

Used to calculate pooled estimate (OR and its 95% CI)

Incorporates heterogeneity by assuming that studies are estimating similar, but not the same, true effect size

Protects against heterogeneity BUT does not explain it

17
Q

Is fixed effect or random effects model better?

A

Point estimate is similar for both

BUT: random effects model is better

  • Wider 95% CI
  • More equal weighting of studies
18
Q

What is sub-group analysis?

A

Explains heterogeneity

Takes into account: study characteristics; participant profile

19
Q

Variable quality can be due to:

A

Poor study design

Poor design protocol

Poor protocol implementation

20
Q

Order studies into more to less prone to bias:

A

Case-control

Cohort

NRCT

RCT

21
Q

How to combat variable quality of studies?

A

Define basic quality standard, and only include studies satisfying this criteria

Score each study for its quality, and then:

  • incorporate quality score with weighting of study
  • use sub-group analysis
22
Q

What is publication bias?

A

Studies with ‘favourable’ results are more likely to be published

Any systematic review/ meta-analysis can be flawed by this

23
Q

How do we identify publication bias?

A

Check meta-analysis protocol for method of identification of studies

Funnel plot

Use statistical test for publication bias

24
Q

What is a funnel plot?

A

Plot of measure of study size (Y), against effect (X)

If no publication bias: plot will be symmetrical

25
Q

Which shows evidence of bias?

A

Right funnel plot