Review of legality Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Article (direct challenge of legality of EU act)

A

Art 263 TFEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which acts can be reviewed?

A
  • intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties
  • e.g measure by parliament, a decision by the Commission to close a file on a complaint, acts by the Council (but not by members of the Council as representatives of their MS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

negative acts (refusal to do something)

A
  • based on the nature of the request
  • e.g. refusal to withdraw legislation depends on legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

grounds

A
  • lack of competence (wrong or inadequate legal base)
  • infringement of an essential procedural requirement (most commonly used, encompasses both formally laid down rules and informal rules of fairness)
  • infringement of the Treaties or an rule relating to their application (wide range including proportionality and subisdiarity, but may be justified by benefits for the internal market)
  • misuse of power (rare)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

privileged applicants

A

MS, EP, Council, Commission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

semi-prvileged applicants

A

Court of Auditors, European Central Bank, Committee of the Regions for the purpose of protecting their prerogatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Locus standi of non-privileged applicants

A
  • condition: present legal interest of the applicant (future only if harm/prejudice is unavoidable)
  • acts is addressed to the applicant or
  • act is of direct and individual concern to the applicant or
  • regulatory act with no implementing measure is of direct concern to the applicant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

criteria for direct concern

A
  • directly affects legal situation (possible exception: infringement of fundamental rights)
  • certainty that implementing measures affecting the applicant will be taken by the addressee (not necessarily an obligation on the addressee)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

criteria for individual concern

A

Plaumann test
- exclusive concern
- applicant needs to be singled out in the same way the addressee of the act is singled out
- applicant/s need to be a closed group of people who were affected by the act in a specific way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

criticism of the Plaumann test

A
  • an act that affects many is more difficult to challenge than one that affects few
  • legislative measure without implementing mesures can often only be broken rather than challenged directly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

types of relevant legal acts

A
  • legislative act
  • non-legislative act: act of specific application, act of general application (with or without implementing measures)
  • regulatory acts without implementing measures: general application, directly affect persons’ legal situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

regulatory acts without implementing measures

A
  • general application
  • directly affect persons’ legal situation –> must have direct effect
  • any implementing measures count, even when national authorities have no discretion in how to implement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

failure to act proceedings - article, locus standi, scope

A
  • Art 265 TFEU
  • privileged applicants: institutions and bodies, MS
  • non-privileged applicants: same rules as Art 263
  • scope: limited because institutions usually have power rather than duty to act –> discretion (only need to adopt a position)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

indirect challenge

A
  • Art 2777 TFEU
  • proceedings against an implementing measure which call into question the validity of the Union measures that is implemented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

examples of proceedings that may be dependent in the validity of another Union act (can lead to indirect challenge)

A
  • challenge of implementing measure
  • preliminary ruling procedure
  • infringement action against MS
  • action regarding the validity of a contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

restrictions of indircet challenges

A
  • acts of general application (wide scope though)
  • direct challenge impossible
17
Q

Treaty article regulating non-contractual liability/damages

A

Art 340 TFEU

18
Q

criteria for non-contractual liability regarding unlawful acts

A

very similar to state liability:
- breach of a rule that confers rights on individuals
- suffciently serious breach
- direct causal link between breach and damage

19
Q

criteria for non-contractual liability reagrding lawful acts

A
  • actual damage
  • causal link to conduct of the institution
  • unusual and special nature of the damage