review Flashcards
What is an Ad Hominem?
A personal attack
what is another name for Ad Populum?
Appeal to celebrity
this fallacy equates something being true because most people believe it or it is endorsed by someone
Ad Populum
the fallacy in which something is true because you feel it is true
Affective fallacy
which fallacy is this:
If P, then Q. Not P: therefore, not Q
denying the antecedent
which fallacy is this:
If P, then Q. If Q, then P
affirming the consequent
what is another name for the equivocation fallacy?
Amphiboly
which fallacy is ambiguous/ can be read multiple ways?
equivocation fallacy
this fallacy claims it’s better to not know/ can be proven but doesn’t want to be
appeal to ignorance
this fallacy claims that something produced ‘naturally’ is better than the same thing being manufactured
appeal to nature
this fallacy claims that since something has been done a certain way for a long time is better than any new way of doing it
appeal to tradition/common practice
this fallacy appeals to one’s ego or vanity, ‘sucking up’
apple polishing
this is where u adopt a claim/join a group bc it has become successful/popular
bandwagon
this fallacy states;
P is Q because Q is P
begging the question
where a person or their ideas are credible because they are famous or well-known
blind authority
in which someone claims an idea is true because the opposition is unable to produce proof in the moment
burden of proof
this fallacy states that since 2 events happen at the same time, they are related
Cum Hoc
claiming something didn’t happen when it may have
denial
criticizing another because they have something one does/does not
envy/jelousy
this fallacy claims that what works for the whole works for the parts
fallacy of division
this is where you compare 2 ideas that are not comparable
false analogy
the claim that there are only 2 options/solutions when others are available
false dilemma
this is where one plays with the odds
gambler’s fallacy
this fallacy claims something’s value depends on where it came from
genetic/originative
this fallacy claims that because 2 things have a relation, they share the same values
guilt by association
in which you shame someone for not taking action
guilt tripping
claiming one experience will reflect all experiences with the same thing
hasty generalization
contradicting one’s own argument
inconsistency fallacy
claiming to know another’s intentions
intentional fallacy
pairing 2 or more unrelated ideas
non sequitur
responding with anger and contempt
outrage
taking action because others goaded you into it
peer pressure
claiming that if something is not 100% effective, it should not be used
perfectionist fallacy
appealing to emotions by pointing out someone’s lowly conditions
pity
preventing the opposition by attacking their credibility before they had a chance to make their claims
poisoning the well
a false causality: claiming that one event caused another simply because one happened after the other
Post Hoc
attempting to make the audience fearful or disgusted
scare tactic
claiming one event will lead to another unlikely occurrence
slippery slope
making a general claim about people who share a certain common factor
stereotyping
distorting an argument or representing it as something it is not
straw man
if someone else can do it, then so can I
two wrongs make a right
a claim that has no way of being tested
untestable conclusion
What are subjective claims?
things you believe/prefer
what are objective claims
things that are true (googled)/can be proven
what are the 2 parts of an argument
a premise and a conclusion
what makes a statement an argument?
it can be contested/objected to
you feel like you are more resourceful or overestimate your abilities
better than average illusion
this cognitive bias is where we listen to ppl bc they have more ‘power’
in group bias
in which the conclusion makes so much sense that you believe it
belief bias
in which you attach more weight to evidence that supports ur viewpoint
confirmation bias
unconsciously assigns a higher probability to an event based on how often one thinks of said event
availability heuristics
assuming our opinions and those held by ppl around us are shared by society at large
false consensus effect
bais that leads us to overestimate the percentage of our answers on a subject are correct
overconfidence effect
attaching more weight to negative information than to positive info
negativity bias
tendency to comply with instructions from the authority
obedience to authority
being more strongly motivated to avoid a loss than to accrue a gain
loss aversion
which argument proves or demonstrates the conclusion?
deductive
which argument supports the conclusion?
inductive
if the premise is true then the conclusion is true
valid
what makes a strong inductive argument?
if it has more evidence that supports the conclusion
this mode persuades ppl by personal attributes, inc. background, reputation and expertise
ethos
this mode plays off emotions/ uses rhetoric
pathos
this mode persuades by information and rational argument
logos
in which u are unable to determine what a word includes/excludes, a lack of clarity
vague