Retrival Failure Flashcards
Encoding Specificity Principle
Endel Tulving + Donald Thomson
Endel Tulving And Donald Thomson 1973
Memory most effective if info present at encoding is also available at time of retrieval
Context Dependent Forgetting
Ethel Abernethy
Godden and Baddeley
Ethel Abernethy
4 experimental conditions
Some students tested in teaching room by usal instructor: Performed best
Others tested in different room same/different instructor
> Familiar things acted as memory cues
Godden + Baddeley 1975
4 experimental conditions
Learn set of words on land/underwater
> Recall occurred when matched recall of environment
State Dependent Forgetting
Mental state you are in
Goodwin et al
Goodwin et al 1969
Ask male volunteers to remember list of words drunk/sober
24 hours after when sober
> Infomation learned when drunk is available when in same state later
Lot of research support
Strength
E: Wealth of research evidence documented importance of retrieval cues on memory
E: Relevance to everyday memory experience
Real-world application
Strength
Abernethy’s research: revise in same room you take exams (use imagination)
Smith: Just thinking of room you did original learning was effective as being in same room
Retrieval cues do not always work
Limitation
E: Cues not very effective, learning related to more than cues
Smith and Vela: context effects largely eliminated when learning meaningful material
E: Explain some, they don’t explain everything