EWT Flashcards
3 Stages Of EWT
1: Encode details of event in LTM
2: Witness retain info for long period
- memorises can be lost/ modified
- interference with memories
3: Retrieves memory from storage
Loftus And Palmer - leading questions
Aim: leading questions would distort accuracy of recall
Procedure: 45 students, shown 7 traffic accidents
1 question: ‘smashed’, ‘bumped’,‘collided’,‘contacted’
Findings: 41mph - smashed, 32mph - contacted
Conclusion: questions can affect accuracy of memory
Loftus And Palmer - Post event info
Aim: Test post event information
Procedure: 3 groups
1: Smashed
2: Hit
3: No verb
Did you see broken glass? (no broken glass)
Findings:
‘smashed’ group 15% saw broken glass
control group: 5%
Conclusion: shows significant effect of post event
Is EWT unreliable?
Yuille and Cutshall: interviewed 13 people
> included 2 misleading questions
- witnesses provided accurate recall
Suggests: post event information may not affect memory in real life – EWT unreliable
Loftus - Weapons Effect
Procedure: man came out room
Condition 1: with pen + grease on hands
Condition 2: knife covered in blood
- Recall man from 50 photos
Findings:
Condition 1: 49% accurate
Condition 2: 33% accurate
Conclusion: When anxious + aroused witness focuses on weapon
Weapon effect - evaluation
High ecological validity, participants didn’t know it was staged
Ethical issues: participants stressed at knife
Deffenbacher et al - Anxiety
Meta analysis from 18 studies
Found: high levels of anxiety/stress negatively impact accuracy of eyewitness memory
> Emotional arousal enhances accuracy of memory
Weapon Focus may not be caused by anxiety
E: Pickel: Thief is enters with:
Scissors/wallet (low surprise)
Handgun/chicken (high surprise)
> Identification least accurate in high surprise conditions not high threat
E: Weapob focus related to surprise rather than anxiety
Real life studies vs lab studies
E: Lab studies do not create real levels of anxiety during crime
> Deffenbacher agrees: real life studies associated with greater loss in accuracy
E: Low ecological validity
No simple conclusion
Halford + Milne: violent crimes, victims, more accurate in recall than nonviolent crimes
E: no simple rule about the effect of anxiety on EWT