Respondent conditioning Flashcards

1
Q

respondent behaviours are _

A

elicited reflex behaviours or controlled by stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

typically, biologically significance reflexes have ____

A

survival value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did ivan pavlov do

A

he was a physiologist studying digestion, specifically in dogs
measured dogs saliva in response to dry meat
but dogs became psychic and would salivate when they heard his footsteps or entered the room
decided to use more consistent stimulus, his wife’s metronome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

unconditioned stimulus (US)

A

stimulus that elicit a unconditioned, reflexive unconditioned response without any learning or conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

unconditioned response (UR)

A

response to unconditioned stimulus that is reflexively naturally elicited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

neutral stimulus (NS)

A

stimulus that have no effect on reflexive response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

conditioned stimulus (CS)

A

initially neutral stimulus that is paired with unconditioned stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

conditioned response (CR)

A

response elicited by conditioned stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

respondent conditioning (classical or pavlovian)

A

entails manipulating a stimuli to elicit reflexive responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

process of associating an NS with US to form a CS is called ___

A

conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“conditional”

A

depend on learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

“unconditional”

A

reflexive, does not depend on learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

trace conditioning

A

NS presented before US, they do not overlap.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

delay conditioning

A

onset of NS occurs before US, some overlap in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

simultaneous conditioning

A

NS and US presented at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

backward conditioning

A

US presented before NS, like trace conditioning, no overlap

17
Q

higher order conditioning

A

CS is paired with another NS.
NS + US -> CS (first order conditioning)
CS + US -> CS (second order conditioning)
e.g.
flashing light + shock -> fear response
flashing light -> fear response (first order conditioning)
flashing light + 1800 hz tone -> fear response
1800 hz tone -> fear response (second order conditioning)

18
Q

CERs

A

watson argued that it was not childhood sexual conflict that caused phobias, he said it was conditioned emotional response

19
Q

Little Albert experiment

A

little albert was healthy 11 month old who was not really afraid of anything, including rats.
showed white rat, and when albert reached for it, struck a metal bar and made loud noise
in repeated sessions, used simultaneous conditioning by presenting rat and sound together.
little albert cried and crawled away (escape behaviour)

20
Q

operant stimulus generalization of little albert

A

generalized the rat to all furry object. afraid of all stimuli that was furry

21
Q

respondent stimuli discrimination of little albert

A

albert played with blocks normally

22
Q

respondent extinction

A

repeated presentation of CS without US can weaken CR

23
Q

spontaneous recovery

A

presenting CS after extinction can produce CR

24
Q

what was initial thought on little albert?

A

had neurological and developmental deficits. did not perform gaze monitoring. used hand scooping instead of sophisticated pincer grip

25
Q

what is gaze monitoring

A

looking to see where other people are looking

26
Q

what was the new thoughts on little albert after the first search?

A

found evidence that little albert did show gaze monitoring and pincer grip to pick up marble. found that little albert did not like dogs

27
Q

factors influencing conditioning

A
  • nature of NS and US. high intensity US have high salience to NS.
  • temporal relationship between NS and US. NS should precede US, shorter time better. optimal is 0.5 s
  • contingency between NS and US. should occur together on every trial.
  • if there are multiple NS, the one most consistently associated with US will become CS
  • number of pairing of US and NS. more repetition the better
  • previous exposure NS/prior learning
28
Q

what is exception to temporal relationship between NS and US

A

taste aversion. doesn’t have to be conditioned fast.

29
Q

E for respondent conditioning

A

elicited

30
Q

E for operant conditioning

A

evoked, emitted

31
Q

difference between respondent and operant conditioning

A
  • respondent conditioning involves pairing of NS and US before a response, operant conditioning involves consequences after a response
  • extinction for respondent conditioning occurs when CS presented without US, and for operant is when reinforcement for behaviour is not there anymore
  • they may work together though
32
Q

looking at little albert with respondent vs operational conditioning

A

respondent:
-little albert’s US was sound and NS was rat, which became CS that resulted in CER of white rat.
operant:
-the white rat is antecedent stimulus Sd that evoked avoidance behaviour which produced feelings of relief as a consequence (Sr-) or negative reinforcement