Resilience Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Stress: negative effects

A

Research typically focuses on the negative effects of stress exposure

  • Mental health: e.g., major depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder
  • Physical health: e.g., cardiovascular disease, immunosuppression (stress precipitation the progression from HIV to AIDS)

studies have shown that most people experience at least one even that qualifies as a life trauma
traumatic events are very prevalent - happen often and to most of us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stress resilience

A

But, there’s actually a large variability in how people respond to stress
Many people do not seem to be negatively effected by stress, and some can even benefit from stress exposure
If we want to understand the influence of stress exposure, we need to acknowledge the full spectrum of its effects
-this arose at the same time that positive psychology came on to the scene
-some stress can benefit some

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why study resilience?

A
  • Understanding the factors that contribute to resilience can help inform interventions for those more vulnerable (if we can really understand what characteristics are the secret to resistance we can take that to treat people who this doesn’t come more naturally to)
  • Understanding that there can be beneficial effects of stress exposure can help bring meaning to negative experiences (research shows that many people come out of negative experiences relatively unscathed or come out stronger because of it)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is “resilience”?

A

Umbrella term that includes 3 different responses to stress:
Sustainability
Recovery
Growth

(Zautra, Arewasikporn, & Davis, 2010)

sustainability and recovery are about baseline functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sustainability

A

Maintaining functioning through a stressor with minimal disruption
-keep going and functioning at normal levels through that stressor and beyond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Recovery

A

Disruption, but quickly “bounce back” to baseline functioning following a major stressor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Growth

A

Enhanced adaptation beyond original levels of functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Resilience is the norm?

A

Traditionally, resilience thought to be rare
Just for “supercopers”, or a sign of denial or hidden psychopathology
-more common than we thought
Now resilience thought to be “ordinary magic” (Masten, 2001)
-it is remarkable that people can do this and it’s remarkably prevalent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Research approaches to resilience: Approach #1

A

Researchers examining developmental psychopathology in children who had experienced adversity
-physical abuse, parents with mental illness, parents with substance or alcohol abuse, poverty
Noted that a striking number of these children did not seem to exhibit long-term negative effects of these experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Childhood abuse and adult health

A

Isle of Wight community sample (N=364) to examine the prevalence of child abuse and its relationship to adulthood psychopathology (Collinshaw et al., 2007)
44 adults in the sample had experienced sexual or physical abuse as children
Assessed current and past psychopathology
-major depression, dysthymia, anxiety, panic disorder, social phobia, PTSD, OCD, anorexia and bulimia, alcohol and substance use or dependence, suicidality

Results
55.6% reported some form of psychopathology
Thus, 44.4% reported no current or past psychopathology (resilient)
-This resilient group also showed lower rates of personality difficulties, criminality, and relationship problems compared to non-abused group
-Also reported fewer physical health problems compared to non-abused group

take home:
resilience is remarkably common and it isn’t saying that child abuse isn’t detrimental, but it is remarkable that so many could come out without any negative consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Research approaches to resilience: Approach #2

A

Examining responses to “potentially traumatic events” (Bonanno, 2004)
-Natural disasters (e.g., Hurricane Katrina)
-Traumatic injury
-Bereavement
-War
Findings across a wide range of negative events suggest that the majority of adults maintain healthy functioning in the face of even extreme stressors

Adjustment following PTE:
35-65% - Resilient - can maintain functioning through stressful event
15-25% - Recovered - can bounce back quickly in aftermath of event
0-15% - Delayed - initially low distress but become more distressed as time goes on
5-30% - Chronic - consistent distressed response

Responses to 9/11 attacks :
Participants: 2,752 adults living in or near New York City
Contacted 6 months after 9/11
Assessed PTSD symptoms since the attacks

Results:
65.1% of participants reported 0-1 PTSD symptoms (resilient group)
28.9% of participants >=2 PTSD symptoms, in the absence of PTSD (recovery group)
6% probable PTSD

Thus, significant majority “resilient”
Resilience is still remarkably prevalent in those directly and personally affected!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Research approaches to resilience: Approach #3

A

Study of people diagnosed with life threatening medical conditions (e.g., HIV, cancer)
Examine how they respond and what factors are related to positive psychological adjustment, remission, survival

Distress Trajectories in the First Year After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis

  • found pretty much the same distribution as Bonano
  • 15% chronic
  • 15% delayed
  • 33% recovery
  • 36% no distress (resilient)

Resilience was predicted by mastery
-they looked at psychological factors that could predict trajectories and the only one they found was mastery
Mastery = belief that life is not ruled by fate but that one is personally able to influence the outcomes of important events or situations (e.g., “What happens to me in the future mostly depends on me”)
-it is basically a sense of control - having a sense of control over the results of their breast cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

personal growth and positive changes

A

Some individuals not only maintain healthy functioning following a major stressor, but actually report personal growth and positive changes

  • Benefit-finding (Affleck & Tennen, 1996)
  • Thriving (Carver, 1998)
  • Post-traumatic growth (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996)

Studies across different types of adversities (illness, divorce, war, cancer) show that >50% of people report some positive change (Updegraff & Taylor, 2000; Stanton, Bower, & Low, 2006)

  • Enhanced relationships
  • Improved perceptions of self
  • Appreciation of life
  • Enhanced spirituality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Psychological characteristics associated with resilience

A

Personality Factors
Social Factors
Appraisal and Coping Styles
World Views and Beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Resilience: Personality Factors

A

optimism, positive emotions, humor, mastery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Resilience: Social Factors

A

high perceived social support

17
Q

Resilience: Appraisal and Coping Styles

A

challenge appraisals, active coping

-approach oriented coping

18
Q

Resilience: World Views and Beliefs

A

spiritual/religious beliefs, belief that the world is a fair and benevolent place
-the things that happened to you happened for a reason - orders of the world

19
Q

Stress inoculation: Theory

A

“Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” (Nietzsche, 1889)
Stress inoculation theory (Meichenbaum, 1993)
-A vaccine is a limited dose of a pathogen that mobilizes the immune system so that it can better combat future infections with that pathogen
-Similarly, stress in limited doses can help you to mobilize the resources needed to better cope with future stress

20
Q

Stress inoculation: Observational Study

A

Seery, Holman, and Cohen Silver (2010)
Longitudinal study in a national sample of adults (N = 2,398)
Question: Does moderate prior stress exposure lead to psychological resilience to a subsequent stressor?
-Assessed lifetime stress exposure (life events checklist)
-6 months later, assessed recent stressful events (life events checklist again)
-Examined mental health outcomes in response to recent stressors

Individuals with moderate levels of prior adversity had lower distress, functional impairment, and post-traumatic stress symptoms in response to a recent stressor

-observational studies are too limited - should be tested in a lab

21
Q

Stress inoculation: Laboratory study 1

A

Seery et al. (2013), Study 1:
-Q: Does moderate prior life stress lead to psychological resilience to a controlled, laboratory stressor?
-Participants: 147 college undergraduates
-Cold pressor task (immerse hand in ice-cold water for as long as able to tolerate it)
Outcomes:
-catastrophizing (eg “I thought the pain might overwhelm me”)
-ratings of pain intensity
-ratings of pain unpleasantness
-negative affect after task
-immersion time

Those who reported moderate levels of prior adversity demonstrated:

  • Less catastrophizing
  • Lower ratings of pain intensity
  • Lower ratings of pain unpleasantness
  • Longer immersion time (marginally significant)
  • Less negative affect

…compared to those with low and high prior adversity

22
Q

Stress inoculation: Laboratory study 2

A

Seery et al. (2013), Study 2:

  • Does moderate prior life stress lead to physiological resilience to a controlled laboratory stressor?
  • Participants: 216 college undergraduates
  • “An important test of nonverbal intelligence” (computer generated stressful test of intelligence)

Outcomes:
Cardiovascular response profiles consistent with challenge or threat appraisals
under threat and challenge you expect to see different levels of these different measures - you have lower peripheral resistance under challenge vs higher under threat (looking at CV in response to Challenge or Threat)

Those with moderate prior life stress showed cardiovascular responses consistent with challenge (vs. threat) appraisals
Different patterns of CV response expected under challenge vs. threat appraisals

23
Q

Positive emotions and resilience

A

Participants: 57 female undergraduates
Assessed trait resilience at baseline using a self-report scale (Ego-Resiliency Scale)
-looks at resilience as a trait as opposed to a response to a stressor
Participants told they would have 60 seconds to prepare a 3-minute speech that would be videotaped and evaluated by peers
Assessed positive/negative emotions and cardiovascular responses during speech preparation

Results:
Manipulation check:
-Participants reported feelings of anxiety during speech preparation
-Also exhibited cardiovascular reactivity
Higher trait resilience associated with:
-More positive emotions during the task
-Shorter duration of cardiovascular reactivity (faster recovery)
-Positive emotions may “undo” the lingering cardiovascular aftereffects of negative emotions
trait resilience—>more positive emotions—>faster CV recovery

Ego-Resiliency Scale items:
“I quickly get over and recover from being startled”
“I get over my anger at someone reasonably quickly”
“I would be willing to describe myself as a pretty ‘strong’ personality”
“I enjoy dealing with new and unusual situations”
“I am generous with my friends”
“I am more curious than most people”

24
Q

Neurophysiological correlates of resilience

A

cardiovascular responses consistent with challenge appraisals
Faster CV recovery
Neuropeptide Y

25
Q

Neuropeptide Y (NPY)

A

Neurotransmitter in the brain and SNS
Increasing NPY levels in rats leads to reduced anxiety-like behaviors to stress tasks
Thought to serve as a buffer against the negative effects of stress on the brain

26
Q

NPY in soldiers exposed to military survival training

A

Participants: 21 active-duty male soldiers (10 non-Special Forces and 11 Special Forces) in survival training
Soldiers are captured and subjected to intense military interrogation
-based on real experiences of american soldiers who were captured in Vietnam and WWII
NPY levels measured at baseline and after interrogation
Received a “interrogation behavior score”, indicating how well they held up during the interrogation

Results:
NPY increased with interrogation stress
Correlated with increases in cortisol
Increased more for Special Forces soldiers (“hardiest” soldiers) compared to non-Special Forces
NPY correlated with interrogation behavior scores (high NPY = better performance during stress
Special Forces soldiers had higher levels of NPY in response to acute stress
These higher levels of NPY correlated with better performance under stress
Suggests that NPY might be a key component of stress resilience

27
Q

Summary of resilience

A

Resilience is “ordinary magic”
Psychosocial factors related to resilience include mastery, positive emotions, appraisals
Moderate prior stress exposure may be another contributing factor for resilience (stress inoculation)
Physiological correlates of resilience include CV responses consistent with challenge appraisals, faster cardiovascular recovery, elevated neuropeptide Y

28
Q

Heart Rate Variability (Vagal Tone)

A

PNS (the brakes - SNS is the gas)
-modulates many important bodily processes through the vagus nerve, including the heart (heart beat, breathing, gut, liver)

29
Q

vagal control of the heart

A
  • can be measured by looking at the variability in heart rate
  • your heart rate gets faster and slower with your breathing - increases when you inhale, decreases when you exhale
  • this can be measured using electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • measure of PNS innervation (non-invasive measure)
30
Q

Vagal Tone as a Measure of Physical Health

A

great predictor of:

  • heart attack or mortality from CVD
  • all cause mortality
  • depression and anxiety
31
Q

Vagus Nerve and Inflammation

A

influences heart rate and pro-inflammatory cytokine production by monocytes
-people with higher heart rate variability have lower inflammation

measure of resilient strong healthy person? maybe

32
Q

Measuring heart rate variability

A

-use electrodes to monitor heart beat
-data is processed to extract measure of heart rate variability
two types of measures:
-respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
-high frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV)
-both were assessed in the Kok study, but analyses focused on HRV