Residency - Prostate Flashcards
**
The “default” prostate cancer
Acinar adenocarcinoma
Major features of prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma
- Usually fairly indolent
- Hormonally responsive
- Often multifocal - multiple tumors in the same prostate, usualy in the posterior of the gland
- The single most common male cancer
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - atrophic variant
This is a tricky one! The cytology is very similar to normal glandular atrophy. Luckily, these glands are often adjacent to more obviously malignant ones, and of course will have no myoepithelial cells.
May occur as the primary variant, or occur sporadically after therapy.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - Pseudohyperplastic variant
Simulates normal prostatic hyperplasia with papillary infoldings and luminal undulations and branching.
Round nuclei, not pseudostratified, with prominent nucleoli.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - Foamy gland variant
Abundant, foamy, xanthomatous cytoplasm with small, simple, pyknotic nuclei.
Often among more typical prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma variants.
Can look kind of like Cowper’s glands, so make sure to rule these out!
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - microcystic variant
Large, dilated round glands with flattened luminal
cells. Like atrophic variant, this can simulate atrophy.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - Mucinous or Colloid variant
The requisite for diagnosis is ≥25% of tumor has extracellular mucin pools. As such, this can only be Dx’d on prostatectomy. So, on the biopsy, you would say “Pancreatic acinar adenocarcinoma with mucinous features”
When assigning a grade, try to mentally subtract the mucin.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - Signet ring-like variant
All in the name. Looks like signet ring morphology, but not as perfect as the gastric variant.
Like all other signet ring cell malignancies, you have to consider that it may be a metastasis – especially from the stomache or elsewhere in the GI tract.
Gleason 5 by definition. This variant has a poorer prognosis.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - sarcomatoid variant
This is a really tough diagnosis to make on morphology alone – you are going to need stains. Just be aware that a sarcomatoid spindle cell variant exists for this entity.
Gleason 5 by definition. This variant has a poorer prognosis.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - hypernephroid variant (sometimes called vanishing variant)
Looks like clear cell RCC, eh? Wrong! It’s prostate.
. . . probably. You have to rule out a metastatic clear cell process. But yeah, prostate cancer can look like this too. Gleason 4 by definition.
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma - pleomorphic giant cell variant
Bad news. But that’s kind of obvious, everything pleomorphic is bad news.
Of note, a spindle cell component disqualifies this diagnosis – that would make it sarcomatoid variant, which can have pleomorphic components.
Gleason 5 by definition. Poorer prognosis.
ERG in prostate biopsies
Used for staining cancer specifically before we had AMACR.
Only ~50% sensitive compared to the ~90% sensitivity of AMACR.
How many atypical glands do you need to call it prostate cancer?
There is no universal definition, but most urologic pathologists will want to see at least three
“Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation”
A descriptive term, not really a diagnosis.
Designed to be used when you have a collection of small glands suspicious for cancer but lack definitive diagnostic features or are too small to be certain that they do not represent the edge of a benign lesion.
Basal cells may be missing in benign small glands, so, immunohistochemistry is primarily useful to disprove cancer, not to prove cancer. Detection of even rare basal cells in any of the glands of the suspicious population essentially excludes carcinoma for the entire population.
Clinical followup for a biopsy like this is. . . repeat biopsy.
General cytologic/architectural features of benign vs malignant prostate glands
How to report discontinuous prostate cancer
For right now, there is still debate as to whether to call this “10%” or “95%”. There is evidence to suggest that the linear total correlates better, but there is no consensus.
Report both (linear and additive) in these situations unless told otherwise.
What features count as extraprostatic extension?
- Invasion of fat
- Perineural invasion within a neurovascular bundle
- Invasion of the urinary bladder neck (smooth muscle layers without benign prostate)
- Invasion of the seminal vesicle (muscular wall of the vesicle)
- Invasion of extraprostatic loose connective tissue (may be difficult to eval on a core biopsy)
- “Beyond the confines of the normal prostate”, which cannot be evaluated on biopsy at all – this is for resections
Genetic features of prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma
- Recurrent mutations of the ETS transcription factor family (most commonly TMPRSS2-ERG fusion)
- TP53
- PTEN
- BRCA2
Treatment effect in the prostate - anti-hormonal therapy
Benign glands: diffuse atrophy with prominent basal cells
Adenocarcinoma: atrophic with vacuolated cytoplasm and small inconspicuous nuclei/nucleoli (shown)
Relevant history for prostate cancer biopsies
- Age
- Hormonally active medications
- BRAC2 status
- If previous diagnosis, reason for biopsy?
- Previous therapies (rads, anti-hormonal)?