Researchers Flashcards
Lamb et al (1982)
Studied att with grandparents and siblings
- found that infants had different attachments rather than hierarchal with mother at top.
- (father=play) (mothers= comfort)
REFUTES BOWLBY who suggests mothers are the most significant att. Figures.
Bowlby (1951)
- Monotropic theory
- Believed Infants formed one significant attachment - Mother
Schaffer + Emerson (1964)
Stages of att.
Stage of attachment development
-composed research that found 4 stages of attachment
Pre. Indiscrimate.Discrimate & Multiple att.
REFUTED BOWLBY who rejected the concept of multiple attachments.
Harlow (1959)
Animal study
Conducted a study with Rhesus monkeys
- with 4 conditions (wire mother with food and wire mother with comfort)
- Found Rhesus monkeys went to wire mother with comfort most of the time.
- Rhesus monkeys have an innate need for contact comfort
- COMFORT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN FOOD FOR FORMING ATTACHMENTS
Lorenz (1935)
(Nidifugous birds)
Animal study
Investigated imprinting with geese.
- 1 hatched with mothers
- 2 hatched with Lorenz
- Found that a critical period between 4-25 hours must be made to form att.
SUPPORTED BY BOWLBY - believes there is a critical period In humans (0-3 years)
Learning Theory
Classical > food associated with mother= pleasure > att
Operant > positive reinforcement = crying to receive food > maintains att.
Negative reinforcement - giving food to stop crying.
Brown et al (2010)
Belsky et al (2009) found the same with marital intimacy.
Role of fathers
Assessed att patterns - 68 families
Infants aged 12-13 m
-Found supportive co-parenting lead to better father-infant att.
-not mothers
-important for fathers
Lamb et al (1987)
Role of fathers
Found fathers Can quickly develop sensitive responsiveness.
- suggests it is not an innate ability for women only.
- Also found, infants prefer interacting with fathers when positive.
Schaffer + Emerson (1950)
REFUTES LEARNING THEORY
- 39% cases > mother is not main att.
- mother is not main att. figure
- food is not main explanation of att.
Dollard + Miller (1950)
1 year = 2000 feeds
- The care giver is associated with food
- pleasure = developed att.
-SUPPORTS LEARNING THEORY.
Klaus + Kenall (1976)
Physical contact
Compared mums who had physical contact w/ infants for several hours with mums who only had physical contact during feeding time after birth.
- found that a year later these effects wer noticeable
- more physical contact = stronger form of att.
Dunkin
Believes physical contact is not cause of att
Attention is.
Melzoff + Moore (1977)
Reciprocity / mimicking
Infants aged 2-3 weeks
Mimicked adults facial expressions
-supports it to be an innate ability for forming att.
-seen in infants less than 3 days - biological.
Papousek (1991)
Caregiverese
Using a high pitch tone to gain response from infant = cross-cultural
-caregiverese = innate
Biological mechanism for interaction > formation of att.
Condon + Sander (1974)
Interactional synchrony
Recordings of infants movement to find they co-ordinated actions in a sequence as if having a conversation.
Supports Interactional synchrony reinforce attachment bonds