Research Methods (MET) Flashcards
What is the difference between an aim and a hypothesis?
- Aim: general statement of purpose
- e.g., to test a theory / relationship between variables
- Hypothesis: testable prediction …
- …of a difference or correlation between variables
Explain the difference between directional and non- directional hypotheses (2). Identify when each is used
- Directional: direction of difference / correlation specified, e.g., ‘more than’
- When a theory / previous research suggests a specific direction
- Non-directional: just ‘a’ difference predicted, but not which direction
- When there is no previous research or previous research is contradictory
Explain what is involved in an experiment (3) and what is the purpose of doing an experiment (1)?
- Researcher manipulates an independent variable (IV)
- …measures a dependent variable (DV) and …
- …controls extraneous variables
- To establish a causal relationship between variables
Explain what is meant by the term ‘operationalisation’
- Specifying precisely how…
- … the IV is manipulated and
- …how the DV is measured
(or, for correlations, how co-variables are measured)
Identify what is wrong with this hypothesis (1):
‘Memory is better with immediate than delayed recall’
Rewrite it to rectify the flaws
- It is poor as hypotheses should incorporate operationalised variables
- e.g. ‘More words will be correctly recalled if recall occurs immediately after learning than after a (e.g) a 30 second delay.’
- IV identifiable: delay v no delay
- DV identifiable: number of words recalled
- Direction explicit: ‘more’ words
What are standardised instructions (2) and how do they relate to investigator effects (2)?
- Instructions which are read out to participants…
- …telling them exactly what to do
- They partially control investigator effects…
- …as experimenter is not free to say different things to different ppts.
What are extraneous variables? (1) Identify two types of extraneous variables, giving an example of each (2x2)
- Variables which, if not controlled, might affect the DV
- Situational
- e.g. noise, time of day
- Participant
- e.g. age, intelligence
Track progress
1 / 5
- Variables which, if not controlled, might affect the DV
- Situational
- e.g. noise, time of day
- Participant
- e.g. age, intelligence
What are confounding variable (CV) and what is the relationship between extraneous and confounding variables (CV)?
- A CV is an EV which has not been controlled…
- … and which has actually affected the DV
- So an EV is a variable which might become a CV
What are demand characteristics and their possible effects?
- Clues revealing the study’s purpose
- Ppts may then display participant reactivity, e.g. try to
- Do what they think is expected (‘please you’) OR
- Do the opposite (‘screw you’)
What are investigator effects?
- Any effect of the investigator’s behaviour on the research outcome
- Any effect of the investigator’s behaviour on the research outcome
Explain the difference between controlled and naturalistic observations
Controlled
- A structured / designed situation
Naturalistic
- In setting in which behaviour would normally occur
Explain the difference between covert and overt observations
Covert
- Watching participants without their knowledge & consent
- Observer is hidden / not visible
Overt
- Watching participants with their knowledge & consent
- Observer is visible / not hidden
Explain the difference between participant and non- participant observations
Participant
- Researcher becomes part of the group and interacts with the participants
Non-participant
- Researcher stays separate from the participants
Explain the key opposing strength and limitation of naturalistic observations and controlled observations
Naturalistic
- Higher ecological validity
- i.e. can generalise findings to the real world …
- …but less control
Controlled
- More control over the situation…
… e.g., the set- up
…but lower ecological validity
Explain the key opposing strength and limitation of covert and overt observations
Covert
- Removes ppt reactivity…
- …all behaviour is natural, increasing validity…
- …but is less ethical as pps do not give consent
Overt
- More ethical as pps give informed consent…
- …but increases ppt reactivity as they are aware of being observed
Explain the key opposing strength and limitation of participant and non- participant observations
Participant
- Researcher experiences situation as participant does, increasing insight and validity…
- …but may get too immersed in it and lose objectivity
Non participant
- Allows researcher to stay objective…
- …but lacks immersion in the situation
Explain the three key features of an experiment
- Researcher manipulates an independent variable (IV) (or it changes / differs somehow)
- Researcher measures effect of this on dependent variable (DV)
- Control over extraneous variables
Explain how both field and natural experiments differ from a laboratory experiment (2) and how field experiments differ from natural experiments
- Field and natural experiments are carried out in the real world …
- …rather than in a controlled setting.
- Field experiments involve manipulation of an IV…
- …while in natural experiments they are due to events
Explain how natural experiments differ from quasi- experiments
- Natural: IV varies due to an event
- Quasi: IV varies because of a group difference
Explain why quasi- experiments are unusual compared to the other types of experiment (
- No change in an IV: pre- existing difference
- No specified location: can take place anywhere
(Seems to include studies that are not really experiments)
Compare lab, field and natural experiments in terms of ability to control extraneous variables (2) Justify your sequencing
- Lab > field > natural
- Due to decreasing control over events during the experiment
- Can control variables in lab
- Some control, but too much going on and many unexpected events in field
- No control at all in natural
Compare lab, field and natural experiments in terms of likelihood of demand characteristics (2) Justify your sequencing
- Lab > field and natural
- Due to pps knowing they are in an experiment
- Lab: always know they are in experiment
- Field: usually don’t know, but may suspect or situation may be unusual
- Natural: don’t know, and nothing manipulated so likely to feel normal
Compare lab, field and natural experiments in terms of ecological validity (2) Justify your sequencing
- Natural > field > lab
- Due to greater generalisability to real- life situations
- Natural is real- life
- Field is where behaviour usually occurs
- Lab is artificial situation
Compare lab, field and natural experiments in terms of population validity
- Depends
- Lab can actively recruit representative samples…
- …but rarely do…
- and even then but pps have to volunteer
- Field and natural can measure behaviour in pps who would not normally volunteer to take part in lab studies
Identify what quasi- experiments CAN establish about group differences, and what they CANNOT establish
That there are group differences
- …but not why
Compare lab, field and natural experiments in terms of possibility of obtaining informed consent from participants
Lab
- Easy …
- …as pps are recruited for study
Field
- Unlikely…
- …as pps are usually unaware they are in experiment
Natural
- Depends…
- … on whether pps are recruited or if data is collected without their knowledge
Explain what is meant by informed consent in psychological research (3)
Explain the most common way of dealing with informed consent (
- Involves making ppts aware of any aspect of a study that would affect their willingness to participate
- e.g., the aims, its procedures, their rights and what their data will be used for
- Ppts can then make an informed judgement about whether they would like to take part.
- Ppts should be issued with a consent letter …
- …detailing all relevant information that might affect their decision to participate.
- This is then signed by the participant (if old enough to understand) and parent (if the ppt. is under 16)
Explain what is involved in obtaining presumptive consent (2)
Explain two limitations of obtaining consent in this way
- Asking other people who could have taken part in the research…
- … to decide whether the deception / stress is justified
- Cannot be presumed to be representative of the population
- Not actually going to take part, so less concerned about ethics of study
Explain what is meant by prior general consent (2)
Explain one limitation of obtaining prior general consent
- Getting permission to deceive a pp
- Usually consent is obtained as part of being involved in a number of experiments, e.g., as part of a course
- Pps may be wary knowing there is a possibility that each experiment is ‘the one with the deception / stress’
- Affecting behaviour in all experiments
Explain what is meant by retrospective consent (1)
Explain one limitation of obtaining retrospective consent
Obtain consent after the study for use of data
- Not really consent…
- …just right to withdraw data
Explain what is meant by ‘deception’ in research.(2)
Explain how psychologists can deal with issues of deception
- Deliberately misleading pps during study…
- …or being misleading by withholding information
- Acceptable only if there is a ‘strong scientific or medical justification’ for deception
- In which case, at the end of the study, give ppts. a full debrief to make them aware of the true aims.*
- This debrief includes asking for retrospective consent. / giving right to withdraw data
Explain what is meant by ‘protection from harm’ in research. (2)
Explain how psychologists can deal with issues of protection
- Participants should not be placed at risk of physical or psychological harm
- Study should be no more stressful than everyday life
- If participants have been subject to stress, the researcher should provide counselling, if they require it
- Debriefing is not an acceptable way of ‘dealing with’ protection
Explain what is meant by ‘privacy and confidentiality’ in research (2)
Explain how psychologists can deal with issues of privacy and confidentiality
- Pps have right to control information about them
- Others should not know (or be able to work out) identity / behaviour of pps
- Anonymity actively maintained in databases
- Researchers usually do not publish names
Explain what is meant by ‘right to withdrawal’ in research (2)
Explain how psychologists can deal with issues of right to withdrawal
- Pps have the right to cease to participate in a study…
*…at any point and without giving a reason
- This should be explained at the outset
- Pps should also have option to withdraw data at end
Explain when it is ethically acceptable not to obtain any consent from participants
- Acceptable if they could normally expect to be observed in the situation
- …i.e., it is in a public place
- e.g., in (some) covert observations / field experiments
Identify the organisation which produces ethical guidelines for psychologists in the UK
British Psychological Society (BPS)