Research Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Chi Squared

A
  • tests a difference or association
  • independent data
  • nominal data
    Degrees of freedom- (no. rows - 2) x (no. columns - 1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pearsons R

A
  • parametric
  • correlation
  • related/ repeated measures
  • interval data
    Df= N-2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Spearmans Rho

A
  • correlational
  • non parametric
  • repeated measures/ related data
  • ordinal data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unrelated T Test

A
  • independent groups
  • tests a difference
  • interval data
    Df= total no. people - 2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Related T test

A
  • repeated design
  • interval data
  • tests a difference
    Df= total no. people - 1
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Wilcoxon T Test

A
  • ordinal data
  • non parametric
  • repeated measures/related data
  • tests a difference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mann Whitney Test

A
  • non parametric
  • tests a difference
  • independent groups
  • ordinal data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Content analysis

A
Structured observation to make qualitative data quantitative by counting themes.
\+ good ethics
\+ high ecological validity
\+ can operationalise
\+ easier to compare numbers 
\+ can replicate
- observer bias
- have to train observers
- reduces complex processes to pre-determined ideas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Time sampling

A

Observations at regular intervals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Event sampling

A

Tally each time a behaviour occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Features of science

A
Empiricism
Objectivity
Replicability
Theory construction 
Hypothesis testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Type 1 error

A

False positive

Accept hypothesis as significant when its not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Type 2 error

A

False negative

Reject hypothesis, accept null hypothesis when its significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The scientific process

A
Induction
Deduction
Hypothetico deductive method
Falsification
Kuhn's paradigms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Induction

A

Development of general theories based pn what you see. Reason from particular to general.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Deduction

A

Start with a theory and look to confirm this.

General to particular.

17
Q

Hypothetico deductive methods

A

Proposed by Karl Popper (1935): theories first then generate expectations/hypotheses which can be falsified

18
Q

Falsification

A

One observation that disproves the theory.

E.g. All flamingoes are pink/one white in disproves theory.

19
Q

Kuhn’s Paradigms

A

Theories people believe.
E.g. World is flat.

  1. Normal science
  2. People question dominant paradigm
  3. Evidence
  4. Paradigm shift
20
Q

Inferential statistics

A

Allow us to draw conclusions from the data, about the significance of the results.

21
Q

Descriptive statistics

A
  • measures of central tendency
  • graphs
  • summary of data
22
Q

Probability

A

Chance of any difference occuring.

Total no. outcomes x happens
/
Total no. of possible outcomes

23
Q

Significance

A

How sure we are that any difference/correlation is meaningful (not down to chance).

24
Q

Correlation

A

Correlation coefficient shows direction:
-1 = perfect negative correlation
+1 = perfect positive correlation

Correlation coefficient shows strength:
0= weak
1= strong

25
Q

Sections of a scientific report

A
Abstract
Introduction
Method 
Results
Discussion summary: summary of findings, relationship to previous research, limitations and wider implications are considered
References