Research Methods Flashcards
DV
Variable we measure
IV
Variable we manipulate
Operationalisation
Define variables specifying set of operations/behaviour measured or manipulated
Hypothesis
Precise and testable statement (prediction)
Aim
Investigator intends to find out in study
Standardise procedures
Procedure same for all pps and can be repeated
EV
Difficult to detect significant effect on DV
Directional hypothesis
State difference of the condition/groups of study
People who do HW with tv on WILL PRODUCE worse results than those who have it off
Non directional hypothesis
Simply state there is a difference between 2 conditions/groups
People who do HW with the tv on PRODUCE DIFFERENT results than one with it off
Confounding variables
Varies systematically with IV and changed DV effect the cause and effect relationship
pps variables
Characteristics of the pp effect the DV e.g motivation gender experience
Situational variables
Research influence pps behaviour e.g order effects
Mundane realism
Study mirror the real world
Generalisation
Apply result beyond research and results e.g setting group
Validity
True/legitimate explanation
Internal validity
Control and realism within study itself
IV DV EV CV
External validity
Generalisability beyond study
Ecological validity
Generalise to other situations
Population validity
Don’t generalise to other people
Historical validity
Can’t generalise time period
Demand characteristics
Pps unconsciously given cues help work out aim lead to screw you effect internal validity lowerd
Investigators effects (bias)
Anything investigator does to effect study wasn’t intended e.g interfering with pps
Single blind design
Pps unaware of aim
Double blond design
Experiment and pps unaware of aim unable to give away cues
Lab experiments
Investigate the cause and effect in controlled environment
Strengths of lab experiments
Well controlled minimise Ev increase internal validity
Easily replicated cuz of standardised procedures
Weaknesses of lab experiments
Artificial situation lack mundane realism
Won’t behave naturally - demand characteristics lower ecological validity
Filed experiment
Iv is manipulated in a natural setting
Strengths of field experiment
Less artificial increases mundane realism increase ecological validity
Unaware they in experiment lower demand characteristics
Weaknesses of filed experiments
Less control of ev and cv reduce internal validity
Time consuming/expensive
Can’t be easily replicated lower external validity
Natural experiment
Iv can’t be manipulated directly
Strengths of natural experiment
Allow research iv not manipulated for ethical or practical reasons
Mundane realism increase internal validly
Weakness of natural experiment
Can’t demonstrate casual relationship as Iv not directly manipulated
Quasi experiment
Iv is the characteristic of the pps e.g gender or age
Strengths of quasi experiment
All comparisons with different types of people
Weakness of quasi experiment
Can’t demonstrate casual relationship between Iv because not directly manipulated
Random allocation not possible can’t control cv lower internal validity
Repeated measures design
Take part all condition of study
Independent groups
Take part in 1 condition of the study
Matched pairs
Pps paired from each condition based on variable e.g iq memory ability
Compare pair performance
Weakness of repeated measures
Order effect e.g bordom and practice
Demand characteristics guess aim
Improve repeated measures
Counter balancing
Use a different test but match difficulty
Weakness Independent groups
Participant variables
More pps needed
Improve independent groups
Randomly allocate
Reduce pps variables