Research Methods Flashcards
Primary data
Information collected by sociologists for their own purposes.
Methods of gathering primary data
- Social surveys
- Participant observation
- Focus Groups.
- interviews
Advantage of primary data
- Up to date, (1st hand)
- authentic information -
- high in validity
Disadvantage of primary data
- It time-consuming
- Costly
- Require more labor
- cant make generalization
Secondary data
Second hand data
Examples of secondary data
-
Documents
Advantages - Personal documents such as diaries and letters enable the researcher to get close to the social actor’s reality, giving insight through their richly detailed qualitative data.
- (Interpretivists favour this.)
- Sometimes documents are the only source of information, for example in studying the past.
-They are a cheap source of data, because someone else has already gathered the information. For the same reason, using existing documents saves the sociologist time.
Official statistics
Advantage of secondary data
- Quick and cheap to use
- alllows you to perform longitudinal data
Disadvantage of secondary data
Resources may not provide the exact information needed
E.G. it’s geographical features
date e.g. diary
Qualitative data
(narrative).
In-depth information usually expressed in words
interpretivist prefer this method.
Unstructured interview are an example of this
Quantitative data
Refers to information in numerical form
Official statistics is an example of this
Methodological perspective
The view of what society is like and how we should study it.
There are two contrasting perspectives of methods
Positivism & interpretivism
Positivists - ( social facts) Durkheim
Believe society shapes the individual
Refers quantitative data e.g. social surveys, structured questionnaires and official statistics because these have good reliability and representativeness.
- They seek to discover patterns of behaviour and seek scientific methods
- cause and effect
- High in reliability
Interpretivist - (Verstehen) - Weber
- Think of Verstehen of staying in someone else’s shoes
- Prefer qualitative data, using methods such as unstructured interviews or participant observation
- They seek to understand people motives and feelings =undrstand in an emphathetic way
- High in validity
How interpretivists and positivist differ
Positivists
* believe society shapes an individual = we can discover facts in a completely objective way
* systematic, scientific methods.
While, Interpretivists believe
* that individual shape society
* objectivity is impossible, we must value subjectivity (opinions) = as individuals are intricate / complex
Experiments
- They try to discover cause-and-effect relationships.
- They aim to measure the effect that an independent variable (the ‘cause’) has a dependent variable (‘the effect’)
Laboratory experiments
Takes place in a controlled environment. Used to discover cause & effect’ relationship.
strength:
* Control – lab experiments have a high degree of control over the environment & other extraneous variables which means that the researcher can accurately assess the effects
* Have a narrow focus - only examine one specofic aspects of teacher expectations, such as body language for example.
* Reliablity - Replicable – due to the researcher’s high levels of control, research procedures can be repeated.
Two groups of the laboratory experiments
The experimental group
The control group
The experimental group
The group under study in the investigation.
The control group
The group which is similar to the study group who are held constant
problems of the laboratory experiments
- Practical problems:Very complex and impossible to control all variables that might exert an influence around us e.g. e.g. the seating lay-outs within classes, the length of lessons/ number of lessons in a weeks, Wider school policies on uniform, discipline and punishment
- lack ecological validty = this is when the study findings of the experiment can be generalised and applied to real-life settings.= creates the Hawthorne effect - as its not done in natural environment (people will behave differenlty because they know thatt hey are being studied)
- Tends to study a small sample, - difficult to investigate social phenomenon like religion - lacks representativeness, aslo cannot study the past
- ETHICAL PROBLEMS: informed consent - may be difficult to obtain from groups such as children or people with learning diffiulties who may be unable to understand the nature and purpose of the experiment.
- Instead we shoould use field experiements and the comparative methods as alternatives (Durkehim study of suicideis an example of this.)
Using experiments to investigate education
Example
May use experiments to study issues such as:
Teacher expectations
Labelling
The self fulfilling prophecy
Teacher expectations:
- Some teachers have preconceived ideas about pupil’s
- Teachers based their ratings on the similarities they perceived between the children in the photographs and pupils they had taught. This study indicates that teachers label pupils from different social classes and use these labels to pre-judge pupils’ potential.
Ethical problems
Young people’s vulnerability and their more limited ability to understand what is happening mean that there are greater problems of deception, lack of informed consent and psychological damage. These ethical concerns are a major reason why laboratory experiments play only a limited role in educational research.
Field experiments
- takes place in subjects natural surrounding= The results are more likely to reflect real-life compared to laboratory research = high in ecological validity.
- not aware that they are subjects of an experiemnt, less likelihood of the hawthorne effect influencing the participant’s behaviour increasing the validity of the findings.
- It is an appropriate research design when researching on a large scale that can’t be carried out in artificial settings.
- establish causal relationships because researchers manipulate a variable and measure its effect
- However issues of inform consent = unethical.
- the comparative methods as alternatives (Durkehim study of suicideis an example of this.)
- rosenthal and jacobsen
limitations of feild experiments
- It is difficult to replicate the research, making it hard to determine the results’ reliability.
- This experimental method has a high chance of collecting a biased sample, making it difficult to generalise the results.
- It may not be easy to record data accurately with so many variables present. Overall, field experiments have less control.
- Potential ethical issues of field experiments include: difficulty getting informed consent, and the researcher may need to deceive participants.
MIC
Lab Experiments and teacher expectations
- Teachers may have preconcvied ideas about pupils of different social classes
- supports the Self Fulfilling Prophecy Theory
case study
milgram - obedience study
lab experiment
study: when pressured by an authority figure of people, shock another person with dangerous levels of electricity. = the willingness of individuals to follow the orders of authorities when those orders conflict with the individual’s own moral judgment.
- links to ehical issues
- Deception: lied about the purpoe of the experiemnt
- physical ans psychological harm
- it demonstrated power of authority and how it can have an influence on people to behave unethically and against their wishes.
comparative
- This method can be used study past events.
- involves comparing two or more similar societies/groups which are similar in some aspects but varied in others, and looking for correlations.
sampling
involves selecting the people you will carry out the research with/on
sample frame
|_|
a list of the members of the population (e.g. school register/postcode list)
random sampling
the simplest technique, where the sample is selected purely by chance. (e.g. names maybe selected randomly in a hat)
Quota sampling
)-(
researchers sample individuals that represent a population according to specific traits or qualities.