Research Design Flashcards

1
Q

misra er al (2013)

A

conducted a cross sectional survey design which recruited patients and the dentist who provided treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

patients and dentists were asked (4)

A

general issues discussed
specific info given about oral health
what procedures were performed
further actions planned and agreed to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who recalled more info? dentists or patients

A

dentists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

dentists recalled giving more (2)

A

dental health education than patients remembered

discussing more future actions that patients remembered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

technical aspects (crowns/bridges) of the encounter were more often reported by both dentist and patient than were

A

psychological issues (pain/embarrassment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

both indicated higher levels of — discussion, than dental health education or agreed future actions

A

procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

there was no relationship found between patient really and

A

satisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

conclusions

A

dentist recall may be higher due to their control over the consultation structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

research

A

results from individual studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evidence

A

cumulative results across studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the synthesis of all valid research studies that answer a specific question?

A

evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does evidence-based practice involve?

A

tracking down the available evidence, assessing validity, and using the best evidence to inform treatment decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

in addition to a significant literature on a topic, clinicians must also consider (3)

A

clinical circumstances
experience and professional judgement
patient’s values and preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

validity

A

“closeness to the truth”
the degree to which the design and method provide for accurate investigation of event in question
as research reviewers you have the opportunity to asses both internal and external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

examples of threats to internal validity (3)

A

selection bias
maturation
instrumentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

— — to groups addresses many threats to internal validity, but not all

A

random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

external validity is the ability to generalize findings: (3)

A

beyond the subjects in the study
beyond the environmental constraints of the current study
to other temporal periods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

as controls increase (increasing internal validity) the generalizability of findings may

A

suffer (decreasing external validity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

types of research bias (2)

A

systematic error that causes a preference for one outcome over another
problematic or incomplete controls that result in skewed observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

pretrial bias (2)

A

selection bias

channeling bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

selection bias

A

procedure for selection of participants is different across groups

22
Q

channeling bias

A

placing participants in study conditions according to prognosis, age, fragility, etc

23
Q

interviewer bias

A

error introduced by researcher collecting data

24
Q

chronology bias

A

historic control subject to changes in practice

25
recall bias
skewed or faulty recollection of events/associations
26
transfer bias
differential attrition across conditions
27
misclassification bias
problems with operational definition of grouping variables
28
performance bias
differences in clinical quality of intervention across providers
29
citation bias
comparative evidence limited by what is accessible
30
publication bias
previous evidence not available due to publication preferences
31
confounding bias
observed association due to some unknown variable
32
quantitative inquiry rooted in empiricism
only those phenomena which can be measured are "real" | measures are often numeric scales
33
qualitative inquiry based in hermeneutics
the interpretation of contextual meaning | measures are subjective and dependent upon perceptual biases
34
evidence hierarchy (strongest to weakest) (6)
``` systematic reviews and meta-analyses randomized controlled trials cohort studies case control studies cross sectional studies case reports ```
35
experimental research is a type of --- inquiry
quantitative
36
experimental research investigates
"cause"
37
experimental research
studies in which the researcher controls or manipulates the variables under investigation
38
observational research may be either
quantitative or qualitative
39
observational research without experimental
controls (may include comparison to natural groups)
40
observational research is sometimes called
"quasi experimental"
41
observational research
designs provide for investigation of relationships, but not cause
42
variable
any factor relevant to a particular study | may be known or unknown
43
examples of variables (4)
age ethnicity socioeconomic status disease history
44
independent variable
a factor or condition that changes naturally or is intentionally manipulated (ex. grouping variable) by the investigator to observe the effect - known and controlled by the experimenter - "causative factor"
45
dependent variable
an observed variable in an experiment or study for which changes are determined by the level of one or more independent variables - a factor directly affected by another - "response" or "outcome"
46
confounding variable
statistically, an extraneous variable that correlates significantly with both the dependent variable and the independent variable a factor not considered or recognized (unmeasured) by the researcher that has significant impact on the dependent variable or outcome of interest -"confounding influences" or "error"
47
prospective research looks as
events that have not yet happened or constructs that have not yet been measured
48
retrospective research looks at
data that already exists
49
what is the strongest evidence for demonstrating cause and effect?
randomized control trial
50
why do we do random assignment?
it reduces the effect of bias due to intervening variables | -assumes that confounding conditions will be equally distributed across groups
51
appraising a study: what to look for (6)
``` who were the participants? how were they assigned to groups? what were the study conditions? hypotheses? assessment of intervention? how were the data analyzed? ```