Research Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Cognitive Experiment types Lab and field

A

Lab- special environment, variables tightly controlled, Iv directly manipulated by researcher and other variables controlled, ppt can randomly be allocated to control or experimental conditions, ppt aware they’re taking part in study but may not knownajm overt

Field- natural environment, Iv deliberately manipulated and dv measured but not as highly controlled, higher effect of extraneous variables, covert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lab experiment eval

A

High levels of control
high replicability

lacks egological validity
artificial
higher chance of ppt effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Field experiment evaluation

A

Cause and effect
high levels of ecological validity
less demand characteristics

less control over extraneous
more time consuming
random allocations to conditions are difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define Repeated measures and independent measures

matched pair

A

same ppt in each condition

different ppt in each condition

different ppt but are matched on age gender sex iq

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are order effects

A

practice effect- do better as they know what to do in second condition
fatigue - do worse because they are tired in second condition
repeated measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Counterbalancing

A

deals with order effects

sample divided in half , one half completes condition in one order and the others in the reverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are situational variable and ppt variable , experimenter effects and demand characteristic

A

connected w research situation for example temp, time of day, materials

characteristic of individual affecting findings
age intelligence motivation gender experience

interpret things to favour argument, may influence answers, presence of observer in naturalistic observational studies

ppt guess aim and try act accordingly
act nervous, social desirability, guess purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How to counter experimental variables

A

situational- standardised procedures and same instructions
ppt variable- matched pair design
demand- a single blind procedure ( don’t know hypothesis or procedure)
investigated- double blind ( ppt and researcher don’t know hypothesis and procedure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reliability

A

two or more measurements consistent w eachother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

validity

A

whether study measures behaviour it intends to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

construct validity

A

degree to which test or instrument is capable of measuring the aim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is nominal data

A

data forms discrete categories like hair colour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ordinal data

A

measurement where numbers are ranking rather than scores

attractiveness from 1-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

interval/ratio data

A

individual score for each ppt is gathered and score can be identified using scale with equal distances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

open ended q eval

A

difficult to analyse qualitative so could be subjective and interpreted differently
don’t not restrict range of available answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

close ended q

A

limits answered

quantitive data

17
Q

Correlation strength

A

relationship between two variables
indicates strength and direction of relation in expression of correlation coefficient

allows researchers to statistically analyse situations that could not be manipulated ethically or for practical reasons
allowing researchers to unravel complex relationships.

18
Q

Correlation weaknessss

A

do not establish cause and effect only relationship

non linear relationships cannot be measured

19
Q

predictive validity

A

extent to which results and conclusions can predict real life

20
Q

internal vs external validity

A

internal
whether results obtained are effected by variable being manipulated in cause and effect relationship
(IV)
External
extent to which results can be generalised to other settings

21
Q

Adoption study

A