reproductive and endocrine Flashcards
mastitis
Inflammation of the mammary gland
Although most of the time when we refer to mastitis we are thinking of bacterial infections of the gland, technically it is simply inflammation of the mammary tissue. This has particular relevance when we think about treatments as although historically the mainstay of treatment has been antimicrobials, with growing consideration of antimicrobial resistance there is greater reflection on other causes of inflammation (eg trauma).
Whilst we most commonly talk about acute mastitis in dairy cows due its prevalence and economic significance, mastitis and its treatment is of significance in most farmed species. Although much of this lecture will centre on dairy cows the principles of treatment and control are relevant to all species even if specific products/options may vary
mastitis treatment
Antimicrobials-
Intramammary
Parenteral
Anti inflammatories-
NSAIDs
Steroids
Nursing
Supportive therapies- ketosis ect
Alternative treatments- not ususally effective but prevelant
NSAIDs for mastitis
NSAIDS have a number of important properties which are beneficial in the treatment of mastitis. First and foremost mastitis is widely acknowledged to be a painful condition. A number of studies have demonstrated physiological and behavioural changes associated with mastitis. Whilst the use of anti inflammatory medicines to control endotoxaemia in severe case of mastitis has been practiced for decades, in recent years there has been growing understanding of their important role in less severe cases. Even relatively mild cases of mastitis result in gait changes with cows increasing the distance between their hocks to avoid contact with the udder. Various pharmaceutical studies have shown the benefits of NSAIDs in reducing udder inflammation as part of the treatment of mastitis. As with other clinical conditions this kind of symptomatic relief is critical to support the animals general health leading to a reduction in the chance of culling
Corticosteroids for mastitis
QUESTIONABLE
Parenteral
Local
Whilst corticosteroids also provide potent anti inflammatory properties, they convey less analgesia than NSAIDs which may limit their benefits in promoting appetite. When administered systemically they also convey immunosuppressive properties which may be deleterious to the animal’s own abilities to fight the infection. As such they are best avoided as a treatment for mastitis.
Some intramammary mastitis treatments contain steroids for local administration. Whilst there is some evidence that these can have a positive effect, reducing udder inflammation and potentially promoting distribution of the medicine in the gland, there is a lack of evidence to suggest that this enhances cure rates. There is also the possibility that these impacts may mask signs leading to cessation of treatment before bacteria have been fully eliminated
antimicrobials for mastitis
Antimicrobials have formed the bedrock of mastitis therapy for over 60y years but as with all uses of antimicrobials this use is increasingly scrutinised in light of growing AMR concerns. Many studies over the years have demonstrated the benefit of antimicrobial on undifferentiated cases but there can be major differences between pathogens. Results from microbial cultures of mastitis cases frequently demonstrate a significant number of no growths some of which will be the result of infections that have already been eliminated by the cows immune system or other causes of inflammation (eg trauma). There is also a significant body of evidence that most gram negative infections, particularly E.coli, will self sure without the use of antimicrobials. As such there is a growing trend toward the use of rapid on farm diagnostics to identify gram +ve cases allowing a more targeted approach to therapy.
culling in mastitis cases
Despite treatment some infections will fail to cure and become chronic. These infections have a very poor chance of cure generally. Not only does treating these infections represent a poor return on investment and use of antimicrobials, these animals also act as a reservoir for infection for other animals in the herd. Culling is an important part of mastitis prevention and should not be ignored as a consideration when considering treatment options
classification of mastitis cases
Mild- changes in milk only- localised therapy
Moderate- inflamation of udder- non steriodals
Severe- systemic signs- pyrexia ect
Chronic/recurrent- intensive therapy or culling
When considering treatment options for a clinical mastitis case it’s important to consider what we are trying to achieve. This ay vary between species, and clinical scenarios, In some case (eg gangrenous mastits, summer mastitis) our principle focus may simply managing the health of the animal as the gland itself is too severely affected for a realistic chance of cure. It’s common to categorise mastitis cases with differing treatment strategies deployed for different severities
Parenteral antibiosis for mastitis
Whilst commonly antibiosis of mastitis cases is done through local intramammary formulations, on some occasions systemic antimicrobials may be considered. Historically there have been two rationales put forward for the use of injectable antimicrobials in the treatment of mastitis cases.
For many years arguments have been put forward that injectable antimicrobials may enhance deep tissue penetration leading to enhanced cure rates. Although some studies have shown small benefits from the sue of systemic antimicrobials, the evidence is equivocal with others failing to show an improvement. This may relate to differences in pathogens involved but given the prevailing concerns about the use of systemic antimicrobials from an AMR perspective this use is questionable
The other predominant use of systemic therapy is in the treatment of toxic mastitis cases. In this instance the animal is often suffering from bacteraemia due to changes in the blood gut membrane caused by the toxaemia. In these cases parenteral antimicrobials can be useful
practicalities of mastis treatment
Whilst all these principles are important to make the most effective use of the tools we have available to us, it is also important to consider practicalities. In most dairy situations regular repeat treatment and use of intramammary preparations is fairly easy but when dealing with more extensively managed livestock some compromises may need to be considered to ensure treatment compliance
Cascade
Withdrawal periods
Antimicrobial use
Nursing and support of mastitis
Nursing and support shouldn’t be underestimated in the treatment of mastitis. Regularly stripping of affected 1/4s to remove pathjogens and toxin can be highly effective in helping the cow to combat the infection. In more severe infections where cows become recumbent fluids and nutritional support may be vital in preventing the animal deteriorating while treatments take effect
prevention of mastitis
best strategy!
Treat & record clinical cases- Prevention strategies rely on identifying risk factors
Post milking teat disinfection
Dry cow therapy
Cull chronic cases
Milking machine maintenance
Lactating period prevention of mastitis
Whilst there are a number of important aspects to controlling mastitis during the lactating period, the physical act of infection almost always occurs through the teat sphincter around either milking or suckling. Infection is generally the result of an imbalance between exposure and protection so identifying the specific risk factors and either addressing or mitigating them is key. In some cases it may prove difficult to adequately decrease the risk of exposure and in these instances there are options to enhance the animals ability to fight the infection through the use of either vaccines or immunomodulators
Dry period prevention of mastitis
During the dry period the cows key defence mechanism against infection is the keratin tear plug. Unfortunately this teat plug fauils to form in1/4 of teats. There are a number of options available to combat this but the most effective is the use of internal teat sealants to replace the plug preventing pathogens gaining entry to the udder.
insulin tolerance test (ITT)
tests for tissue insulin resistance (factor of laminitis)
measures the ability of tissues to take up glucose (i.e. insulin sensitivity). The glucose concentration of a baseline blood sample is compared to the concentration in a blood sample taken 30 minutes after a dose of insulin is administered. The horse is insulin resistant if the second blood glucose concentration does not decrease to 50% or less of the baseline glucose value.
Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID)
(Equine Cushing’s Disease)
Age related degenerative condition
Loss of dopaminergic inhibition
Hypothalamus unable to regulate pars intermedia of pituitary gland
Hypertrophy / hyperplasia of PI
Increase production of many hormones from PI which have wide array of effects on body
high levels of acth (and cortisol but not so much in horses)
clinical signs-
pot belly
fluffy coat
pupd
skeletal muscle atrophy
abnomal sweating
regional adiposity
fertility issues
insuline disregulation in a third of all cases (lamanitis risk)
suseptability to infection
1/5 horses over 15
Condition of older horses (average age 19yo)
Rarely diagnosed in younger horses (<10yo)
No sex predilection
Ponies more likely to be affected than horses
must be differentaited in lami itis cases from EMS-
seen in older horses
test for by uing basal acth-
acth however has seasonal changes- higher in autumn
breed differences
stressed or ill orses also display higher levels- PAIN FROM LAMINITIS CAN CAUSE THIS
Differentiating PPID and EMS
Both PPID and EMS result in laminitis due to ID. PPID may only serve to exacerbate pre-existing ID
Regardless, PPID remains an important consideration/ rule out in horses with ID
For EMS, ID is the central feature of the condition and may be the only apparent abnormality apart from laminitis or may be present concurrently with obesity.
Differentiating between the two conditions involves ruling in or out PPID in cases of laminitis of suspected endocrine origin.
diagnosis of PPID
basal acth
trh stimulation test for borderline cases- not reliable between july and december- false positives
trh administered and so adh produced and can be measures- offlicence so must be selective
acth test also used to monitor progression/ recovery- allows for finite assesment of management practices as they are often very different for each horse
What are your first line tests for EMS?
risk factors- podgy innactive native pony?
basal insulin- non fasted sample, fasting cuses insulin to drop, feeding also causes artificail rise though
dynamic tests-
oral glucose test
oral sugar karo) test
basal adiponectin test-
cgit/ inaulin tolerance test
basal insulin test
hightly specific- if high, horse at risk for laminitis- had insulin disregulation
can be used a baseline for future tests
easy and convinient
not as sensitive as dynamic tests- imporves with fasting
not if grain fed in last 2-3 hours
good for monitoring isulin during treatment to asses managemtn practices- feeding ect
dynamic insulin test
better than basal for rested horses on box rest ready to go back out to see if ready
glucose or sugar (karo)
blood sample 2 hours or 60-90 mins later (karo) later
cgit/ inaulin tolerance test
rarley used test of insulin disregulation
when should you test for insulin diregulation
laminitis cases
for moitoring of at risk horses
9-year-old Shetland pony
Presents with suspected laminitis
Willing to walk but with a notably shortened stride.
Would you perform endocrine testing in this case and what would you test for and why?
Signalmet points to EMS so test for insulin disregulation- basal insulin
obvios that hteres insulin dysregulation without test but can be starting point for monitoring with dynamic tests
19-year-old Welsh cob X gelding
Presents with suspected laminitis in May
Normal HR, RR and temperature
Constantly shifting weight when stood on the yard and bounding digital pulse in both front feet.
The owner notes that the horse has been late to shed his winter coat this year
Would you perform endocrine testing in this case and what would you test for and why?
signalment points to PPID- basal acth
trh if acth inconclusive/ not maching signalment/ horse stressed
test basal insulin- allows baseline to be known for monitoring