Remedies for Breach of Covenant Flashcards
explain liability in relation to an old lease
LL can sue original T (privity of contract) and current T (privity of estate). They will only be able to sue intervening T’s if they gave a direct covenant on underlease/assignment (privity of contract)
explain liability in relation to an new lease
LL can sue the current T. They will only be able to sue the previous T if they can an AGA on underlease/assignment. Any AGA given by the previous T expires when the current T assigns/underleases
This is because LTA 1995 replaced the rules on privity of contract & estate. Now, a former T is automatically released from liability on assignment/underlease, unless they get an AGA.
what are the considerations when deciding who to sue?
what type of remedy they want i.e. if someone is being sue on the basis they provided an AGA, they couldn’t complete an order for specific performance
who can the LL sue?
- Current T
- Current T’s guarantor
- Former T (NB: dependent on whether it is an old lease or new lease)
- Former T’s guarantor
explain the liability of a former T’s guarantor to an old lease and why they can be sued
G’s liability continues for the duration of the lease (even if the original T assigns the lease to someone else)
explain suing the current T’s guarantor
The guarantee must be in writing
The guarantee will usually provide that G must pay rent/other sums T has failed to and remedy/indemnify LL for loss caused by breach of covenant
explain the liability of a former T’s guarantor to an new lease and why they can be sued
G (and T) is automatically released from liability on assignment unless T is required to enter into an AGA on assignment. Then their G would indirectly guarantee the incoming T until they assign
what must be done before LL can sue a former T/their G?
LL must comply with s17 LTA 1995:
explain the s17 LTA procedure
o LL must serve a default notice on the former T/G.
o This applies to claims for ‘fixed charges’ only i.e. rent, service charges, any amount payable under a covenant for a liquidated sum (NB: if the sum is not a ‘fixed charge’, LL does not need to follow s17.
o Notice must be served within 6m of the breach, otherwise LL will not be able to recover the money from former T/G (in other words, if T is in 1yr of arrears, LL would only be able to recover the last 6m)
NB: LL need not start proceedings in this time, but must serve notice
o This applies to old and new leases.
what does the s17 procedure apply to?
o This applies to claims for ‘fixed charges’ only i.e. rent, service charges, any amount payable under a covenant for a liquidated sum
NB: if the sum is not a ‘fixed charge’, LL does not need to follow s17.
what is the time limit for service of the s17 notice? explain the effect
o Notice must be served within 6m of the breach, otherwise LL will not be able to recover the money from former T/G (in other words, if T is in 1yr of arrears, LL would only be able to recover the last 6m)
NB: LL need not start proceedings in this time, but must serve notice
what can former T/G do if a s17 notice is served?
the former T/G can call for an overriding lease. This is a concurrent lease and makes them the immediate LL of the defaulting T. They could then terminate the lease or exercise remedies available to a LL.
what are the remedies for breach of covenant to pay?
- debt action
- commercial rent arrears recovery
- rent deposit
- forfeiture
re: remedies for breach of covenant to pay
what must always be checked before pursing a remedy?
- Must check there is such covenant and that the payment date has passed
re: remedies for breach of covenant to pay
can LL use more than 1 remedy?
yes
re: remedies for breach of covenant to pay
explain a debt action
- 6 year limitation period applies.
- Can be brought against any of the above.
NB: if pursuing former T/G, LL need not bring the claim within 6m, they just need to serve notice of money owed.