Remedies For Breach Of Contract Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a remedy

A

A remedy is what the court gives to the party who has suffered through non performance of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What remedies are available through bread of contract

A

Damages

Equitable remedies - specific performance or an injunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is discretionary remedy

A

Equitable remedies the court awards if it sees fit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Robinson v Harman

A

Breach of contract was explained that the affected party is to be placed into the position they were in prior to the contract by way of damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Omak maritime ltd v Manila challenger shipping co

A

Court determined the claimant got a better deal as a result of the breach of contract so no damages were awarded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nominal damages

A

Small damages awarded as a result of a breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contemptuous damages

A

Damages awarded on the basis the claim is correct but a waste of time to sue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Two types of pecuniary damages

A

Loss of bargain / expectation loss

Reliance loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cost of replacement meaning (market place rule)

A

Court awards difference between two prices as damages payment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ruxley electronics and construction ltd v Forsyth 1996

A

Pool wasn’t built to correct depth. Claimant tried to sue for recorrection work and new pool. Court awarded “loss of amenity” damages in the breach as they felt rebuilding the pool was unnecessary

LOSS OF ENJOYMENT NON PECUNIARY DAMAGES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chaplin v hicks

A

Claimant was awarded speculative damages as she loss her opportunity to interview for a job due to insufficient notice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Courts comments on McGill v the sports and entertainment media group

A

The key principle is on the hypothetical acts of a third party. Claimant must prove that the defendant acted against the contract for personal gain and establish causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reliance loss anglia television v Reed

A

Actor dropped out last minute of a film. Film company were unable to determine profit therefore a breach was brought forward for the cost of production and preparation until the point of the actor quitting. It was awarded in damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Non-pecuniary damages exceptions

A

The object of the contract is to provide pleasure, relaxation, peace of mind or freedom of distress damages are recoverable.

The breach caused physical inconvenience and discomfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Non- pecuniary damages relaxation

A

Jarvis v swan

Holidayer was awarded damages as their holiday did not perform as suspected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Farley v skinner

A

Pleasure doesn’t need to be the only objective of the contract. Surveyor was obstructed to value a house and provide report on aircraft noise. Surveyor failed to perform this part of the contract and claimant sued.

Pleasure of enjoying the house was affected by the noise of aircraft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Non- pecuniary damages- physically inconvenience

A

Milner v carnival plc

Damages for distress as holiday turned out to be problematic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How to claim damages

A

Claimant must show

Breach of contract
How the breach was caused and explain the loss
The loss isn’t too remote from the breach
That the claimant had mitigated his losses

19
Q

Causation of a breach of contract

A

C&P haulages v Middleton

Claimant fixed equipment into a rented garage. When he left garage tried to claim losses for equipment left. The contract had a honour clause which stated any fixtures put in are to be left. No breach was awarded.

20
Q

Rules established under Hadley v Baxendale remoteness of breach of contract

A

Loss that a reasonable person would have anticipated
Or

Defendant has been specifically warned about the loss by the claimant

21
Q

Hadley v Baxendale

A

Mill owner needed mill fixing. Sent it to be fixed by defendant. Defendant said would return within 24 hours but didn’t. The claimant tried to issue a breach for losses as a result of mill part not being available for 7 days and the losses they incurred for income due to the machine being unable to work. The court deemed the loss not to be recoverable as the defendant was not aware of the potential loss as the claimant didn’t inform him the working off the mill relied upon that one part

22
Q

Victoria laundry v Newman industries

A

Late delivery if a boiler for laundry

Laundry list profits on its business which were recoverable

Potential new client cost was not recoverable as it was not reasonably foreseeable loss

23
Q

The Heron II

A

The shipping company was late in sending the sugar. When it was sold the price of sugar dropped. Difference in price was recoverable due to delay as it was known that sugar prices fluctuated

24
Q

Transfield shipping inc v Mercator shipping inc (reconsidering remoteness)

A

Mercator has been hired a boat from another hire company. The boat arrived 9 days late. Loss under breach was different as each party worked out the loss based on the commercial rate and the market rate of a days hire. Court decided lower figure was to be paid as it was a foreseeable loss.

25
Q

Gives examples where specific performance will not be awarded

A

Where damages would be an adequate remedy

If the court needs to provide constant supervision that the order is being met.

Not available to contract if personal services

If it is subject to mutuality. (Each party is entitled to compelling it the contract)

Party seeking remedy must have conducted himself properly

26
Q

What is specific performance

A

A court order compelling the performance of the contract

27
Q

Example if case where specific performance was granted

A

Posner v Scott Lewis

A appointment of a porter was compelled

28
Q

When will an injunction not be awarded in breach of contract?

A

If damages is sufficient

If it has the effect of forcing the performance of personal services contract

29
Q

3 steps for consumer rights act remedies S19 CRA

A

Short term right to reject within 30 days of ownership

Right to request a replacement or repair

Right to a price reduction or reject goods

30
Q

Is consumer able to recover more than once for the same loss under consumer rights act?

A

No

31
Q

Terms of a 30 day right to reject

A

Time starts once consumer has purchase of the items

Time limit reduces if goods are perishables

Period of 30 days is held if item is being replaced or repaired

32
Q

Time period for refunds under rejected consumer goods

A

14 days

33
Q

S21 rejection of goods terms

A

Consumer may reject all goods supplied

May reject just the faulty goods

Reject some faulty goods and keep some faulty goods

34
Q

S23 repair or replacement terms

A

Trader is required to replace the item of repair within reasonable time

Repair or replace without causing inconvenience to consumer

Best any costs that are incurred

CONSUMER MUST; allow trader reasonable time to repair or replace item before asking to reject contract

35
Q

What time limit is the consumer entitled to post to replacement or repair to reject goods?

A

Remainder of their 30 days or 7 days depending which is longer

36
Q

What section covers service contracts in CRA

A

S54 CRA

37
Q

S55 right to repeat performance remedies?

A

Only applies to situations where initial service wasn’t completed

Trader is required to complete the work again at their own cost

38
Q

S56 right to price reduction remedies

A

Consumer is entitled to a reduction in price if job is not performed as expected

39
Q

Digital content remedies section in CRA

A

S42

40
Q

Digital right to repair s43 remedies

A

Ensure digital content conforms to contract. This could be a software update

Must be completed in reasonable time without causing consumer inconvenience

Trader must bear cost of repair

41
Q

s44 right to reduction remedies digital contract

A

Partial or full refund can be awarded if appropriate

Must be paid within 14 days

42
Q

s45 right to a refund for digital content

A

Rights to a refund are allowed if the trader is selling something he has no right to sell

43
Q

Remedies for damage to a device or digital content s46

A

A free or paid for device / service from the trader which causes damage to a consumers device consumer is entitled to an offer of repair at traders cost or compensation