religious language Flashcards

1
Q

Cognitive sentence.

A

A sentence to which you can ask whether it is true or false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Non-cognitive sentence.

A

A sentence to which you cannot ask if it is true or false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Via negativa/apophatic way.

A

Stating only what God is not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Via positivia/cataphatic way.

A

Stating what God is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

‘The Cloud of Unknowing’.

A

“The first time you seek God, you find only a darkness.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pseudo-Dionysius comment on language.

A

“We must dare not to speak, or to form any conception of the hidden.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

John Scotus Eriugena comment on language.

A

“His light is called darkness because of its excellence, as no creature can comprehend either what or how it is.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Moses Maimonides on the danger of the cataphatic way.

A

Can anthropomorphise God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Aquinas on religious language.

A

The via negativa can act as a prelude to understanding of God but as we are made in his likeness, we can understand and thus speak of God positivley.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

W. R. Inge on via negativa.

A

Risks annihilation of God and God’s link to humans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

G. K. Chesterton and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin on ‘divinisation of matter’.

A

Believed finding God through our material existence was part of His plan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The cataphatic way in the bible.

A

Reference to God as ‘light’, ‘shepard’, ‘Father’, juror, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Theosis.

A

Likeness and union with God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rowan Williams on language.

A

Discussion about God follows and interaction with Him and attempts to discuss a mysterious encounter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Homoites.

A

Aristotle’s term for likeness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Qualified model.

A

Ian Ramsey term for using human language to model something else.

17
Q

Example of the qualified model.

A

Describing God as the First Cause uses ‘cause’ as a model to give understanding that everything comes from God but not in a normal way.

18
Q

Karl Barth on Ian Ramsey’s and analogy.

A

We cannot approach God with language based on our experience but must first have a revelation.

19
Q

Frederick Ferre.

A

Argues value of analogy is providing us with a rule for enabling using theological language about God if we are careful with the way we use language.

20
Q

Theory of homoites.

A

If two things share some sort of attribute, then what will be true for one should be true for the other.

21
Q

Issue of Theory of Homoites.

A

Question as to how much we assume when we make an analogy.

22
Q

Aristotles four ways of making judgements on analogical arguments.

A
  • strengths depends on number of similarities in the two things being compared.
  • similarity exists in only identical relations and properties.
  • good analogy is based on underlying common causes.
  • good analogical arguments don’t need to assume aquaintence with underlying generalisations.
23
Q

Doctrine of Proper Analogy.

A

Tries to deal with the issues surrounding language use in reference to God.

24
Q

Why is Doctrine of Analogy considered ‘proper’.

A

Technical discussion in De Veritate on analogies considered proper.

25
Q

Univocal language.

A

Words with identical meanings in different sentences.

26
Q

Equivocal language.

A

The same words used with different meanings in different sentences.

27
Q

Analogy of Attribution.

A

We can discern something about God from His creation.

28
Q

Analogy of Proportion.

A

From a lesser object, a human, we can say that God has proportionally more of a quality.

29
Q

Who identified the difference between Analogy of Attribution and Analogy of Proportion.

A

Thomas Cajetan.

30
Q

Aquinas’ example for analogy of attribution.

A

Bull’s urine can be determined as healthy or unhealthy, and we can discern if the bull is healthy or unhealthy.

31
Q

Vincent Brummer criticism of analogy.

A

It gives the appearance of saying something significant about God, but we remain as ignorant as we were before.

32
Q

Sign.

A

Something which points to something else by convention.

33
Q

Symbol.

A

Something which participates in that to which it points.

34
Q

Issues with Tillich’s concept of symbol.

A
  • different levels of participation.
  • how do we know if symbol use is appropriate.
35
Q

What Paul Tillich calls God.

A

“Ground of being.”

36
Q

John Herman Randall Jr’s non-cognitive analysis on symbol.

A

Religious symbols are non-cognitive and non-representative so it is inappropriate to ask if they are true or not.

37
Q

John Herman Randall Jr on religion.

A

Argues religion is a human activity which contributes to human culture.

38
Q

John Herman Randall Jr on God.

A

God is our ideals, another part of our psyche, which is divine and moving.