religious language Flashcards
via negativa ( apophatic way )
that since we cant understand god, the only meaningful way to talk about god is to say what god is not
via positive ( cataphatic way )
only meaningful way to speak about god is to be positive through analogy etc
pseudo-dionyisus on via negitiva
positive language limits god that’s why it can only be negative language eg god is not evil
tilich on symbols
it trys to connect minds to god not explain
maimodenies example
the ship, you can say its not a circle etc
brian davies on negative language
only allows to gain knowledge in “special cases” most cases including god is not that
Aquinas believes
you can speak about god in positive terms if we speak analogically
aqunias analogy of attribution
we can attribute qualities to the creator of a thing that are analogous to those of its creation
uses the healthy bull urine, we can then assume that the bull is healthy
so similarly humans have qualities like power and love so we can assume our creator did too
aqunias analogy of proportion
a being has a quality in a degree relative to its being a virus have a life, plant have a life, humans have life, god has live
so god is like us but proportionally greater
univocal language
words only have one meaning
equivocal language
different meanings for different people
genesis quote
we are made in gods “image and likness”
what does karl barth think the theory does
puts too much pressure on reason
brummer on gods nature
we dont know gods nature so we cannot know the way in which god is loving
tillich on symbol
most religious language has symbolic meaning rather than literal