Relevance Flashcards
Rule 403 - Evidence is excluded if probative value is _________ outweighed by: (5 things)
“substantially outweighed” … unfair prejudice,
confusing the issues,
misleading the jury,
undue delay, wasting time, or
needlessly presenting cumulative evidence
When is character evidence (of any kind) admissible as substantive evidence in a civil case?
404’s default rule - IT’S NOT.
EXCEPTIONS:
(1) Under Rule 405(b), character evidence is admissible IF CHARACTER IS IN ISSUE.
(2) Past sex offenses, Rule 415
If character is in issue in a civil trial, what kind of character evidence is admissible as substantive evidence?
All three - reputation, opinion, specific acts
What are the three exceptions under which character evidence is admissible as substantive evidence in a criminal case?
(A) Defendant opens the door
(B) Defendant offers character evidence of an alleged victim’s pertinent trait
(C) In a homicide case, prosecution may offer evidence of victim’s trait of peacefulness
When are specific acts admissible as substantive evidence in a civil case?
ONLY IF:
(1) To show something other than character under 404(b) (motive,opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, lack of accident)
(2) Character is in issue — which is basically never. Character is in issue in the following kinds of claims, but not much more:
Defamation/Libel
Child custody
Entrapment
Negligent entrustment
*The evidence must go to the pertinent character trait in issue (e.g. Evidence of smoking and drinking is inadmissible in a libel suit re corruption and accepting bribes)
(3) The specific acts are past instances of sexual assault or child molestation. Rule 415.
When are prior specific acts admissible as substantive evidence in a criminal case?
(1) To prove something other than character: If it’s a crime, wrong, or other act, prosecutor or defense can offer to show motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident IF notice before trial. Rule 404(b)
(2) Defendant can offer specific acts if character is in issue. Rule 405
(3) Prosector can inquire about specific acts on cross-examination of the defendant’s character witness. Rule 405
What are some examples of causes of action in which character would be an issue?
Defamation
Child custody
Entrapment
Negligent entrustment
May evidence of a habit or routine practice be admitted to show conformity?
Yes. Rule 406
Does habit evidence have to be corroborated?
No. Rule 406. Even if habit evidence is the only evidence that the person or organization behaved a certain way in this case, that’s fine—don’t need any corroborating evidence.
When may subsequent remedial measures be admitted as substantive evidence?
ONLY for: impeachment or—if disputed—proving ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures
May evidence of a subsequent remedial measure be admitted if it was compelled (e.g., a government-mandated recall)? Why?
Yes, because this negates concerns that the party would have hesitated to take the measure for fear that it would come up later as evidence against them
When may evidence of communications during settlement negotiations be admitted as substantive evidence?
For “another purpose, such as”:
(1) Witness’s bias or prejudice
(2) Negating a contention of undue delay
(3) Proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution”
Rule 408 is very broad, but don’t forget about these exceptions. Note that impeachment is NOT included—it’s specifically excluded in the chapeau.
Also remember that statements during criminal plea negotiations aren’t as broadly protected. Rule 410.
May evidence of communications during settlement negotiations be admitted for impeachment purposes?
No. Rule 408.
Does a lawsuit have to be filed for the protection of negotiations to kick in?
(not sure)
May admissions of guilt be admitted against a party, if made in conjunction with an offer to pay medical bills?
Yes. This is different from settlement negotiations.