Relationships : Investment Model Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Rusbult’s Investment Model of Commitment

A

Rusbult’s Investment Model is a theory of romantic relationships that was developed to explain why some people might remain in a relationship while others might not. It is based on four factors : satisfaction , investment , comparison with alternatives , and commitment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Satisfaction

A

Satisfaction is one of the factors included in Rusbult’s Investment Model of commitment. It refers to the positive versus negative emo4ons experienced within a relationship and how much one partner salsifies another partner’s needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Comparison with Alternatives

A

Comparison with alternatives is part of Rusbult’s Investment Model of relationships. Rusbult proposed that if there is a more attractive alternative (e.g. being alone or with another possible partner), then an individual might end their current relationship. However, if a beJer alternative is not available, then they may remain in their current relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Investment

A

Investment refers to anything that a person has put into a relationship that would be lost if they lep the relationship. This can include possessions, children, time and even emotional energy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who made the investment model?

A

The Investment Model was put forward by Rusbult et al. (2001), as a development of Social Exchange Theory. The rationale for developing SET further was that many couples stay together despite the costs outweighing the rewards, so there must be some other factors that keep them together. Rusbult’s Investment Model investigates what these other factors might be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are major factors that maintain commitment in a relationship?

A

According to Rusbult’s proposal, there are three major factors that maintain commitment in relationships: satisfaction level, comparison with alternatives and investment size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What satisfaction level and comparison?

A
  • Satisfaction level and comparison with alternatives are based on the idea of comparison levels from Social Exchange Theory. People will have a high level of satisfaction with relationships if they have more rewards (companionship, attention, emotional support) and fewer costs (arguments, time).

-They also tend to be committed to relationships if, when asking themselves, ‘Is there a better alternative to satisfy my needs?’ the answer is ‘no’. Alternatives can include staying on their own and not engaging in romantic relationships at all, as well as finding a new partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the most important factor that maintains commitment in a relationship?

A

the most important factor that maintains commitment to a relationship is investment. Investment refers to the number of resources, both tangible, like money or possessions, and intangible, like happy memories, that people will lose if they leave relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an Intrinsic investment ?

A

Intrinsic investment comprises the things we put directly into the relationship, such as effort, money, possessions, self-disclosure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an Extrinsic investment ?

A

Extrinsic investment refers to the things that are brought to people’s life through the relationships, such as children, friends and shared memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Rusbult et al conclude?

A

Because both intrinsic and extrinsic investments can potentially be lost if relationships end, Rusbult et al. concluded that the bigger the investment, the more likely people are to stay in relationships. Therefore, it is the investment size that influences commitment to relationships, rather than just the level of satisfaction or existence of potential alternatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the maintenance mechanisms partners use to keep relationships?

A
  • Accommodation
  • Willingness to sacrifice
  • Forgiveness
  • Positive illusions
  • Ridiculing alternatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is accommodation in maintenance mechanisms?

A
  • Accommodation – acting in a way that promotes relationships, rather than keeping a tally of costs and rewards.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is willingness to sacrifice in maintenance mechanisms?

A

Putting partner’s interests first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is forgiveness in maintenance mechanisms?

A

willingness to forgive partner’s mistakes, both minor and serous ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is positive illusions maintenance mechanisms?

A

Being unrealistically positive about partner’s qualities

17
Q

What is Ridiculing alternatives maintenance mechanisms?

A

minimising the advantages of potential alternatives and viewing them in a negative light.

18
Q

Research supporting the investment model?

A
  • There are numerous research studies suppor4ng the Investment Model. Impett, Beals and Peplau (2002) conducted a longitudinal study using a large sample of married couples over an 18 months period. They found that stability of the relationships positively correlated with commitment shown by the partners.
  • Rhahgan and Axsom (2006) studied a group of women and found that all three factors identified by Rusbult et al. (Satisfaction , comparison with alternatives and investment) featured in participants’ decision to stay with their partner.
19
Q

More evidence supporting the investment model?

A

Lee and Agnew (2003)
• Conducted a meta-analysis where they reviewed 52 studies from 1970 to 1999
• 11,000 participants from five countries
• Found that satisfaction, comparison with alternatives and investment all predicted relationship commitment
• Relationships with high levels of commitment were most successful
• Outcomes were true for both men and women, and homosexual and heterosexual couples

20
Q

Strengths of the theory

A
  • Methodology
    Self-report measures such as questionnaires or interviews
    Important as it is the indiviudals perception of the relationship and the factors surrounding the relationship It is your belief or non-belief in the relationship that will influence your commitment
  • Explains abusive relationships
    Why are abused partners so committed to the relationship?
    Rusbult and Martz (1995)
    Studied ‘battered’ women at a shelter and found that those most likely to return to an abusive partner reported making the most investment and having the least attractive alternatives
    A victim of abuse does not have to be satisfied with a relationship to stay in it
  • Application to other populations
    Main claims of the model have been shown to be applicable to many populations in different types of relationships (US, Netherlands, Taiwan) with different participants (homosexual, heterosexual, martial and non-marital, friendships and abusive relationships)
21
Q

Problems with the Methodology

A

Measuring the variables
• Difficult to measure commitment, investment and satisfaction – faced criticism for this
• Developed the Investment Model Scale – shown to have high reliability and validity while measuring these variables
• Also applicable to a wide variation of populations
• However the scale does rely on self-report measures. What could be a problem with this?

22
Q

Weaknesses of the Study

A
  • Oversimplifies investment
    • Goodfriend and Agnew (2008) – there is more to investment than just the resources you have already put in
    • The partners early on will have made very few investments
    • Extended the Investment Model by adding in Future Investments.
    • Original model is limited – does not recognise true complexity of investment
  • Correlational Research
    • A strong correlation is not evidence of causation
    • We cannot conclude that these factors cause commitment in a relationship
    • Direction of causality may be the reverse of what the model states – the more committed you feel to a partner, the more investment you are willing to make
23
Q

What study did Rusbult do in 1983?

A
  • Participants were asked to read descriptions of hypothetical relationships that varied in all of the following ; satisfaction level, alternatives, and investment
  • As well as how satisfied and committed they thought the individuals would be to that relationship
  • Also carried out a longitudinal study where participants were asked to complete a survey about their own relationship to determine if changes in satisfaction level, quality of alternatives and investment size affected the level of commitment in their relationship
  • As a result, they would predict how long the relationship would last
24
Q

What is an investment in a relationship?

A

Investment – the resources associated with a romantic relationship which the partner would lose if the relationship were to end
• Considered to be the most important factor in maintaining commitment in a relationship