relationships between branches Flashcards

1
Q

supreme court

A

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the UK and was created to separate the UK’s judiciary from parliament so that the judiciary can more easily check the power of parliament and the executive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

role of supreme court

A

court of appeal for criminal and civil case rulings made in lower courts, uks final court of appeal, excluding scotland

not final court of appeal for criminal case in scot.

sc hears appeal on cases where there are issues of public significance, where there are arguable points of law

key functions- defendings rights and liberties of citizens
law enforcement and applying eu law
human rights act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

supreme court in defedning rights and liberties

A

defends rights and liberties of uk citizens

uses rule of law to provide wide range of protection of citizens rights

hra 1998, protects uk citizens rights- used in court, includes freedoms e,g right to life, right to fair trial
- eu laws protected by sc, outlined in echr
(judicial review, natural justice and precedent from past rulings protecting rights and freedoms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

supreme court on law enforcement

A

court upholds laws and rights when challenged, e.g. rights given by freedom of information act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

supreme court on government decisions

A

sc can rule against government laws, declare them illegal

sc can declare gov law as incopatible with echr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

supreme court composition

A

12 judges- 10 justices, 1 deputy, 1 president

2005 constitutional reform act, establish sc to replace law lords, as part of separation of parliament and judiciary
justices e,g lord reed, lord sumpton, lord lloyd jones

justices dont have term limit but must retire at 70, if appointed after 1995 (said by 1993 act of parliament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

principle of judicial independence

A

judes free from polticial pressures, independent of executive and legislature

able to make rulings without external pressures, including having the security of tenure , independent appointment and promotion process

mps and gov not allowed to comment on court cases - take place to prevent political influence over court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

principle of judicial neutrality

A

judges poltiically neutral, dont get involed with any party politics

neutrality important as they have to rule on political issues

e.g. supreme court rules highly polticial cases e,g, 2012 allowing 4 zimbabwean refugees to stay in uk- government wanted to deport them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

neautral and independent nature of court

A

neutral- doesnt engage with any political activity and publicly express their views

judges shortlined by independent slect committee- gov has limited say on who can become judge

they have security of tenure- rpevents gov from punishing judges on the rulings they make

gov cant comment on cases which are ongoing- court makes independent decision without gov intervening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

court isnt neutral?

A

judges not balanced demographically
majority white , male, middle aged

imbalance means court lacks neutrality in its rulings
more representative sc - potentially makes court more neutral, range of viewpoints in rulings made byjudges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

court isnt independent

A

lord chncellor, member of executive, makes final decisions on appointment in supreme court

lord chancellors role in appointments, giv gov influence over choosing judges- theyre most likely sharing similar positionsto gov regarding key issues

sc does not often rule against government in cases, lack of independence in practice? gov has some influence over sc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

sc having influence through judicial review

A

sc influences executive and parliament through judicial review

only has limited powers on judicial review

can overturnsecondary legislaiton, cannot overturn primary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sc having influence through ultra vires

A

principle of ultra vires- when something or someone acts beyond powers, acting without legal authority

sc can overturn legislation bcof principle of ultra vires
e.g. 2016 chris grayling, ruled as acting ultra vires, when introducing residence test to legal aid act in 2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sc having influence by opposing gov decision

A

sc can make rulings based on hra
which can oppose gov decision, e,g issues of state of security

court can make declaration of incompatability- aprliaments legislation opposing echr

sc judges uphold decisions on info being published agaist wishes of gov- in cases of freedom over information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

cases of opposig the gov

A

declaration of incompatability, june 2018, court issued declaraction of incompatabilityon the civil partnerships act, incompatible with echr as gay couples are allowed to marry and become civil partners
- freedom of information, 2015, court upheld freedom of iformation request to publish prince charles letters to govermnet ministers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

parliament holding executive to account

A

Parliament has many ways of holding the government to account, including through questions to ministers, select committees, voting and a vote of no confidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ministers questions

A

questions asked of gov ministers by mps and house of lord peers

ministers questions- 1 hour each day in parliament, ministers answer backbencher quesitons about their department
- put pressure on gov ministers to know all of their departments work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

pm quesiton time

A

takes place for 30 mins each wednesday
mps ask pm questionsabout various important issues
leader of opposition asks pm six questions before mps ask questions on any gov affairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

benefits of pmqs

A

direct answers from pm, asked by mps

important way of holding pm accoutable for gov work

pm must be briefed in detail on major issues which are interests of public, - they do not know questions that will be asked in advance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

criticisms of pmqs- punch and judy

A

pmqs more about political point scoring than effective scrutiny of pm and gov

pmq named punch and judy politics, often shouting match between polticians in front of media
e.g. john bercow, called pmqs a shouting match everyday wednesday lunchtime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

pmq criticism of questions

A

mps from gov party will ask pm planted questions to make gov and pm look strong in front of voters

pm david cameron, aides sent emailsto conservative mps for questions for them to ask at pmqse.g. benefits of their economic policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

parliamet holding exectuive to account

A

Parliament has many ways of holding the government to account, including through questions to ministers, select committees, voting and a vote of no confidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

select committess- parliament crutinising executive

A

departmental select committees scrutinise governmental departmental work, scrutinise ministers in detail, through longer style of questiig than in question time

eg nick hurd, home office minister, questined by housing, communities and local government committee on the support that was being provided for people affected by grenfell tower fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

benefits of select committees

A

closely scrutinise individual governmental departments

publish reports on issues, gov must respond in 60 days

gov published a response, to report called for apprencticehsips reforms by business,energy and industiral stratedy and education committees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
criticsim of select committees
can be ineffective at holding gov to accout, ministers unhelpful at providing evidence when questioned 2016 boris johnson, foreign secretary at the time, accused of waffling by committee chair of foreign affairs select committee during questionign
26
palrimaent holding executive to account through voting
Parliament has many ways of holding the government to account, including through questions to ministers, select committees, voting and a vote of no confidence.
27
voting and backbench rebellions
backbenchers in hoc and hol can control executive by voting against government backed bills hoc, backbench rebellions can take place, mps of the party in government can vote against their own partys legislation to prevent executive from introducing laws
28
voting is effective,
hoc blocked gov legislation through successful backbench rebellion mps voted against parliament 309-305 votes, 12 conservative mps voting against partys gov - in favour of parliament getting vote on a final brexit deal hol causes gov to change its policies, voting against passing of legislation - gov defeated 38 times in hol from 2016-2017
29
voting is ineffective
if executive has a large majority, voting against it is less effective -backbench rebellions difficult if 3 line whips are put in place, if mpp defies a whip theyre expelled from a party,- but keep seat and sits as independent mp hol can only delay legislation passing, propose amendments, rather than stopping it pass into law- gov can veto any delays by hol
30
votes of no confidence
can be put down by opposition in hoc where mps vote if they have confidence in gov pm can put down a vote of confidence in gov in attempt to restore authority in parliament if own mps vote against gov on a key issue if gov loses a confidence, by convention, gov resigns
31
votes of no confidence effective
successful in removing govs in power pm james callaghan lost vote of no confidence in 1979- caused him to step down as pmm , called gen election- which he lost can be successful in restoring gov authority, major called vote of confidence in 1993- bc mps were opposed to his gov support after maastricht treaty
32
executive dominance over parliament
The executive exerts dominance over parliament by choosing the direction of its programme of legislation and using its majority to often pass its bills through parliament
33
executive dominance over parliament - elective dictatorship
when executive dominates legislature mainly used executive has large majority in parliament - used by lord hailsham - lord chancellor in 1976
34
executive dominance over parliament- control over legislation
gov uses party whips to pass its bills through hoc by instructing party backbenchers to vote i favour of their legislation gov controls parliaments timetable- so they can decide what legislation parliament votes and debates on
35
executive dominance on parliament- parliamentary sovereignty
parliament does have legislative sovereignty- has ultimate power to pass legislation into law if gov has majority in hoc, it often does, gov can pass most of its billls into law hoc has more power than lord to pass legislation, hol unable to completely block legislation
36
executive dominance on parliament- not effective dominance
if theres a small majority or minority gov, executive bills be stopped from passing through parliament
37
balance of powers
The balance of power has shifted from the executive to parliament, through select committees and parliament votes against the government, however, the executive can still pass most legislation through parliament.
38
select committees for balance of power
e.g. reforms by wright committee in 2009, gave select committees more power reforms include reducing number of committees, giving mps voting power to choose select committee chairs backbench business committee- formed by select committee reforms, committee schedules debates in hoc on topics suggested by mps rather than gov
39
balance of power- military action
gov has increasingly consulted parliamet over military action, choosing to put proposed military action to hoc for a debate and vote gov sought parliamentary approval for military action against syrian regime in 2013 which parliament voted against - parliament voted in favour for military action in iraq in 2014, syria in 2015 - but in 2018 pm theresa may, chose to send airstrikes to syria without consulting parliament first
40
balance of powers- house of lord voting
hol, where gov does not have majority- have often delayed gov bills from passing 2017- gov defeated in hol over its bill to enable people in apprenticeships and under age of 20 to qualify for child benefit
41
balance of powers-gov dominance
gov rarely defeated in parliament votes, often passes its legislation into law- bc of parliament whips , majority in parliament gov has a payroll of mps , who have role in executive, from senior to junior roles- always voting in support of gov policy in parliament tony blairs majority gov - only defeated 4 times during its 10 years in power
42
eu
The European Union (EU) is an economic and political union of 28 countries in Europe which is based on the free movement of people, goods, capital and services between member states.
43
four freedoms of eu
aims to intergrate member states with four freedoms free movmement of goods free movement of capital free movement of workers freedom to provide and establish service freedoms outlined in 1957 treaty of rome, establish in european economic community
44
eu on social policy
developments in eu social policy through charter of fundamental rights and the social chapter social chapter introduced by 1992 maastricht treaty, to protect workers rights, regulate social policy charter of fudamental rights, introduced by 2009 lisbon treaty, outlines political social and economic rights, - must be respected when eu institutions exercise their powers
45
eu - social chapter
outlines 30 principles e.g. rules on working conditions, working hours, employee payment blair signed uk up to social chapter in 1997 following this, eu has undertaken many social policy initiatives e.g. putting out directives to prevent employers discriminating against workers on race, gender, age, religion, disability or sexual orientation
46
eu charter of fundamental rights
member states must account for this when incorportating eu law into national law, in matters concerning eu law rights in this e.g. pright to lie, private and family life , right to vote, a fair trial, freedom of religion, expression and assembly among others
47
eu - politicial and economic union
eu moved towards political and ecnomic union, by introducing euro , reduced veto powers of national governments 2017, eu outlined proposals to prevent eu states from having veto powers to blcok passing of some legislation e.g. areas like taxation, to bring about a closer and political and economic union euro introduced as common currency in eu member states, since its creation - 19 eu members, 6 non eu members states have adopted it
48
eu in policy making
The EU is involved in policy-making through treaties, rulings of the European Court of Justice, directives and regulations. The European Commission ensures that all EU members apply EU law and policy.
49
eu policy- treaties and regulations
treates- binding agreemets made by eu member states, set out eus institution rules, relationship of member states with union, objectives of eu example- of an eu treaty - 1997 treaty of amnsterdam , regulations are legal binding acts, regulations apply immediately to all eu member states general data protection regulation- eu law, increase data protection for all in eu, applied to all member states from may 2018
50
eu policy- directives and rulings
directives - legislation setting out goals which all eu member states must achieve give member states power to make own laws so they can decide on how to reach eu goals 2013 industrial emissions directive, set out goals for eu memeber states to lower industrial emission european court of jusitce, enforces eu law, hears caes from european commission, against national gov that has failed to comply with eu law
51
common fisheries policy
outlines rules for managing stocks of fish and fishing fleets in europe - aims to rpeserve fish stocks by setting quotas on amount of certain types of fish that each member state is allowed to catch common fisheries policy, providing funding to fishermen, gives eu fleets same levelof access to all waters in eu
52
impact of common fisheries policyin uk
viwed as unfair on fishermen in certain areas, who have their quotas bought up by fihsermen of other countries vieweing equal access for all eu fishermen as unfair - uk has largest fishing zone compared to other countries, fishermen in other eu states benefit more than those in uk as part of brexit, uk gov wants uk to leave common fisheries policy
53
social chapter - eu law
outlined 30 principles to promote workers rights, adopted by eu members after single makret introduced in 1992 uk initially opted out of the social chapter - signed up to it in 1997
54
impact of social chapter on uk
eroding uk sovereignty, introducising laws and regulation uk businesses must follow working time directive outlines rules set by eu around weekly working hours, and a minimum number of holiday days for employees in uk businesses many uk businesses oppposed to social chapter, it has increased their labour costs , made them less competitve than businesses in other countries- with less tight regulations
54
sovereignty in uk aprliament system
Under parliamentary sovereignty, parliament is the most important legal authority in the UK with the power to create or end laws
55
legla and political sovereignty in uk parliament
legal sovereignty- legal right by which sovereignty is exercised political sovereignty- exercising sovereingty in practice
56
movement of sovereignty
sovereignty shifted from parliament to executive, pm used prerogattive powerrs to deploy army without consent of parliament 2018 pm may, semt british fighter jetsto carry out in syria -in reponse to regime use of chemical weapons without parliament approval under royal prerogative 1998 hra, introduced rulings from echr into uk law- takes awaylegal supremacy of parliament - placed it in judiciairy
57
sovereignty to eu and judiciary
membership ineu - moved sovereignty away from aprliament and to eu uk subject to eu regulations and directives as part of its membership 1990 facotrtame case, eu courts ruled over parliamentary rule, ships had a mojirty of british owners if to fish in uk waters 1998 hra, introduced rulings from echr into uk law, taking away legal supremacy of uk aprliament- placed it in judiciary
58
constitutional reform- sovereignty
constitutional reform moved sovereginty away from parliament and other uk institutions devolution of power 1998, from uk to scottish parliament, wales andnorthern ireland assemblies, took some powers around education, health, environment away from uk parliament 2005 constitutional reform act, established sc- transferred hol power as uks final appeal court to separate supreme court
59
legal sovereignty in parliament
parliament can legally revoke any legislation, affecting its sovereignty can revoke act of parliament permitting eu entry, withdrawing eu membership 2017 - parliament voting in favour of brexit bill, triggered article 50, started process of uk leaving eu parliament still has legal sovereignty over ukmost important powers of foreign policy, taxation and defence
60
limits to political sovereignty
referendums place sovereignthy in hands of uk voters, enabled citizens to make key political decisions on changes to uk law 2016 referendum on leving eu, over 33.5 million voted eu can make laws that overrule parliamentary law, undermining uk parliamentary sovereignty (including directives and regulations) executive restricting parliamentary sovereignty, through gov sending troops to war without seeking a vote from parliament